{"title":"宽泛政策中的道德细微差别","authors":"Laura Haupt","doi":"10.1002/hast.4941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the September-October 2024 issue of the <i>Hastings Center Report</i>, two pieces examine attitudes toward and policy on medical aid in dying (MAID). An essay by Anna Elsner and colleagues analyzes terminology, including euphemistic language, used in Canada and other countries to refer to this practice. The authors recommend explicit public discussion of the values at stake in the use of this terminology. An article by Em Walsh concerns a subset of people who could become eligible for MAID under Canada's proposed expansion of eligibility for this assistance: people suffering from poverty-induced depression. Cautioning that the expansion of PAD could exacerbate inequality, Walsh offers six recommendations for policy-makers’ consideration. The issue's lead article, by Eric Juengst and colleagues, focuses on governance issues that could be raised by human genome editing research that aims to strengthen individuals’ resistance to disease beyond what is regarded as the human functional range. Juengst et al. identify and analyze three potential principles that could help policy-makers navigate what can be a blurry line between goals of prevention and enhancement in human genome editing research.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 5","pages":"inside_front_cover"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4941","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral Nuances in Broad Policies\",\"authors\":\"Laura Haupt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hast.4941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In the September-October 2024 issue of the <i>Hastings Center Report</i>, two pieces examine attitudes toward and policy on medical aid in dying (MAID). An essay by Anna Elsner and colleagues analyzes terminology, including euphemistic language, used in Canada and other countries to refer to this practice. The authors recommend explicit public discussion of the values at stake in the use of this terminology. An article by Em Walsh concerns a subset of people who could become eligible for MAID under Canada's proposed expansion of eligibility for this assistance: people suffering from poverty-induced depression. Cautioning that the expansion of PAD could exacerbate inequality, Walsh offers six recommendations for policy-makers’ consideration. The issue's lead article, by Eric Juengst and colleagues, focuses on governance issues that could be raised by human genome editing research that aims to strengthen individuals’ resistance to disease beyond what is regarded as the human functional range. Juengst et al. identify and analyze three potential principles that could help policy-makers navigate what can be a blurry line between goals of prevention and enhancement in human genome editing research.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"inside_front_cover\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4941\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4941\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4941","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在《黑斯廷斯中心报告》(Hastings Center Report)2024 年 9-10 月刊中,有两篇文章探讨了对临终医疗救助(MAID)的态度和政策。Anna Elsner 及其同事撰写的一篇文章分析了加拿大和其他国家在提及这种做法时使用的术语,包括委婉的语言。作者建议就使用这些术语时所涉及的价值观进行明确的公开讨论。Em Walsh 的一篇文章关注的是,根据加拿大扩大 MAID 援助资格的建议,可能有资格获得 MAID 援助的一部分人:即因贫困而患抑郁症的人。沃尔什警告说,扩大 PAD 可能会加剧不平等,并提出了六项建议供政策制定者考虑。本期的头条文章由埃里克-朱恩斯特(Eric Juengst)及其同事撰写,重点探讨了人类基因组编辑研究可能引发的治理问题,该研究旨在加强个人对疾病的抵抗力,使其超出人类功能范围。Juengst 等人确定并分析了三项潜在原则,这些原则可以帮助政策制定者把握人类基因组编辑研究中预防和增强目标之间的模糊界限。
In the September-October 2024 issue of the Hastings Center Report, two pieces examine attitudes toward and policy on medical aid in dying (MAID). An essay by Anna Elsner and colleagues analyzes terminology, including euphemistic language, used in Canada and other countries to refer to this practice. The authors recommend explicit public discussion of the values at stake in the use of this terminology. An article by Em Walsh concerns a subset of people who could become eligible for MAID under Canada's proposed expansion of eligibility for this assistance: people suffering from poverty-induced depression. Cautioning that the expansion of PAD could exacerbate inequality, Walsh offers six recommendations for policy-makers’ consideration. The issue's lead article, by Eric Juengst and colleagues, focuses on governance issues that could be raised by human genome editing research that aims to strengthen individuals’ resistance to disease beyond what is regarded as the human functional range. Juengst et al. identify and analyze three potential principles that could help policy-makers navigate what can be a blurry line between goals of prevention and enhancement in human genome editing research.
期刊介绍:
The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.