瑞典牙槽骨移植术后牙槽骨裂隙儿科患者的低剂量锥形束计算机断层扫描--临床研究

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
António Vicente, Josefine Cederhag, Nilofar Rashidi, Anna-Paulina Wiedel, Magnus Becker, Susanne Brogårdh-Roth, Xie-Qi Shi, Kristina Hellén-Halme
{"title":"瑞典牙槽骨移植术后牙槽骨裂隙儿科患者的低剂量锥形束计算机断层扫描--临床研究","authors":"António Vicente,&nbsp;Josefine Cederhag,&nbsp;Nilofar Rashidi,&nbsp;Anna-Paulina Wiedel,&nbsp;Magnus Becker,&nbsp;Susanne Brogårdh-Roth,&nbsp;Xie-Qi Shi,&nbsp;Kristina Hellén-Halme","doi":"10.1002/cre2.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to investigate whether a low-dose cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) protocol provides diagnostically acceptable image quality for assessing bone healing after alveolar bone grafting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study cohort comprised 11 patients (aged 7–14 years) with orofacial clefts who had undergone alveolar bone grafting at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Sweden. During the postsurgical follow-up at 6 months, each patient was assessed twice: once with a standard-dose CBCT protocol and once with a low-dose CBCT protocol, which in total corresponds to one CBCT examination made with the exposure settings recommended by the manufacturer. Among others, the assessed parameters included subjective image quality, as well as bone graft height, thickness, and integration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No significant differences were found between the standard- and low-dose protocols for most parameters (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Exceptions included subjective image quality (one observer, <i>p</i> = 0.05) and confidence levels during the assessment (three observers, <i>p</i> = 0.01, 0.01, 0.02).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The low-dose protocol yielded adequate image quality for postoperative CBCT healing assessment in patients who have undergone alveolar bone grafting. However, the confidence level of observers during the assessment with the low-dose protocol was reduced. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06395077).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06395077).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10203,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","volume":"10 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-Dose Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Swedish Pediatric Patients With Alveolar Clefts Following Alveolar Bone Grafting—A Clinical Study\",\"authors\":\"António Vicente,&nbsp;Josefine Cederhag,&nbsp;Nilofar Rashidi,&nbsp;Anna-Paulina Wiedel,&nbsp;Magnus Becker,&nbsp;Susanne Brogårdh-Roth,&nbsp;Xie-Qi Shi,&nbsp;Kristina Hellén-Halme\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cre2.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to investigate whether a low-dose cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) protocol provides diagnostically acceptable image quality for assessing bone healing after alveolar bone grafting.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study cohort comprised 11 patients (aged 7–14 years) with orofacial clefts who had undergone alveolar bone grafting at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Sweden. During the postsurgical follow-up at 6 months, each patient was assessed twice: once with a standard-dose CBCT protocol and once with a low-dose CBCT protocol, which in total corresponds to one CBCT examination made with the exposure settings recommended by the manufacturer. Among others, the assessed parameters included subjective image quality, as well as bone graft height, thickness, and integration.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>No significant differences were found between the standard- and low-dose protocols for most parameters (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Exceptions included subjective image quality (one observer, <i>p</i> = 0.05) and confidence levels during the assessment (three observers, <i>p</i> = 0.01, 0.01, 0.02).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The low-dose protocol yielded adequate image quality for postoperative CBCT healing assessment in patients who have undergone alveolar bone grafting. However, the confidence level of observers during the assessment with the low-dose protocol was reduced. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06395077).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Clinical Trial Registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06395077).</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"10 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70021\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在探讨低剂量锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)方案能否为评估牙槽骨移植术后的骨愈合提供诊断上可接受的图像质量:研究对象包括在瑞典马尔默斯科纳大学医院接受牙槽骨移植手术的11名口面部裂患者(7-14岁)。在手术后 6 个月的随访期间,每位患者都接受了两次评估:一次是标准剂量 CBCT 方案,另一次是低剂量 CBCT 方案。评估参数包括主观图像质量以及植骨高度、厚度和整合度:结果:标准剂量和低剂量方案在大多数参数上无明显差异(P>0.05)。例外情况包括主观图像质量(一名观察者,p = 0.05)和评估过程中的信心水平(三名观察者,p = 0.01、0.01、0.02):低剂量方案为接受牙槽骨移植术的患者术后 CBCT 愈合评估提供了足够的图像质量。结论:低剂量方案可为接受牙槽骨移植术的患者术后 CBCT 愈合评估提供足够的图像质量,但在使用低剂量方案进行评估时,观察者的信心水平有所下降。本研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06395077).Clinical trial registration 上注册:本研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06395077) 上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Low-Dose Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Swedish Pediatric Patients With Alveolar Clefts Following Alveolar Bone Grafting—A Clinical Study

Low-Dose Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Swedish Pediatric Patients With Alveolar Clefts Following Alveolar Bone Grafting—A Clinical Study

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate whether a low-dose cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) protocol provides diagnostically acceptable image quality for assessing bone healing after alveolar bone grafting.

Material and Methods

The study cohort comprised 11 patients (aged 7–14 years) with orofacial clefts who had undergone alveolar bone grafting at Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Sweden. During the postsurgical follow-up at 6 months, each patient was assessed twice: once with a standard-dose CBCT protocol and once with a low-dose CBCT protocol, which in total corresponds to one CBCT examination made with the exposure settings recommended by the manufacturer. Among others, the assessed parameters included subjective image quality, as well as bone graft height, thickness, and integration.

Results

No significant differences were found between the standard- and low-dose protocols for most parameters (p > 0.05). Exceptions included subjective image quality (one observer, p = 0.05) and confidence levels during the assessment (three observers, p = 0.01, 0.01, 0.02).

Conclusions

The low-dose protocol yielded adequate image quality for postoperative CBCT healing assessment in patients who have undergone alveolar bone grafting. However, the confidence level of observers during the assessment with the low-dose protocol was reduced. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06395077).

Clinical Trial Registration

This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06395077).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dental Research aims to provide open access peer-reviewed publications of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work within all disciplines and fields of oral medicine and dentistry. The scope of Clinical and Experimental Dental Research comprises original research material on the anatomy, physiology and pathology of oro-facial, oro-pharyngeal and maxillofacial tissues, and functions and dysfunctions within the stomatognathic system, and the epidemiology, aetiology, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of diseases and conditions that have an effect on the homeostasis of the mouth, jaws, and closely associated structures, as well as the healing and regeneration and the clinical aspects of replacement of hard and soft tissues with biomaterials, and the rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions. Studies that bring new knowledge on how to advance health on the individual or public health levels, including interactions between oral and general health and ill-health are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信