{"title":"头颈癌精确放疗热塑掩膜质量量化:三维压力测试和六维轴误差分析。","authors":"Weirchiang You, Chienchih Chen, Hsiushan Chu, Yuchen Yau, Tingyang Liu, Peishuan Lai, Yungcheng Chen, Niwei Chen, Chefu Tsai, Heyuan Hsieh","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with head and neck cancers often require radiotherapy, where immobilization devices like thermoplastic masks ensure precise radiation delivery by minimizing movement. However, the quality of these masks lacks standard reference data. This study aimed to establish institutional acceptance criteria for thermoplastic mask quality and quantify their effectiveness using a 3 dimensional stress test and verified the setup errors using daily megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT). Between April and June 2022, 30 patients underwent radiotherapy with thermoplastic masks. Four key facial points (forehead, bilateral cheekbones, and chin) were tested for supporting force. Mean forces ranged from 3.97 N to 8.8 N. MVCT was used to assess 6 dimensional-axis errors, with mean translational errors (x, y, z) of 0.32 mm, -1.09 mm, and 2.24 mm, respectively, and rotational errors (yaw, pitch, roll) of -0.12°, 0.22°, and 0.35°, respectively. The results demonstrated that the thermoplastic masks provided precise immobilization, minimizing setup errors in 6 dimensions. Our findings offer a quantifiable method to ensure high-quality immobilization during radiotherapy for patients with head and neck cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying thermoplastic mask quality for precision radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: A 3D stress test and 6D-axis error analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Weirchiang You, Chienchih Chen, Hsiushan Chu, Yuchen Yau, Tingyang Liu, Peishuan Lai, Yungcheng Chen, Niwei Chen, Chefu Tsai, Heyuan Hsieh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MD.0000000000040365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients with head and neck cancers often require radiotherapy, where immobilization devices like thermoplastic masks ensure precise radiation delivery by minimizing movement. However, the quality of these masks lacks standard reference data. This study aimed to establish institutional acceptance criteria for thermoplastic mask quality and quantify their effectiveness using a 3 dimensional stress test and verified the setup errors using daily megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT). Between April and June 2022, 30 patients underwent radiotherapy with thermoplastic masks. Four key facial points (forehead, bilateral cheekbones, and chin) were tested for supporting force. Mean forces ranged from 3.97 N to 8.8 N. MVCT was used to assess 6 dimensional-axis errors, with mean translational errors (x, y, z) of 0.32 mm, -1.09 mm, and 2.24 mm, respectively, and rotational errors (yaw, pitch, roll) of -0.12°, 0.22°, and 0.35°, respectively. The results demonstrated that the thermoplastic masks provided precise immobilization, minimizing setup errors in 6 dimensions. Our findings offer a quantifiable method to ensure high-quality immobilization during radiotherapy for patients with head and neck cancers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537626/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040365\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040365","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying thermoplastic mask quality for precision radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: A 3D stress test and 6D-axis error analysis.
Patients with head and neck cancers often require radiotherapy, where immobilization devices like thermoplastic masks ensure precise radiation delivery by minimizing movement. However, the quality of these masks lacks standard reference data. This study aimed to establish institutional acceptance criteria for thermoplastic mask quality and quantify their effectiveness using a 3 dimensional stress test and verified the setup errors using daily megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT). Between April and June 2022, 30 patients underwent radiotherapy with thermoplastic masks. Four key facial points (forehead, bilateral cheekbones, and chin) were tested for supporting force. Mean forces ranged from 3.97 N to 8.8 N. MVCT was used to assess 6 dimensional-axis errors, with mean translational errors (x, y, z) of 0.32 mm, -1.09 mm, and 2.24 mm, respectively, and rotational errors (yaw, pitch, roll) of -0.12°, 0.22°, and 0.35°, respectively. The results demonstrated that the thermoplastic masks provided precise immobilization, minimizing setup errors in 6 dimensions. Our findings offer a quantifiable method to ensure high-quality immobilization during radiotherapy for patients with head and neck cancers.
期刊介绍:
Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties.
As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.