在成人重症监护病房实施重症疼痛观察工具的影响:非随机阶梯试验。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Majid A Alotni, Jenny Sim, Ginger Chu, Michelle Guilhermino, Daniel Barker, Stuart Szwec, Ritin Fernandez
{"title":"在成人重症监护病房实施重症疼痛观察工具的影响:非随机阶梯试验。","authors":"Majid A Alotni, Jenny Sim, Ginger Chu, Michelle Guilhermino, Daniel Barker, Stuart Szwec, Ritin Fernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 70% of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) experience untreated pain, often due to severe patient conditions and communication barriers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to implement the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) to improve pain assessment in patients unable to self-report pain in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A stepped-wedge trial was conducted in six adult ICUs in Saudi Arabia between February and June 2022. The sequential transition of ICU clusters occurred in February 2022, from control to intervention, until all ICUs were exposed to the intervention. The primary outcome was the number of pain assessments, whereas the secondary outcomes were reassessments. Other outcomes were length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and administered doses of sedatives and analgesic agents. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis Software v9.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 725 patients unable to self-report pain were included; 65% (n = 469) were male with an average age of 55 years. Implementing CPOT showed a significant increase in the number of pain assessments (rate ratio: 1.77, 95% confidence interval: 1.45, 2.16, p < 0.001) and reassessments (rate ratio: 13.99, 95% confidence interval: 8.14, 24.02, p < 0.001) between intervention and control conditions. There was no significant effect on the ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and the amount of sedation (midazolam, propofol, and ketamine) and analgesia (fentanyl) administered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicates that the implementation of the CPOT increased the frequency of pain assessment and reassessment. However, the impact on patient outcomes remains inconclusive. Further investigations focussing on CPOT as the primary pain scale are necessary to determine its holistic impact on patient outcomes over the long term.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05488834.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>This study was registered with the U.S. National Library of Medicine (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT05488834).</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"101129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of implementing the critical-care pain observation tool in the adult intensive care unit: A nonrandomised stepped-wedge trial.\",\"authors\":\"Majid A Alotni, Jenny Sim, Ginger Chu, Michelle Guilhermino, Daniel Barker, Stuart Szwec, Ritin Fernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 70% of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) experience untreated pain, often due to severe patient conditions and communication barriers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to implement the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) to improve pain assessment in patients unable to self-report pain in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A stepped-wedge trial was conducted in six adult ICUs in Saudi Arabia between February and June 2022. The sequential transition of ICU clusters occurred in February 2022, from control to intervention, until all ICUs were exposed to the intervention. The primary outcome was the number of pain assessments, whereas the secondary outcomes were reassessments. Other outcomes were length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and administered doses of sedatives and analgesic agents. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis Software v9.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 725 patients unable to self-report pain were included; 65% (n = 469) were male with an average age of 55 years. Implementing CPOT showed a significant increase in the number of pain assessments (rate ratio: 1.77, 95% confidence interval: 1.45, 2.16, p < 0.001) and reassessments (rate ratio: 13.99, 95% confidence interval: 8.14, 24.02, p < 0.001) between intervention and control conditions. There was no significant effect on the ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and the amount of sedation (midazolam, propofol, and ketamine) and analgesia (fentanyl) administered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicates that the implementation of the CPOT increased the frequency of pain assessment and reassessment. However, the impact on patient outcomes remains inconclusive. Further investigations focussing on CPOT as the primary pain scale are necessary to determine its holistic impact on patient outcomes over the long term.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05488834.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>This study was registered with the U.S. National Library of Medicine (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT05488834).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在重症监护病房(ICU)中,约有 70% 的患者经历过未经治疗的疼痛:目的:本研究旨在实施重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT),以改善重症监护病房中无法自我报告疼痛的患者的疼痛评估:方法:2022 年 2 月至 6 月期间,在沙特阿拉伯的 6 个成人重症监护病房进行了阶梯式试验。2022 年 2 月,重症监护室分组从对照组依次过渡到干预组,直到所有重症监护室都接受干预。主要结果是疼痛评估次数,次要结果是重新评估次数。其他结果包括住院时间、机械通气持续时间以及镇静剂和镇痛剂的使用剂量。统计分析使用统计分析软件 v9.4 进行:共纳入 725 名无法自我报告疼痛的患者;65%(n = 469)为男性,平均年龄 55 岁。实施 CPOT 后,疼痛评估次数明显增加(比率比:1.77,95% 置信区间:1.45, 2.16,P 结论:CPOT 是一种有效的疼痛评估方法:研究表明,CPOT 的实施增加了疼痛评估和重新评估的频率。然而,其对患者预后的影响仍无定论。有必要对 CPOT 作为主要疼痛量表进行进一步调查,以确定其对患者预后的长期整体影响:NCT05488834.Clinical trial registration number:本研究已在美国国家医学图书馆注册(ClinicalTrial.gov,NCT05488834)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of implementing the critical-care pain observation tool in the adult intensive care unit: A nonrandomised stepped-wedge trial.

Background: Approximately 70% of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) experience untreated pain, often due to severe patient conditions and communication barriers.

Aim: The aim of this study was to implement the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) to improve pain assessment in patients unable to self-report pain in the ICU.

Method: A stepped-wedge trial was conducted in six adult ICUs in Saudi Arabia between February and June 2022. The sequential transition of ICU clusters occurred in February 2022, from control to intervention, until all ICUs were exposed to the intervention. The primary outcome was the number of pain assessments, whereas the secondary outcomes were reassessments. Other outcomes were length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and administered doses of sedatives and analgesic agents. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis Software v9.4.

Results: A total of 725 patients unable to self-report pain were included; 65% (n = 469) were male with an average age of 55 years. Implementing CPOT showed a significant increase in the number of pain assessments (rate ratio: 1.77, 95% confidence interval: 1.45, 2.16, p < 0.001) and reassessments (rate ratio: 13.99, 95% confidence interval: 8.14, 24.02, p < 0.001) between intervention and control conditions. There was no significant effect on the ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and the amount of sedation (midazolam, propofol, and ketamine) and analgesia (fentanyl) administered.

Conclusion: The study indicates that the implementation of the CPOT increased the frequency of pain assessment and reassessment. However, the impact on patient outcomes remains inconclusive. Further investigations focussing on CPOT as the primary pain scale are necessary to determine its holistic impact on patient outcomes over the long term.

Trial registration: NCT05488834.

Clinical trial registration number: This study was registered with the U.S. National Library of Medicine (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT05488834).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信