Kevin G. C. Mizes, Jack Lindsey, G. Sean Escola, Bence P. Ölveczky
{"title":"运动皮层在运动序列执行中的作用取决于对灵活性的要求","authors":"Kevin G. C. Mizes, Jack Lindsey, G. Sean Escola, Bence P. Ölveczky","doi":"10.1038/s41593-024-01792-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The role of the motor cortex in executing motor sequences is widely debated, with studies supporting disparate views. Here we probe the degree to which the motor cortex’s engagement depends on task demands, specifically whether its role differs for highly practiced, or ‘automatic’, sequences versus flexible sequences informed by external cues. To test this, we trained rats to generate three-element motor sequences either by overtraining them on a single sequence or by having them follow instructive visual cues. Lesioning motor cortex showed that it is necessary for flexible cue-driven motor sequences but dispensable for single automatic behaviors trained in isolation. However, when an automatic motor sequence was practiced alongside the flexible task, it became motor cortex dependent, suggesting that an automatic motor sequence fails to consolidate subcortically when the same sequence is produced also in a flexible context. A simple neural network model recapitulated these results and offered a circuit-level explanation. Our results critically delineate the role of the motor cortex in motor sequence execution, describing the conditions under which it is engaged and the functions it fulfills, thus reconciling seemingly conflicting views about motor cortex’s role in motor sequence generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21,"journal":{"name":"ACS Nano","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of motor cortex in motor sequence execution depends on demands for flexibility\",\"authors\":\"Kevin G. C. Mizes, Jack Lindsey, G. Sean Escola, Bence P. Ölveczky\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41593-024-01792-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The role of the motor cortex in executing motor sequences is widely debated, with studies supporting disparate views. Here we probe the degree to which the motor cortex’s engagement depends on task demands, specifically whether its role differs for highly practiced, or ‘automatic’, sequences versus flexible sequences informed by external cues. To test this, we trained rats to generate three-element motor sequences either by overtraining them on a single sequence or by having them follow instructive visual cues. Lesioning motor cortex showed that it is necessary for flexible cue-driven motor sequences but dispensable for single automatic behaviors trained in isolation. However, when an automatic motor sequence was practiced alongside the flexible task, it became motor cortex dependent, suggesting that an automatic motor sequence fails to consolidate subcortically when the same sequence is produced also in a flexible context. A simple neural network model recapitulated these results and offered a circuit-level explanation. Our results critically delineate the role of the motor cortex in motor sequence execution, describing the conditions under which it is engaged and the functions it fulfills, thus reconciling seemingly conflicting views about motor cortex’s role in motor sequence generation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Nano\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Nano\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01792-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Nano","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01792-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of motor cortex in motor sequence execution depends on demands for flexibility
The role of the motor cortex in executing motor sequences is widely debated, with studies supporting disparate views. Here we probe the degree to which the motor cortex’s engagement depends on task demands, specifically whether its role differs for highly practiced, or ‘automatic’, sequences versus flexible sequences informed by external cues. To test this, we trained rats to generate three-element motor sequences either by overtraining them on a single sequence or by having them follow instructive visual cues. Lesioning motor cortex showed that it is necessary for flexible cue-driven motor sequences but dispensable for single automatic behaviors trained in isolation. However, when an automatic motor sequence was practiced alongside the flexible task, it became motor cortex dependent, suggesting that an automatic motor sequence fails to consolidate subcortically when the same sequence is produced also in a flexible context. A simple neural network model recapitulated these results and offered a circuit-level explanation. Our results critically delineate the role of the motor cortex in motor sequence execution, describing the conditions under which it is engaged and the functions it fulfills, thus reconciling seemingly conflicting views about motor cortex’s role in motor sequence generation.
期刊介绍:
ACS Nano, published monthly, serves as an international forum for comprehensive articles on nanoscience and nanotechnology research at the intersections of chemistry, biology, materials science, physics, and engineering. The journal fosters communication among scientists in these communities, facilitating collaboration, new research opportunities, and advancements through discoveries. ACS Nano covers synthesis, assembly, characterization, theory, and simulation of nanostructures, nanobiotechnology, nanofabrication, methods and tools for nanoscience and nanotechnology, and self- and directed-assembly. Alongside original research articles, it offers thorough reviews, perspectives on cutting-edge research, and discussions envisioning the future of nanoscience and nanotechnology.