An Wang, Tao Li, Yun-Ye Mao, Ming Gao, Sheng Shu, Chang-Hong Xia, Yi Dong, Min Liu, Jin-Liang Wang, Jun-Xun Ma, Yi Hu
{"title":"中国RET重排实体瘤治疗策略的演变及非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的实际治疗情况。","authors":"An Wang, Tao Li, Yun-Ye Mao, Ming Gao, Sheng Shu, Chang-Hong Xia, Yi Dong, Min Liu, Jin-Liang Wang, Jun-Xun Ma, Yi Hu","doi":"10.1186/s12890-024-03371-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study endeavors to furnish an exhaustive review of the research advancements on solid tumors harboring RET rearrangement within the Chinese context, particularly emphasizing the examination of real-world therapeutic strategies and clinical outcomes observed in individuals diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The review delves into a critical assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of targeted RET inhibitors, while also scrutinizing the diverse array of treatment modalities employed in the Chinese patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study conducted a comprehensive review of the advancements made by Chinese scholars in the realm of RET driver genes. It delved into the analysis of the incidence of RET rearrangements in solid tumors, alongside an examination of the varied treatment paradigms and their current status within China. Utilizing the RECIST 1.1 criteria, the study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy achieved in RET-positive NSCLC patients undergoing diverse treatment modalities. Furthermore, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were meticulously graded following the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A retrospective, multi-center, real-world analysis was conducted, encompassing 64 patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed RET rearrangement advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between December 2015 and November 2023. Notably, KIF5B-RET emerged as the most prevalent RET fusion partner, accounting for 59.4% of cases. Therapeutic interventions among these patients included specific targeted inhibitors such as Pralsetinib (48.4%), chemotherapy (34.3%), multi-target inhibitors (15.6%), and one case (1.6%) involving immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), Pralsetinib monotherapy demonstrated a median PFS of 16.03 months, outperforming chemotherapy (2.87 months; p < 0.0001), chemotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy (6.90 months; p = 0.048), and multi-target inhibitors (2.50 months; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the one-year and two-year overall survival (OS) rates for Pralsetinib monotherapy were 64.3% and 46.4%, respectively. Regarding safety, 71.0% of patients receiving Pralsetinib experienced at least one adverse event, with 45.2% classified as grade 3-4 in severity. Notably, no fatalities were attributed to adverse events. Common adverse events included hemoglobin reduction (35.5%) and neutropenia (32.3%), indicative of an overall favorable safety profile for Pralsetinib in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study encapsulates the research endeavors and treatment advancements of RET rearrangement solid tumors within the Chinese healthcare landscape, specifically highlighting the diverse real-world therapeutic approaches and their effectiveness in managing advanced RET rearrangement NSCLC among Chinese patients. Notably, targeted RET inhibitors like Pralsetinib have emerged as potent therapeutic agents, exhibiting remarkable efficacy and a manageable safety profile in this patient cohort. These findings underscore the potential of Pralsetinib and similar targeted therapies as novel treatment options for individuals with RET fusion-positive NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of treatment strategies for solid tumors with RET rearrangement in China and real-world treatment status of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).\",\"authors\":\"An Wang, Tao Li, Yun-Ye Mao, Ming Gao, Sheng Shu, Chang-Hong Xia, Yi Dong, Min Liu, Jin-Liang Wang, Jun-Xun Ma, Yi Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12890-024-03371-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study endeavors to furnish an exhaustive review of the research advancements on solid tumors harboring RET rearrangement within the Chinese context, particularly emphasizing the examination of real-world therapeutic strategies and clinical outcomes observed in individuals diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The review delves into a critical assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of targeted RET inhibitors, while also scrutinizing the diverse array of treatment modalities employed in the Chinese patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study conducted a comprehensive review of the advancements made by Chinese scholars in the realm of RET driver genes. It delved into the analysis of the incidence of RET rearrangements in solid tumors, alongside an examination of the varied treatment paradigms and their current status within China. Utilizing the RECIST 1.1 criteria, the study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy achieved in RET-positive NSCLC patients undergoing diverse treatment modalities. Furthermore, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were meticulously graded following the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A retrospective, multi-center, real-world analysis was conducted, encompassing 64 patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed RET rearrangement advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between December 2015 and November 2023. Notably, KIF5B-RET emerged as the most prevalent RET fusion partner, accounting for 59.4% of cases. Therapeutic interventions among these patients included specific targeted inhibitors such as Pralsetinib (48.4%), chemotherapy (34.3%), multi-target inhibitors (15.6%), and one case (1.6%) involving immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), Pralsetinib monotherapy demonstrated a median PFS of 16.03 months, outperforming chemotherapy (2.87 months; p < 0.0001), chemotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy (6.90 months; p = 0.048), and multi-target inhibitors (2.50 months; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the one-year and two-year overall survival (OS) rates for Pralsetinib monotherapy were 64.3% and 46.4%, respectively. Regarding safety, 71.0% of patients receiving Pralsetinib experienced at least one adverse event, with 45.2% classified as grade 3-4 in severity. Notably, no fatalities were attributed to adverse events. Common adverse events included hemoglobin reduction (35.5%) and neutropenia (32.3%), indicative of an overall favorable safety profile for Pralsetinib in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study encapsulates the research endeavors and treatment advancements of RET rearrangement solid tumors within the Chinese healthcare landscape, specifically highlighting the diverse real-world therapeutic approaches and their effectiveness in managing advanced RET rearrangement NSCLC among Chinese patients. Notably, targeted RET inhibitors like Pralsetinib have emerged as potent therapeutic agents, exhibiting remarkable efficacy and a manageable safety profile in this patient cohort. These findings underscore the potential of Pralsetinib and similar targeted therapies as novel treatment options for individuals with RET fusion-positive NSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"552\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533424/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03371-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03371-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究力图详尽综述在中国背景下对携带RET重排的实体瘤的研究进展,特别强调对确诊为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的实际治疗策略和临床疗效的观察。该综述对 RET 靶向抑制剂的疗效进行了严格评估,同时还仔细研究了在中国患者群体中采用的各种治疗方法:该研究全面回顾了中国学者在 RET 驱动基因领域取得的进展。研究深入分析了RET重排在实体瘤中的发生率,同时考察了各种治疗模式及其在中国的现状。该研究采用RECIST 1.1标准,评估了RET阳性NSCLC患者接受不同治疗模式所取得的疗效。此外,研究还根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)对治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)进行了细致的分级:对2015年12月至2023年11月期间诊断为病理确诊RET重排晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的64名患者进行了回顾性、多中心、真实世界分析。值得注意的是,KIF5B-RET成为最普遍的RET融合伙伴,占病例的59.4%。这些患者的治疗干预措施包括普拉塞替尼等特异性靶向抑制剂(48.4%)、化疗(34.3%)、多靶点抑制剂(15.6%),还有一例(1.6%)涉及免疫疗法联合抗血管生成疗法。在无进展生存期(PFS)方面,普拉塞替尼单药治疗的中位PFS为16.03个月,优于化疗(2.87个月;P 结论:普拉塞替尼单药治疗的中位PFS为16.03个月,优于化疗(2.87个月):本研究概括了中国医疗界对RET重排实体瘤的研究和治疗进展,特别强调了现实世界中治疗晚期RET重排NSCLC的各种方法及其在中国患者中的疗效。值得注意的是,像普拉塞替尼这样的RET靶向抑制剂已成为有效的治疗药物,在这一患者群体中表现出显著的疗效和可控的安全性。这些发现凸显了普拉塞替尼和类似靶向疗法作为RET融合阳性NSCLC患者新型治疗选择的潜力。
Evolution of treatment strategies for solid tumors with RET rearrangement in China and real-world treatment status of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).
Objective: The present study endeavors to furnish an exhaustive review of the research advancements on solid tumors harboring RET rearrangement within the Chinese context, particularly emphasizing the examination of real-world therapeutic strategies and clinical outcomes observed in individuals diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The review delves into a critical assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of targeted RET inhibitors, while also scrutinizing the diverse array of treatment modalities employed in the Chinese patient population.
Methods: The study conducted a comprehensive review of the advancements made by Chinese scholars in the realm of RET driver genes. It delved into the analysis of the incidence of RET rearrangements in solid tumors, alongside an examination of the varied treatment paradigms and their current status within China. Utilizing the RECIST 1.1 criteria, the study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy achieved in RET-positive NSCLC patients undergoing diverse treatment modalities. Furthermore, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were meticulously graded following the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Results: A retrospective, multi-center, real-world analysis was conducted, encompassing 64 patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed RET rearrangement advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between December 2015 and November 2023. Notably, KIF5B-RET emerged as the most prevalent RET fusion partner, accounting for 59.4% of cases. Therapeutic interventions among these patients included specific targeted inhibitors such as Pralsetinib (48.4%), chemotherapy (34.3%), multi-target inhibitors (15.6%), and one case (1.6%) involving immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), Pralsetinib monotherapy demonstrated a median PFS of 16.03 months, outperforming chemotherapy (2.87 months; p < 0.0001), chemotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy (6.90 months; p = 0.048), and multi-target inhibitors (2.50 months; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the one-year and two-year overall survival (OS) rates for Pralsetinib monotherapy were 64.3% and 46.4%, respectively. Regarding safety, 71.0% of patients receiving Pralsetinib experienced at least one adverse event, with 45.2% classified as grade 3-4 in severity. Notably, no fatalities were attributed to adverse events. Common adverse events included hemoglobin reduction (35.5%) and neutropenia (32.3%), indicative of an overall favorable safety profile for Pralsetinib in this patient population.
Conclusion: This study encapsulates the research endeavors and treatment advancements of RET rearrangement solid tumors within the Chinese healthcare landscape, specifically highlighting the diverse real-world therapeutic approaches and their effectiveness in managing advanced RET rearrangement NSCLC among Chinese patients. Notably, targeted RET inhibitors like Pralsetinib have emerged as potent therapeutic agents, exhibiting remarkable efficacy and a manageable safety profile in this patient cohort. These findings underscore the potential of Pralsetinib and similar targeted therapies as novel treatment options for individuals with RET fusion-positive NSCLC.
期刊介绍:
BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.