{"title":"采用阴离子交换膜的二氧化碳电解器基于膜气体分离的二氧化碳回收装置的概念设计和评估","authors":"Hyunshin Lee , Wonsuk Chung , Kosan Roh","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anion exchange membrane (AEM)-based electrolysis for CO<sub>2</sub> reduction reaction (CO<sub>2</sub>RR) has garnered attention as a promising carbon dioxide utilization technology due to its superior energy efficiency at high current densities. The major drawback of AEM-based electrolysis for CO<sub>2</sub>RR is CO<sub>2</sub> crossover, which leads to the loss of introduced CO<sub>2</sub> feedstock and thus detrimentally affects the process's overall economic and environmental viability. We design a 3-stage membrane-based CO<sub>2</sub> recovery unit to capture CO<sub>2</sub> from the mixture of CO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> discharged from the anode side of AEM-based CO<sub>2</sub> electrolyzers. The membrane area is optimized via a hybrid of genetic algorithm and ‘fmincon’ in MATLAB. The estimated CO<sub>2</sub> capture cost ranges from 43.3 to 109.3 USD/tCO<sub>2</sub>, which is economically comparable to piperazine-based amine scrubbing units when recovering CO<sub>2</sub> at a purity of up to 99.5 mol.% under a CO<sub>2</sub>/O<sub>2</sub> molar ratio of 1.5∼2. The carbon footprint of the designed process ranges from −0.936 to −0.838 tCO<sub>2</sub>eq/tCO<sub>2</sub>-captured, indicating superior environmental performance compared to those of the piperazine-based amine scrubbing units.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 104278"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptual design and evaluation of membrane gas separation-based CO2 recovery unit for CO2 electrolyzers employing anion exchange membranes\",\"authors\":\"Hyunshin Lee , Wonsuk Chung , Kosan Roh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Anion exchange membrane (AEM)-based electrolysis for CO<sub>2</sub> reduction reaction (CO<sub>2</sub>RR) has garnered attention as a promising carbon dioxide utilization technology due to its superior energy efficiency at high current densities. The major drawback of AEM-based electrolysis for CO<sub>2</sub>RR is CO<sub>2</sub> crossover, which leads to the loss of introduced CO<sub>2</sub> feedstock and thus detrimentally affects the process's overall economic and environmental viability. We design a 3-stage membrane-based CO<sub>2</sub> recovery unit to capture CO<sub>2</sub> from the mixture of CO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> discharged from the anode side of AEM-based CO<sub>2</sub> electrolyzers. The membrane area is optimized via a hybrid of genetic algorithm and ‘fmincon’ in MATLAB. The estimated CO<sub>2</sub> capture cost ranges from 43.3 to 109.3 USD/tCO<sub>2</sub>, which is economically comparable to piperazine-based amine scrubbing units when recovering CO<sub>2</sub> at a purity of up to 99.5 mol.% under a CO<sub>2</sub>/O<sub>2</sub> molar ratio of 1.5∼2. The carbon footprint of the designed process ranges from −0.936 to −0.838 tCO<sub>2</sub>eq/tCO<sub>2</sub>-captured, indicating superior environmental performance compared to those of the piperazine-based amine scrubbing units.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624002214\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624002214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Conceptual design and evaluation of membrane gas separation-based CO2 recovery unit for CO2 electrolyzers employing anion exchange membranes
Anion exchange membrane (AEM)-based electrolysis for CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) has garnered attention as a promising carbon dioxide utilization technology due to its superior energy efficiency at high current densities. The major drawback of AEM-based electrolysis for CO2RR is CO2 crossover, which leads to the loss of introduced CO2 feedstock and thus detrimentally affects the process's overall economic and environmental viability. We design a 3-stage membrane-based CO2 recovery unit to capture CO2 from the mixture of CO2 and O2 discharged from the anode side of AEM-based CO2 electrolyzers. The membrane area is optimized via a hybrid of genetic algorithm and ‘fmincon’ in MATLAB. The estimated CO2 capture cost ranges from 43.3 to 109.3 USD/tCO2, which is economically comparable to piperazine-based amine scrubbing units when recovering CO2 at a purity of up to 99.5 mol.% under a CO2/O2 molar ratio of 1.5∼2. The carbon footprint of the designed process ranges from −0.936 to −0.838 tCO2eq/tCO2-captured, indicating superior environmental performance compared to those of the piperazine-based amine scrubbing units.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.