初级保健远程医疗访问与社会经济弱势糖尿病患者更早地接受眼科护理有关

Peter J. Weng , Jamie J. Karl , Hemal Patel , Ariana Allen , Jullia Rosdahl , Stefanie Schuman
{"title":"初级保健远程医疗访问与社会经济弱势糖尿病患者更早地接受眼科护理有关","authors":"Peter J. Weng ,&nbsp;Jamie J. Karl ,&nbsp;Hemal Patel ,&nbsp;Ariana Allen ,&nbsp;Jullia Rosdahl ,&nbsp;Stefanie Schuman","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To identify factors associated with an ophthalmology visit in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), particularly among patients with high socioeconomic vulnerability (SeV).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Comparative utilization analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of the Duke Epic Database was performed on outpatient visits with a T2DM diagnosis between January 1, 2019 and January 1, 2024. Patients were included if they were over the age of 18 and had a subsequent outpatient visit 1 year after their first documented visit. Age, race, sex, hemoglobin a1c values, zip codes of residence and outpatient primary care clinic, and usage of primary care telehealth visits and nutrition services were also collected. SeV scores were calculated from the Social Vulnerability Index, established by the CDC. Logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios for health care services on the first ophthalmology visit and diabetic retinopathy diagnoses at first visit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 42,151 patients with T2DM, 12,491 (29.6 %) visited an ophthalmology clinic. 35.6 % (3,677/10,338) of the lowest SeV quartile (least vulnerable) and 26.3 % (2,821/10,716) of the highest SeV quartile (most vulnerable) visited an ophthalmology clinic. In both SeV quartiles, primary care telehealth visits and nutrition services were associated with an increased odds of ophthalmology visit (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Odds of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) at first ophthalmology visit were 75 % higher in the highest SeV quartile compared to the lowest SeV quartile (95 % CI: 1.29–2.38, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). When SeV quartiles were evaluated separately, telehealth was associated with significantly reduced odds of PDR at initial ophthalmology visit in only the highest SeV quartile (<em>p</em> = 0.03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found that primary care telehealth visits are associated with both an increased odds of visiting an ophthalmology clinic and a reduced odds of PDR at this first visit in patients who reside in areas with the highest levels of socioeconomic vulnerability. Additional studies on telehealth services, especially in patients with high SeV, are warranted and could help to improve understanding of the role of technology in screening for diabetic retinopathy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary care telehealth visits are associated with earlier eye care in diabetic patients with high socioeconomic vulnerability\",\"authors\":\"Peter J. Weng ,&nbsp;Jamie J. Karl ,&nbsp;Hemal Patel ,&nbsp;Ariana Allen ,&nbsp;Jullia Rosdahl ,&nbsp;Stefanie Schuman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To identify factors associated with an ophthalmology visit in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), particularly among patients with high socioeconomic vulnerability (SeV).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Comparative utilization analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of the Duke Epic Database was performed on outpatient visits with a T2DM diagnosis between January 1, 2019 and January 1, 2024. Patients were included if they were over the age of 18 and had a subsequent outpatient visit 1 year after their first documented visit. Age, race, sex, hemoglobin a1c values, zip codes of residence and outpatient primary care clinic, and usage of primary care telehealth visits and nutrition services were also collected. SeV scores were calculated from the Social Vulnerability Index, established by the CDC. Logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios for health care services on the first ophthalmology visit and diabetic retinopathy diagnoses at first visit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 42,151 patients with T2DM, 12,491 (29.6 %) visited an ophthalmology clinic. 35.6 % (3,677/10,338) of the lowest SeV quartile (least vulnerable) and 26.3 % (2,821/10,716) of the highest SeV quartile (most vulnerable) visited an ophthalmology clinic. In both SeV quartiles, primary care telehealth visits and nutrition services were associated with an increased odds of ophthalmology visit (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Odds of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) at first ophthalmology visit were 75 % higher in the highest SeV quartile compared to the lowest SeV quartile (95 % CI: 1.29–2.38, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). When SeV quartiles were evaluated separately, telehealth was associated with significantly reduced odds of PDR at initial ophthalmology visit in only the highest SeV quartile (<em>p</em> = 0.03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found that primary care telehealth visits are associated with both an increased odds of visiting an ophthalmology clinic and a reduced odds of PDR at this first visit in patients who reside in areas with the highest levels of socioeconomic vulnerability. Additional studies on telehealth services, especially in patients with high SeV, are warranted and could help to improve understanding of the role of technology in screening for diabetic retinopathy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJO International\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJO International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者,尤其是社会经济弱势(SeV)患者眼科就诊的相关因素。方法对2019年1月1日至2024年1月1日期间诊断为T2DM的门诊患者进行杜克大学Epic数据库回顾性审查。如果患者年满 18 周岁,并在首次记录就诊 1 年后进行了后续门诊就诊,则将其纳入研究范围。此外,还收集了年龄、种族、性别、血红蛋白 a1c 值、居住地和初级保健门诊的邮政编码,以及初级保健远程医疗就诊和营养服务的使用情况。SeV 分数是根据疾病预防控制中心制定的社会脆弱性指数计算得出的。结果 在 42,151 名 T2DM 患者中,12,491 人(29.6%)前往眼科诊所就诊。在 SeV 值最低的四分位数(最不容易患病)中,35.6%(3677/10338)的患者到眼科门诊就诊;在 SeV 值最高的四分位数(最容易患病)中,26.3%(2821/10716)的患者到眼科门诊就诊。在两个 SeV 四分位数中,初级保健远程保健就诊和营养服务与眼科就诊几率的增加有关(p < 0.001)。与 SeV 四分位数最低者相比,SeV 四分位数最高者首次眼科就诊时发生增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变 (PDR) 的几率高出 75%(95 % CI:1.29-2.38,p < 0.001)。结论我们发现,对于居住在社会经济脆弱程度最高地区的患者来说,初级保健远程医疗就诊与眼科诊所就诊几率的增加和首次就诊时 PDR 几率的降低有关。有必要对远程保健服务进行更多的研究,尤其是针对高 SeV 患者的研究,这将有助于更好地了解技术在糖尿病视网膜病变筛查中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary care telehealth visits are associated with earlier eye care in diabetic patients with high socioeconomic vulnerability

Purpose

To identify factors associated with an ophthalmology visit in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), particularly among patients with high socioeconomic vulnerability (SeV).

Design

Comparative utilization analysis.

Methods

A retrospective review of the Duke Epic Database was performed on outpatient visits with a T2DM diagnosis between January 1, 2019 and January 1, 2024. Patients were included if they were over the age of 18 and had a subsequent outpatient visit 1 year after their first documented visit. Age, race, sex, hemoglobin a1c values, zip codes of residence and outpatient primary care clinic, and usage of primary care telehealth visits and nutrition services were also collected. SeV scores were calculated from the Social Vulnerability Index, established by the CDC. Logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios for health care services on the first ophthalmology visit and diabetic retinopathy diagnoses at first visit.

Results

Of the 42,151 patients with T2DM, 12,491 (29.6 %) visited an ophthalmology clinic. 35.6 % (3,677/10,338) of the lowest SeV quartile (least vulnerable) and 26.3 % (2,821/10,716) of the highest SeV quartile (most vulnerable) visited an ophthalmology clinic. In both SeV quartiles, primary care telehealth visits and nutrition services were associated with an increased odds of ophthalmology visit (p < 0.001). Odds of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) at first ophthalmology visit were 75 % higher in the highest SeV quartile compared to the lowest SeV quartile (95 % CI: 1.29–2.38, p < 0.001). When SeV quartiles were evaluated separately, telehealth was associated with significantly reduced odds of PDR at initial ophthalmology visit in only the highest SeV quartile (p = 0.03).

Conclusion

We found that primary care telehealth visits are associated with both an increased odds of visiting an ophthalmology clinic and a reduced odds of PDR at this first visit in patients who reside in areas with the highest levels of socioeconomic vulnerability. Additional studies on telehealth services, especially in patients with high SeV, are warranted and could help to improve understanding of the role of technology in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信