用户对在线性健康症状检查工具的看法:定性研究。

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alicia Jean King, Jade Elissa Bilardi, Janet Mary Towns, Kate Maddaford, Christopher Kincaid Fairley, Eric P F Chow, Tiffany Renee Phillips
{"title":"用户对在线性健康症状检查工具的看法:定性研究。","authors":"Alicia Jean King, Jade Elissa Bilardi, Janet Mary Towns, Kate Maddaford, Christopher Kincaid Fairley, Eric P F Chow, Tiffany Renee Phillips","doi":"10.2196/54565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delayed diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) contributes to poorer health outcomes and onward transmission to sexual partners. Access to best-practice sexual health care may be limited by barriers such as cost, distance to care providers, sexual stigma, and trust in health care providers. Online assessments of risk offer a novel means of supporting access to evidence-based sexual health information, testing, and treatment by providing more individualized sexual health information based on user inputs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This developmental evaluation aims to find potential users' views and experiences in relation to an online assessment of risk, called iSpySTI (Melbourne Sexual Health Center), including the likely impacts of use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals presenting with urogenital symptoms to a specialist sexual health clinic were given the opportunity to trial a web-based, Bayesian-powered tool that provides a list of 2 to 4 potential causes of their symptoms based on inputs of known STI risk factors and symptoms. Those who tried the tool were invited to participate in a once-off, semistructured research interview. Descriptive, action, and emotion coding informed the comparative analysis of individual cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings from interviews with 14 people who had used the iSpySTI tool support the superiority of the online assessment of STI risk compared to existing sources of sexual health information (eg, internet search engines) in providing trusted and probabilistic information to users. Additionally, potential users reported benefits to their emotional well-being in the intervening period between noticing symptoms and being able to access care. Differences in current and imagined urgency of health care seeking and emotional impacts were found based on clinical diagnosis (eg, non-STI, curable and incurable but treatable STIs) and whether participants were born in Australia or elsewhere.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online assessments of risk provide users experiencing urogenital symptoms with more individualized and evidence-based health information that can improve their health care-seeking and provide reassurance in the period before they can access care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User Views on Online Sexual Health Symptom Checker Tool: Qualitative Research.\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Jean King, Jade Elissa Bilardi, Janet Mary Towns, Kate Maddaford, Christopher Kincaid Fairley, Eric P F Chow, Tiffany Renee Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/54565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delayed diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) contributes to poorer health outcomes and onward transmission to sexual partners. Access to best-practice sexual health care may be limited by barriers such as cost, distance to care providers, sexual stigma, and trust in health care providers. Online assessments of risk offer a novel means of supporting access to evidence-based sexual health information, testing, and treatment by providing more individualized sexual health information based on user inputs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This developmental evaluation aims to find potential users' views and experiences in relation to an online assessment of risk, called iSpySTI (Melbourne Sexual Health Center), including the likely impacts of use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals presenting with urogenital symptoms to a specialist sexual health clinic were given the opportunity to trial a web-based, Bayesian-powered tool that provides a list of 2 to 4 potential causes of their symptoms based on inputs of known STI risk factors and symptoms. Those who tried the tool were invited to participate in a once-off, semistructured research interview. Descriptive, action, and emotion coding informed the comparative analysis of individual cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings from interviews with 14 people who had used the iSpySTI tool support the superiority of the online assessment of STI risk compared to existing sources of sexual health information (eg, internet search engines) in providing trusted and probabilistic information to users. Additionally, potential users reported benefits to their emotional well-being in the intervening period between noticing symptoms and being able to access care. Differences in current and imagined urgency of health care seeking and emotional impacts were found based on clinical diagnosis (eg, non-STI, curable and incurable but treatable STIs) and whether participants were born in Australia or elsewhere.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online assessments of risk provide users experiencing urogenital symptoms with more individualized and evidence-based health information that can improve their health care-seeking and provide reassurance in the period before they can access care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/54565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/54565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:延迟诊断和治疗性传播感染(STI)会导致较差的健康结果,并将疾病传染给性伴侣。获得最佳性健康保健可能会受到各种障碍的限制,如费用、与保健提供者的距离、性污名以及对保健提供者的信任。在线风险评估根据用户输入的信息提供更加个性化的性健康信息,为获取循证性健康信息、检测和治疗提供了一种新的支持手段:这项发展性评估旨在了解潜在用户对名为 iSpySTI(墨尔本性健康中心)的在线风险评估的看法和体验,包括使用可能产生的影响:方法:在性健康专科门诊出现泌尿生殖系统症状的人有机会试用一种基于贝叶斯的网络工具,该工具可根据输入的已知性传播感染风险因素和症状,提供 2 到 4 个可能导致其症状的原因列表。试用过该工具的人被邀请参加一次性半结构化研究访谈。通过描述性编码、行动编码和情感编码对个别案例进行比较分析:对 14 名使用过 iSpySTI 工具的人进行的访谈结果表明,与现有的性健康信息来源(如互联网搜索引擎)相比,在线性传播感染风险评估在向用户提供可信的概率信息方面更具优势。此外,潜在用户表示,从发现症状到能够获得治疗之间的这段时间里,他们的情绪健康得到了改善。根据临床诊断(如非性传播感染、可治愈和不可治愈但可治疗的性传播感染)以及参与者是在澳大利亚出生还是在其他地方出生,发现了当前和想象中寻求医疗保健的紧迫性和情绪影响的差异:结论:在线风险评估为出现泌尿生殖系统症状的用户提供了更多个性化的循证健康信息,可以改善他们的就医情况,并在他们就医前的这段时间里为他们提供保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
User Views on Online Sexual Health Symptom Checker Tool: Qualitative Research.

Background: Delayed diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) contributes to poorer health outcomes and onward transmission to sexual partners. Access to best-practice sexual health care may be limited by barriers such as cost, distance to care providers, sexual stigma, and trust in health care providers. Online assessments of risk offer a novel means of supporting access to evidence-based sexual health information, testing, and treatment by providing more individualized sexual health information based on user inputs.

Objective: This developmental evaluation aims to find potential users' views and experiences in relation to an online assessment of risk, called iSpySTI (Melbourne Sexual Health Center), including the likely impacts of use.

Methods: Individuals presenting with urogenital symptoms to a specialist sexual health clinic were given the opportunity to trial a web-based, Bayesian-powered tool that provides a list of 2 to 4 potential causes of their symptoms based on inputs of known STI risk factors and symptoms. Those who tried the tool were invited to participate in a once-off, semistructured research interview. Descriptive, action, and emotion coding informed the comparative analysis of individual cases.

Results: Findings from interviews with 14 people who had used the iSpySTI tool support the superiority of the online assessment of STI risk compared to existing sources of sexual health information (eg, internet search engines) in providing trusted and probabilistic information to users. Additionally, potential users reported benefits to their emotional well-being in the intervening period between noticing symptoms and being able to access care. Differences in current and imagined urgency of health care seeking and emotional impacts were found based on clinical diagnosis (eg, non-STI, curable and incurable but treatable STIs) and whether participants were born in Australia or elsewhere.

Conclusions: Online assessments of risk provide users experiencing urogenital symptoms with more individualized and evidence-based health information that can improve their health care-seeking and provide reassurance in the period before they can access care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信