卡曼套管中残留的组织碎片对异常子宫出血组织病理学诊断的影响

Omer Tammo, Elif Celik, Enes Celik, Denizhan Bayramoglu, Suleyman Yildiz
{"title":"卡曼套管中残留的组织碎片对异常子宫出血组织病理学诊断的影响","authors":"Omer Tammo, Elif Celik, Enes Celik, Denizhan Bayramoglu, Suleyman Yildiz","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.11.1390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to perform histopathological analysis of residual material in the cannula by endometrial sampling using a Carmen injector, and to compare the results. The study was conducted in the Department of Gynaecology, Mardin Training and Research Hospital, Artuklu/Mardin, Turkiye, from December 2021 to June 2022. The study group consisted of 104 patients who presented to the outpatient clinic with complaints of abnormal uterine bleeding. Endometrial curettage material was collected from all patients using a Carmen injector. The collected material was discharged into the pathology container (Group 1). Subsequently, the residual material remaining in the injector was placed in a separate pathology container (Group 2). Specimens were sent to the pathology laboratory with buffered formol. The pathological evaluation was performed by the same pathologist without revealing the patients' names. Comparative histopathological results of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 were found to be fully compatible in 64.4% of the patients. In 35.6% of the patients, the histopathological results were different from each other between Group 1 and Group 2. Pathological results were different from each other in 21.2% of patients with incompatible pathology results. In Group 1, 16.7% of the patients were over-diagnosed, while 7.7% of the patients were over-diagnosed in Group 2. It would be beneficial to carefully remove the material remaining in the cannula and send it for pathological examination as it may affect the histopathological results. Key Words: Abnormal uterine bleeding, Probe curettage, Karman cannula, Histopathological evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"34 11","pages":"1390-1392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Tissue Fragments Remain in the Karman Cannula on the Histopathological Diagnosis of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.\",\"authors\":\"Omer Tammo, Elif Celik, Enes Celik, Denizhan Bayramoglu, Suleyman Yildiz\",\"doi\":\"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.11.1390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to perform histopathological analysis of residual material in the cannula by endometrial sampling using a Carmen injector, and to compare the results. The study was conducted in the Department of Gynaecology, Mardin Training and Research Hospital, Artuklu/Mardin, Turkiye, from December 2021 to June 2022. The study group consisted of 104 patients who presented to the outpatient clinic with complaints of abnormal uterine bleeding. Endometrial curettage material was collected from all patients using a Carmen injector. The collected material was discharged into the pathology container (Group 1). Subsequently, the residual material remaining in the injector was placed in a separate pathology container (Group 2). Specimens were sent to the pathology laboratory with buffered formol. The pathological evaluation was performed by the same pathologist without revealing the patients' names. Comparative histopathological results of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 were found to be fully compatible in 64.4% of the patients. In 35.6% of the patients, the histopathological results were different from each other between Group 1 and Group 2. Pathological results were different from each other in 21.2% of patients with incompatible pathology results. In Group 1, 16.7% of the patients were over-diagnosed, while 7.7% of the patients were over-diagnosed in Group 2. It would be beneficial to carefully remove the material remaining in the cannula and send it for pathological examination as it may affect the histopathological results. Key Words: Abnormal uterine bleeding, Probe curettage, Karman cannula, Histopathological evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP\",\"volume\":\"34 11\",\"pages\":\"1390-1392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.11.1390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.11.1390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过使用卡门注射器进行子宫内膜取样,对套管中的残留物进行组织病理学分析,并对结果进行比较。研究于 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 6 月在土耳其阿尔图克鲁/马尔丁的马尔丁培训与研究医院妇科进行。研究对象包括104名因异常子宫出血而到门诊就诊的患者。使用卡门注射器收集所有患者的子宫内膜刮除材料。收集到的材料被排放到病理容器中(第 1 组)。随后,残留在注射器中的材料被放入一个单独的病理容器中(第 2 组)。标本用缓冲甲醇送至病理实验室。病理评估由同一病理学家进行,不透露患者姓名。第 1 组和第 2 组患者的组织病理学结果对比显示,64.4% 的患者完全吻合。35.6%的患者的组织病理学结果在第一组和第二组之间存在差异。21.2%的患者病理结果不一致。在第一组中,16.7%的患者被过度诊断,而在第二组中,7.7%的患者被过度诊断。 小心清除插管中残留的物质并送去做病理检查是有益的,因为这可能会影响组织病理学结果。关键字异常子宫出血 探针刮宫 卡曼套管 组织病理学评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Tissue Fragments Remain in the Karman Cannula on the Histopathological Diagnosis of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.

The aim of this study was to perform histopathological analysis of residual material in the cannula by endometrial sampling using a Carmen injector, and to compare the results. The study was conducted in the Department of Gynaecology, Mardin Training and Research Hospital, Artuklu/Mardin, Turkiye, from December 2021 to June 2022. The study group consisted of 104 patients who presented to the outpatient clinic with complaints of abnormal uterine bleeding. Endometrial curettage material was collected from all patients using a Carmen injector. The collected material was discharged into the pathology container (Group 1). Subsequently, the residual material remaining in the injector was placed in a separate pathology container (Group 2). Specimens were sent to the pathology laboratory with buffered formol. The pathological evaluation was performed by the same pathologist without revealing the patients' names. Comparative histopathological results of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 were found to be fully compatible in 64.4% of the patients. In 35.6% of the patients, the histopathological results were different from each other between Group 1 and Group 2. Pathological results were different from each other in 21.2% of patients with incompatible pathology results. In Group 1, 16.7% of the patients were over-diagnosed, while 7.7% of the patients were over-diagnosed in Group 2. It would be beneficial to carefully remove the material remaining in the cannula and send it for pathological examination as it may affect the histopathological results. Key Words: Abnormal uterine bleeding, Probe curettage, Karman cannula, Histopathological evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信