超越全身炎症反应综合征和菌血症:现代重症监护计算器是否有助于预测假体周围关节感染的清创、抗生素和植入物滞留治疗结果?

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Mia J Fowler, Elshaday S Belay, Andrew Hughes, Yu-Fen Chiu, Daniel K Devine, Alberto V Carli
{"title":"超越全身炎症反应综合征和菌血症:现代重症监护计算器是否有助于预测假体周围关节感染的清创、抗生素和植入物滞留治疗结果?","authors":"Mia J Fowler, Elshaday S Belay, Andrew Hughes, Yu-Fen Chiu, Daniel K Devine, Alberto V Carli","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In critically ill periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) patients, surgeons need to balance the need for aggressive, definitive treatment against the health state of a potentially unstable patient. A clear understanding of the association between treatment outcomes and assessment scores for sepsis would benefit clinical decision-making in these urgent cases. The current study evaluates the effect of critical illness on debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) outcomes, as defined by systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and, for the first time, by contemporary markers quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified 253 patients who underwent DAIR for PJI at a single institution between 2017 and 2021. The SIRS, qSOFA, and MEWS scores were calculated based on variables on admission. A DAIR treatment failure, defined as reoperation or mortality, was measured at 90 days and two years. Univariate analysis was used to determine the association between elevated critical care scores and DAIR failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DAIR treatment success was 59% at two years, with hip procedures and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 1 independently associated with higher odds of DAIR failure. There were 43 patients (16%) who presented with SIRS, however, only four (2%) had positive qSOFA scores. Neither SIRS nor qSOFA were predictive of DAIR failure. For knees only, elevated MEWS scores were predictive of 90-day DAIR failure (P = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over one in six patients undergoing DAIR for PJI presented with SIRS, while only one in 50 had a positive qSOFA. The SIRS and qSOFA scores were not predictive of DAIR failure. Elevated MEWS scores were associated with DAIR failure at 90 days postoperatively in knee PJIs only, and should be confirmed in a larger cohort. Our results suggest that SIRS is not predictive of DAIR outcomes, possibly because it overestimates the proportion of critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving Beyond Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Bacteremia: Are Modern Critical Care Calculators Useful in Predicting Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Treatment Outcomes in Periprosthetic Joint Infection?\",\"authors\":\"Mia J Fowler, Elshaday S Belay, Andrew Hughes, Yu-Fen Chiu, Daniel K Devine, Alberto V Carli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In critically ill periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) patients, surgeons need to balance the need for aggressive, definitive treatment against the health state of a potentially unstable patient. A clear understanding of the association between treatment outcomes and assessment scores for sepsis would benefit clinical decision-making in these urgent cases. The current study evaluates the effect of critical illness on debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) outcomes, as defined by systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and, for the first time, by contemporary markers quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified 253 patients who underwent DAIR for PJI at a single institution between 2017 and 2021. The SIRS, qSOFA, and MEWS scores were calculated based on variables on admission. A DAIR treatment failure, defined as reoperation or mortality, was measured at 90 days and two years. Univariate analysis was used to determine the association between elevated critical care scores and DAIR failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DAIR treatment success was 59% at two years, with hip procedures and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 1 independently associated with higher odds of DAIR failure. There were 43 patients (16%) who presented with SIRS, however, only four (2%) had positive qSOFA scores. Neither SIRS nor qSOFA were predictive of DAIR failure. For knees only, elevated MEWS scores were predictive of 90-day DAIR failure (P = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over one in six patients undergoing DAIR for PJI presented with SIRS, while only one in 50 had a positive qSOFA. The SIRS and qSOFA scores were not predictive of DAIR failure. Elevated MEWS scores were associated with DAIR failure at 90 days postoperatively in knee PJIs only, and should be confirmed in a larger cohort. Our results suggest that SIRS is not predictive of DAIR outcomes, possibly because it overestimates the proportion of critically ill patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.127\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在重症假体周围关节感染(PJI)患者中,外科医生需要在积极、明确的治疗需求与潜在不稳定患者的健康状况之间取得平衡。清楚地了解治疗结果与败血症评估评分之间的关系将有利于这些紧急病例的临床决策。目前的研究评估了危重病对清创、抗生素和植入物保留(DAIR)结果的影响,这些结果由全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)以及首次由当代指标快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)和改良早期预警评分(MEWS)定义:我们回顾性地确定了 2017 年至 2021 年间在一家机构接受 DAIR 治疗的 253 例 PJI 患者。根据入院时的变量计算出 SIRS、qSOFA 和 MEWS 评分。DAIR治疗失败(定义为再次手术或死亡)在90天和两年时进行测量。单变量分析用于确定危重症评分升高与 DAIR 治疗失败之间的关联:结果:两年后的DAIR治疗成功率为59%,臀部手术和Charlson合并症指数(CCI)≥1与较高的DAIR失败几率独立相关。有 43 名患者(16%)出现 SIRS,但只有 4 名患者(2%)的 qSOFA 评分呈阳性。SIRS和qSOFA都不能预测DAIR失败。仅就膝关节而言,MEWS评分升高可预测90天DAIR失败(P = 0.019):结论:每六名接受 DAIR 的 PJI 患者中就有一人出现 SIRS,而每 50 名患者中只有一人的 qSOFA 呈阳性。SIRS和qSOFA评分不能预测DAIR失败。MEWS 评分升高仅与膝关节 PJI 术后 90 天 DAIR 失败有关,应在更大的队列中加以证实。我们的结果表明,SIRS 无法预测 DAIR 的结果,这可能是因为它高估了重症患者的比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moving Beyond Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Bacteremia: Are Modern Critical Care Calculators Useful in Predicting Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Treatment Outcomes in Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

Background: In critically ill periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) patients, surgeons need to balance the need for aggressive, definitive treatment against the health state of a potentially unstable patient. A clear understanding of the association between treatment outcomes and assessment scores for sepsis would benefit clinical decision-making in these urgent cases. The current study evaluates the effect of critical illness on debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) outcomes, as defined by systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and, for the first time, by contemporary markers quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS).

Methods: We retrospectively identified 253 patients who underwent DAIR for PJI at a single institution between 2017 and 2021. The SIRS, qSOFA, and MEWS scores were calculated based on variables on admission. A DAIR treatment failure, defined as reoperation or mortality, was measured at 90 days and two years. Univariate analysis was used to determine the association between elevated critical care scores and DAIR failure.

Results: The DAIR treatment success was 59% at two years, with hip procedures and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 1 independently associated with higher odds of DAIR failure. There were 43 patients (16%) who presented with SIRS, however, only four (2%) had positive qSOFA scores. Neither SIRS nor qSOFA were predictive of DAIR failure. For knees only, elevated MEWS scores were predictive of 90-day DAIR failure (P = 0.019).

Conclusion: Over one in six patients undergoing DAIR for PJI presented with SIRS, while only one in 50 had a positive qSOFA. The SIRS and qSOFA scores were not predictive of DAIR failure. Elevated MEWS scores were associated with DAIR failure at 90 days postoperatively in knee PJIs only, and should be confirmed in a larger cohort. Our results suggest that SIRS is not predictive of DAIR outcomes, possibly because it overestimates the proportion of critically ill patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信