Stephen J. DiMartino , Jingning Mei , Thomas J. Schnitzer , Haitao Gao , Simon Eng , Christine Winslow , Tina Ho , Kenneth C. Turner , Hazem E. Hassan , Yamini Patel , John D. Davis , Ngan Trinh , Angela Manley , Garen Manvelian , Michael Fetell , Ned Braunstein , Gregory P. Geba , Paula Dakin
{"title":"评估法舒单抗对膝关节或髋关节骨性关节炎疼痛患者长期安全性和疗效的 III 期研究","authors":"Stephen J. DiMartino , Jingning Mei , Thomas J. Schnitzer , Haitao Gao , Simon Eng , Christine Winslow , Tina Ho , Kenneth C. Turner , Hazem E. Hassan , Yamini Patel , John D. Davis , Ngan Trinh , Angela Manley , Garen Manvelian , Michael Fetell , Ned Braunstein , Gregory P. Geba , Paula Dakin","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA) is frequently disabling; treatments are often ineffective or intolerable. Fasinumab selectively inhibits nerve-growth factor and has shown efficacy for the management of OA pain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this randomized, double-blind, phase III safety study, patients with moderate-to-severe OA pain and history of inadequate pain relief received placebo or fasinumab (at 1, 3, 6, and 9 mg every 4 weeks [Q4W] and 1 and 6 mg every 8 weeks [Q8W] for 52 weeks). Primary safety endpoints included adverse events, adjudicated arthropathies (AAs), and joint replacements (JRs). Co-primary endpoints of an efficacy sub-study were change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and physical function scores. During the study, higher fasinumab doses were discontinued for safety; 1 mg doses continued.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 13,945 patients screened, 5331 were randomized; 1074 were included in the efficacy sub-study. AAs and JRs occurred in all groups. Increased severity of disease at baseline was associated with higher rates of AAs and JRs. A dose-dependent risk of AA or JR was observed for fasinumab; in the 1 mg groups, only a small percentage of patients with JR had prior AA. Fasinumab significantly improved WOMAC pain and physical function scores compared with placebo; least squares mean differences versus placebo were −1.22 and −1.20 for 1 mg Q4W and −0.73 and −0.74 for 1 mg Q8W, respectively (<em>P<</em>0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AAs and JRs showed a dose relationship to fasinumab and were associated with baseline OA status. Fasinumab achieved statistically significant improvements in WOMAC pain and physical function scores compared with placebo.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"6 4","pages":"Article 100533"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A phase III study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of fasinumab in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee or hip\",\"authors\":\"Stephen J. DiMartino , Jingning Mei , Thomas J. Schnitzer , Haitao Gao , Simon Eng , Christine Winslow , Tina Ho , Kenneth C. Turner , Hazem E. Hassan , Yamini Patel , John D. Davis , Ngan Trinh , Angela Manley , Garen Manvelian , Michael Fetell , Ned Braunstein , Gregory P. Geba , Paula Dakin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA) is frequently disabling; treatments are often ineffective or intolerable. Fasinumab selectively inhibits nerve-growth factor and has shown efficacy for the management of OA pain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this randomized, double-blind, phase III safety study, patients with moderate-to-severe OA pain and history of inadequate pain relief received placebo or fasinumab (at 1, 3, 6, and 9 mg every 4 weeks [Q4W] and 1 and 6 mg every 8 weeks [Q8W] for 52 weeks). Primary safety endpoints included adverse events, adjudicated arthropathies (AAs), and joint replacements (JRs). Co-primary endpoints of an efficacy sub-study were change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and physical function scores. During the study, higher fasinumab doses were discontinued for safety; 1 mg doses continued.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 13,945 patients screened, 5331 were randomized; 1074 were included in the efficacy sub-study. AAs and JRs occurred in all groups. Increased severity of disease at baseline was associated with higher rates of AAs and JRs. A dose-dependent risk of AA or JR was observed for fasinumab; in the 1 mg groups, only a small percentage of patients with JR had prior AA. Fasinumab significantly improved WOMAC pain and physical function scores compared with placebo; least squares mean differences versus placebo were −1.22 and −1.20 for 1 mg Q4W and −0.73 and −0.74 for 1 mg Q8W, respectively (<em>P<</em>0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AAs and JRs showed a dose relationship to fasinumab and were associated with baseline OA status. Fasinumab achieved statistically significant improvements in WOMAC pain and physical function scores compared with placebo.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913124001006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913124001006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与骨关节炎(OA)相关的疼痛常常使人丧失工作能力,而治疗往往无效或无法忍受。方法在这项随机、双盲、III期安全性研究中,中度至重度OA疼痛且疼痛缓解不足的患者接受安慰剂或法舒单抗治疗(每4周[Q4W]1、3、6和9毫克,每8周[Q8W]1和6毫克,共52周)。主要安全性终点包括不良事件、判定的关节病(AA)和关节置换(JR)。疗效子研究的共同主要终点是西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛和身体功能评分的变化。研究期间,出于安全性考虑,停用了较高剂量的法西奴单抗;1 毫克剂量的法西奴单抗继续使用。所有组别都出现了AA和JR。基线时疾病严重程度的增加与较高的 AA 和 JR 发生率有关。观察到法西奴单抗的AA或JR风险与剂量有关;在1毫克组中,只有一小部分JR患者曾有过AA。与安慰剂相比,法舒单抗能明显改善WOMAC疼痛和身体功能评分;与安慰剂相比,1 mg Q4W的最小二乘法均差分别为-1.22和-1.20,1 mg Q8W的最小二乘法均差分别为-0.73和-0.74(P<0.001)。与安慰剂相比,法舒单抗对WOMAC疼痛和身体功能评分的改善具有统计学意义。
A phase III study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of fasinumab in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee or hip
Background
Pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA) is frequently disabling; treatments are often ineffective or intolerable. Fasinumab selectively inhibits nerve-growth factor and has shown efficacy for the management of OA pain.
Methods
In this randomized, double-blind, phase III safety study, patients with moderate-to-severe OA pain and history of inadequate pain relief received placebo or fasinumab (at 1, 3, 6, and 9 mg every 4 weeks [Q4W] and 1 and 6 mg every 8 weeks [Q8W] for 52 weeks). Primary safety endpoints included adverse events, adjudicated arthropathies (AAs), and joint replacements (JRs). Co-primary endpoints of an efficacy sub-study were change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and physical function scores. During the study, higher fasinumab doses were discontinued for safety; 1 mg doses continued.
Results
Of 13,945 patients screened, 5331 were randomized; 1074 were included in the efficacy sub-study. AAs and JRs occurred in all groups. Increased severity of disease at baseline was associated with higher rates of AAs and JRs. A dose-dependent risk of AA or JR was observed for fasinumab; in the 1 mg groups, only a small percentage of patients with JR had prior AA. Fasinumab significantly improved WOMAC pain and physical function scores compared with placebo; least squares mean differences versus placebo were −1.22 and −1.20 for 1 mg Q4W and −0.73 and −0.74 for 1 mg Q8W, respectively (P<0.001).
Conclusion
AAs and JRs showed a dose relationship to fasinumab and were associated with baseline OA status. Fasinumab achieved statistically significant improvements in WOMAC pain and physical function scores compared with placebo.