{"title":"制备设计对树脂粘结附着体固位强度的影响。","authors":"Jorge Wasmund, Sebastian Wille, Matthias Kern","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-06017-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study investigated the influence of retention grooves and material thickness of the retainer wing on the retentive strength of resin-bonded attachments (RBAs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-four extracted human molars were used. Each tooth received a preparation limited to the enamel for the retainer wings of the RBAs. The specimens were divided into eight groups, each containing eight specimens. The groups varied based on the number of conical retention grooves (0, 1, 2, or 4) and the thickness of the CoCr retainer wings (0.4 mm and 0.8 mm). Before testing the retentive strength of the RBAs, the specimens underwent 37,500 thermal cycles followed by dynamic loading of 1,200,000 cycles on the RBAs' patrices using a chewing simulator. The debonding test was conducted using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean retentive strength ranged from 326 ± 96 N to 440 ± 77 N. Only a small portion of specimens (10.9%) exhibited adhesive failure, while the remainder demonstrated cohesive failure within the tooth structure. Neither the number of retention grooves, the thickness of the retainer wings, nor the size of the bonding surface significantly affected retentive strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that reducing the number of retention grooves and the material thickness does not influence the retentive strength of RBAs.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The retention of RBAs appears promising, supporting the clinical application of this treatment modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"28 11","pages":"628"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of the preparation design on the retentive strength of resin-bonded attachments.\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Wasmund, Sebastian Wille, Matthias Kern\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-024-06017-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study investigated the influence of retention grooves and material thickness of the retainer wing on the retentive strength of resin-bonded attachments (RBAs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-four extracted human molars were used. Each tooth received a preparation limited to the enamel for the retainer wings of the RBAs. The specimens were divided into eight groups, each containing eight specimens. The groups varied based on the number of conical retention grooves (0, 1, 2, or 4) and the thickness of the CoCr retainer wings (0.4 mm and 0.8 mm). Before testing the retentive strength of the RBAs, the specimens underwent 37,500 thermal cycles followed by dynamic loading of 1,200,000 cycles on the RBAs' patrices using a chewing simulator. The debonding test was conducted using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean retentive strength ranged from 326 ± 96 N to 440 ± 77 N. Only a small portion of specimens (10.9%) exhibited adhesive failure, while the remainder demonstrated cohesive failure within the tooth structure. Neither the number of retention grooves, the thickness of the retainer wings, nor the size of the bonding surface significantly affected retentive strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that reducing the number of retention grooves and the material thickness does not influence the retentive strength of RBAs.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The retention of RBAs appears promising, supporting the clinical application of this treatment modality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"28 11\",\"pages\":\"628\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534820/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06017-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06017-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of the preparation design on the retentive strength of resin-bonded attachments.
Objectives: The study investigated the influence of retention grooves and material thickness of the retainer wing on the retentive strength of resin-bonded attachments (RBAs).
Materials and methods: Sixty-four extracted human molars were used. Each tooth received a preparation limited to the enamel for the retainer wings of the RBAs. The specimens were divided into eight groups, each containing eight specimens. The groups varied based on the number of conical retention grooves (0, 1, 2, or 4) and the thickness of the CoCr retainer wings (0.4 mm and 0.8 mm). Before testing the retentive strength of the RBAs, the specimens underwent 37,500 thermal cycles followed by dynamic loading of 1,200,000 cycles on the RBAs' patrices using a chewing simulator. The debonding test was conducted using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min.
Results: The mean retentive strength ranged from 326 ± 96 N to 440 ± 77 N. Only a small portion of specimens (10.9%) exhibited adhesive failure, while the remainder demonstrated cohesive failure within the tooth structure. Neither the number of retention grooves, the thickness of the retainer wings, nor the size of the bonding surface significantly affected retentive strength.
Conclusions: The findings suggest that reducing the number of retention grooves and the material thickness does not influence the retentive strength of RBAs.
Clinical relevance: The retention of RBAs appears promising, supporting the clinical application of this treatment modality.
期刊介绍:
The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.