假体周围关节感染中的血清和滑膜炎症标记物分析:叙述性综述。

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.72821
Amit K Yadav, Siddhartha Murhekar, Ece N Cinar
{"title":"假体周围关节感染中的血清和滑膜炎症标记物分析:叙述性综述。","authors":"Amit K Yadav, Siddhartha Murhekar, Ece N Cinar","doi":"10.7759/cureus.72821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is considered a rare but devastating complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The problem lies in the fact that there is a paucity of \"gold standard\" diagnostic tests that make the diagnosis of PJI extremely challenging. Recently, there have been increasing evidence-based guidelines that have been introduced to standardise the approach to a patient with a suspected PJI. Diagnosing a case of PJI traditionally involves initial screening for elevated serum inflammation markers C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dL) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and aspiration remains the sole confirmatory investigation. However, several factors would affect the values of the aforementioned markers, such as gender, age, and the presence of inflammatory circumstances. Serum D-dimer that detects fibrinolytic activities during infection has high sensitivity, but the specificity was not persuasive as it would elevate during other conditions, such as venous thromboembolism. Therefore, there is also a need for a simultaneous and secondary marker. There are also several synovial biomarkers, including ESR, CRP, alpha-defensin, and synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the detection of PJI. In this narrative review, we want to sum up the serum and inflammatory markers that have been introduced so far for detecting PJI.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Serum and Synovial Inflammatory Markers in Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Amit K Yadav, Siddhartha Murhekar, Ece N Cinar\",\"doi\":\"10.7759/cureus.72821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is considered a rare but devastating complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The problem lies in the fact that there is a paucity of \\\"gold standard\\\" diagnostic tests that make the diagnosis of PJI extremely challenging. Recently, there have been increasing evidence-based guidelines that have been introduced to standardise the approach to a patient with a suspected PJI. Diagnosing a case of PJI traditionally involves initial screening for elevated serum inflammation markers C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dL) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and aspiration remains the sole confirmatory investigation. However, several factors would affect the values of the aforementioned markers, such as gender, age, and the presence of inflammatory circumstances. Serum D-dimer that detects fibrinolytic activities during infection has high sensitivity, but the specificity was not persuasive as it would elevate during other conditions, such as venous thromboembolism. Therefore, there is also a need for a simultaneous and secondary marker. There are also several synovial biomarkers, including ESR, CRP, alpha-defensin, and synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the detection of PJI. In this narrative review, we want to sum up the serum and inflammatory markers that have been introduced so far for detecting PJI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cureus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528397/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cureus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72821\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

假体周围关节感染(PJI)被认为是全关节成形术(TJA)后一种罕见但具有破坏性的并发症。问题在于缺乏 "金标准 "诊断测试,这使得 PJI 的诊断极具挑战性。最近,越来越多的循证指南被引入,以规范对疑似 PJI 患者的处理方法。诊断 PJI 病例的传统方法是初步筛查血清炎症指标 C 反应蛋白(CRP)(毫克/分升)和红细胞沉降率(ESR)是否升高,抽吸仍是唯一的确诊检查方法。然而,有几个因素会影响上述指标的数值,如性别、年龄和是否存在炎症情况。在感染期间检测纤维蛋白溶解活动的血清 D-二聚体具有较高的灵敏度,但特异性不强,因为在静脉血栓栓塞等其他情况下会升高。因此,还需要一种同步的辅助标记物。还有几种滑膜生物标记物,包括血沉、CRP、α-防御素、滑膜液白细胞计数和差值,可用于检测 PJI。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们将总结迄今为止用于检测 PJI 的血清和炎症标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Serum and Synovial Inflammatory Markers in Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Narrative Review.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is considered a rare but devastating complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The problem lies in the fact that there is a paucity of "gold standard" diagnostic tests that make the diagnosis of PJI extremely challenging. Recently, there have been increasing evidence-based guidelines that have been introduced to standardise the approach to a patient with a suspected PJI. Diagnosing a case of PJI traditionally involves initial screening for elevated serum inflammation markers C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dL) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and aspiration remains the sole confirmatory investigation. However, several factors would affect the values of the aforementioned markers, such as gender, age, and the presence of inflammatory circumstances. Serum D-dimer that detects fibrinolytic activities during infection has high sensitivity, but the specificity was not persuasive as it would elevate during other conditions, such as venous thromboembolism. Therefore, there is also a need for a simultaneous and secondary marker. There are also several synovial biomarkers, including ESR, CRP, alpha-defensin, and synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the detection of PJI. In this narrative review, we want to sum up the serum and inflammatory markers that have been introduced so far for detecting PJI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信