通过免疫磁还原测定和临床测量评估帕金森病痴呆症和路易体痴呆症的生物标记物

IF 2.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/ADR-240110
Giovanni R Malaty, Boris Decourt, Holly A Shill, Marwan N Sabbagh
{"title":"通过免疫磁还原测定和临床测量评估帕金森病痴呆症和路易体痴呆症的生物标记物","authors":"Giovanni R Malaty, Boris Decourt, Holly A Shill, Marwan N Sabbagh","doi":"10.3233/ADR-240110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasma biomarker assays provide an opportunity to reassess whether Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) plasma biomarkers are diagnostically useful.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We hypothesized that immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) of plasma biomarkers could differentiate between patients with PDD and DLB and healthy patients when combined with established clinical testing measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plasma samples from 61 participants (12 PDD, 12 DLB, 37 controls) were analyzed using IMR to quantify amyloid-β 42 (Aβ<sub>42</sub>), total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 (p-tau181), and α-synuclein (α-syn). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to obtain sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve. Biomarker results were combined with clinical measures from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Hoehn-Yahr stage to optimize diagnostic test performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with PDD had higher α-syn than those with DLB and healthy participants and were distinguishable by their biomarker products Aβ<sub>42</sub>×p-tau181 and Aβ<sub>42</sub>×α-syn. Patients with DLB had higher p-tau181 than those with PDD and healthy participants and were distinguishable by their concentrations of α-syn×p-tau181. Plasma α-syn plus UPDRS versus either test alone increased sensitivity, specificity, and AUC when healthy patients were compared with those with PDD and DLB. Combined clinical examination scores and plasma biomarker products demonstrated utility in differentiating PDD from DLB when p-tau181 was combined with UPDRS, α-syn was combined with UPDRS, and α-syn×p-tau181 was combined with UPDRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, IMR plasma p-tau181 and α-syn may discriminate between PDD and DLB when used in conjunction with clinical testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":73594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","volume":"8 1","pages":"1361-1371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomarker Assessment in Parkinson's Disease Dementia and Dementia with Lewy Bodies by the Immunomagnetic Reduction Assay and Clinical Measures.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni R Malaty, Boris Decourt, Holly A Shill, Marwan N Sabbagh\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/ADR-240110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasma biomarker assays provide an opportunity to reassess whether Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) plasma biomarkers are diagnostically useful.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We hypothesized that immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) of plasma biomarkers could differentiate between patients with PDD and DLB and healthy patients when combined with established clinical testing measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plasma samples from 61 participants (12 PDD, 12 DLB, 37 controls) were analyzed using IMR to quantify amyloid-β 42 (Aβ<sub>42</sub>), total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 (p-tau181), and α-synuclein (α-syn). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to obtain sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve. Biomarker results were combined with clinical measures from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Hoehn-Yahr stage to optimize diagnostic test performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with PDD had higher α-syn than those with DLB and healthy participants and were distinguishable by their biomarker products Aβ<sub>42</sub>×p-tau181 and Aβ<sub>42</sub>×α-syn. Patients with DLB had higher p-tau181 than those with PDD and healthy participants and were distinguishable by their concentrations of α-syn×p-tau181. Plasma α-syn plus UPDRS versus either test alone increased sensitivity, specificity, and AUC when healthy patients were compared with those with PDD and DLB. Combined clinical examination scores and plasma biomarker products demonstrated utility in differentiating PDD from DLB when p-tau181 was combined with UPDRS, α-syn was combined with UPDRS, and α-syn×p-tau181 was combined with UPDRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, IMR plasma p-tau181 and α-syn may discriminate between PDD and DLB when used in conjunction with clinical testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1361-1371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530035/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-240110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-240110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血浆生物标志物检测为重新评估阿尔茨海默病、帕金森病痴呆(PDD)和路易体痴呆(DLB)血浆生物标志物是否具有诊断价值提供了机会:我们假设血浆生物标记物的免疫磁还原(IMR)与既有的临床检测方法相结合,可以区分帕金森病痴呆症和路易体痴呆症患者与健康患者:采用免疫磁还原法对61名参与者(12名PDD患者、12名DLB患者和37名对照组患者)的血浆样本进行分析,以量化淀粉样β 42(Aβ42)、总tau(t-tau)、苏氨酸181磷酸化tau(p-tau181)和α-突触核蛋白(α-syn)。利用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析得出灵敏度、特异性和 ROC 曲线下面积。生物标记物结果与统一帕金森病评分量表(UPDRS)、蒙特利尔认知评估和Hoehn-Yahr分期的临床指标相结合,以优化诊断测试的性能:与DLB患者和健康人相比,PDD患者的α-syn含量更高,并可通过生物标记物产物Aβ42×p-tau181和Aβ42×α-syn加以区分。DLB患者的p-tau181浓度高于PDD患者和健康参与者,并可通过α-syn×p-tau181的浓度加以区分。当健康患者与PDD和DLB患者进行比较时,血浆α-syn加上UPDRS与单独使用其中一种检测方法相比,灵敏度、特异性和AUC都有所提高。当p-tau181与UPDRS相结合、α-syn与UPDRS相结合、α-syn×p-tau181与UPDRS相结合时,综合临床检查评分和血浆生物标志物产品在区分PDD和DLB方面显示出效用:在这项试验研究中,IMR血浆p-tau181和α-syn与临床检测结合使用时,可区分PDD和DLB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomarker Assessment in Parkinson's Disease Dementia and Dementia with Lewy Bodies by the Immunomagnetic Reduction Assay and Clinical Measures.

Background: Plasma biomarker assays provide an opportunity to reassess whether Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) plasma biomarkers are diagnostically useful.

Objective: We hypothesized that immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) of plasma biomarkers could differentiate between patients with PDD and DLB and healthy patients when combined with established clinical testing measures.

Methods: Plasma samples from 61 participants (12 PDD, 12 DLB, 37 controls) were analyzed using IMR to quantify amyloid-β 42 (Aβ42), total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 (p-tau181), and α-synuclein (α-syn). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to obtain sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve. Biomarker results were combined with clinical measures from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Hoehn-Yahr stage to optimize diagnostic test performance.

Results: Participants with PDD had higher α-syn than those with DLB and healthy participants and were distinguishable by their biomarker products Aβ42×p-tau181 and Aβ42×α-syn. Patients with DLB had higher p-tau181 than those with PDD and healthy participants and were distinguishable by their concentrations of α-syn×p-tau181. Plasma α-syn plus UPDRS versus either test alone increased sensitivity, specificity, and AUC when healthy patients were compared with those with PDD and DLB. Combined clinical examination scores and plasma biomarker products demonstrated utility in differentiating PDD from DLB when p-tau181 was combined with UPDRS, α-syn was combined with UPDRS, and α-syn×p-tau181 was combined with UPDRS.

Conclusions: In this pilot study, IMR plasma p-tau181 and α-syn may discriminate between PDD and DLB when used in conjunction with clinical testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信