停用和重新使用脊髓刺激恢复咳嗽的效果。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anthony F DiMarco, Robert T Geertman, Chong Kim, Gregory A Nemunaitis, Krzysztof E Kowalski
{"title":"停用和重新使用脊髓刺激恢复咳嗽的效果。","authors":"Anthony F DiMarco, Robert T Geertman, Chong Kim, Gregory A Nemunaitis, Krzysztof E Kowalski","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2395082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Paralysis of the expiratory muscles in cervical and high thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI) results in an impaired ability to clear airway secretions effectively and increases the risk of atelectasis and respiratory tract infections (RTI). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) applied via the Cough Stimulation System (CSS) has been shown to restore an effective cough mechanism in subjects with SCI. In this study, we evaluated the specific impact of use of the CSS by one study participant with SCI, subsequent discontinuation of usage, and then re-institution of this modality. Airway pressure generation (P) and peak expiratory airflow rate (F) achieved with CSS and clinical assessment questionnaires were assessed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>With the CSS, this subject was able to generate P and F rates of 103 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and 7.1 l/s, respectively, with associated significant clinical benefits, including, much greater ease in raising secretions and reduction in the incidence of RTIs. However, following a 2-year period of regular use, the CSS became non-functional and a 2-year period elapsed before it could be replaced. During this time, he again experienced great difficulty managing airway secretions and an increased frequency of RTIs. Re-institution of the CSS system resulted in the restoration of an effective cough mechanism and similar clinical benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/clinical relevance: </strong>This report demonstrates the very high degree of the clinical utility of the CSS as it had made a substantial beneficial impact on this participant's respiratory status and life quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of withdrawal and re-application of spinal cord stimulation to restore cough.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony F DiMarco, Robert T Geertman, Chong Kim, Gregory A Nemunaitis, Krzysztof E Kowalski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2024.2395082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Paralysis of the expiratory muscles in cervical and high thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI) results in an impaired ability to clear airway secretions effectively and increases the risk of atelectasis and respiratory tract infections (RTI). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) applied via the Cough Stimulation System (CSS) has been shown to restore an effective cough mechanism in subjects with SCI. In this study, we evaluated the specific impact of use of the CSS by one study participant with SCI, subsequent discontinuation of usage, and then re-institution of this modality. Airway pressure generation (P) and peak expiratory airflow rate (F) achieved with CSS and clinical assessment questionnaires were assessed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>With the CSS, this subject was able to generate P and F rates of 103 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and 7.1 l/s, respectively, with associated significant clinical benefits, including, much greater ease in raising secretions and reduction in the incidence of RTIs. However, following a 2-year period of regular use, the CSS became non-functional and a 2-year period elapsed before it could be replaced. During this time, he again experienced great difficulty managing airway secretions and an increased frequency of RTIs. Re-institution of the CSS system resulted in the restoration of an effective cough mechanism and similar clinical benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/clinical relevance: </strong>This report demonstrates the very high degree of the clinical utility of the CSS as it had made a substantial beneficial impact on this participant's respiratory status and life quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2395082\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2395082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颈椎和高胸椎脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的呼气肌肉瘫痪会导致有效清除气道分泌物的能力受损,并增加发生肺不张和呼吸道感染(RTI)的风险。通过咳嗽刺激系统(CSS)进行脊髓刺激(SCS)已被证明可以恢复 SCI 患者的有效咳嗽机制。在这项研究中,我们评估了一名 SCI 患者使用脊髓刺激系统、随后停止使用以及重新使用这种方式的具体影响。我们评估了使用 CSS 和临床评估问卷所产生的气道压力(P)和呼气峰值气流率(F):使用 CSS 后,该受试者的气道压力和呼气峰值气流率分别达到了 103 cmH2O 和 7.1 l/s,并获得了显著的临床疗效,包括更容易排出分泌物和减少 RTI 的发生。然而,经过两年的正常使用后,CSS 开始失灵,两年后才得以更换。在此期间,他再次遇到了处理气道分泌物的巨大困难,而且 RTI 的发生频率也有所增加。重新安装 CSS 系统后,他恢复了有效的咳嗽机制,并获得了类似的临床疗效:本报告证明了 CSS 系统的高度临床实用性,因为它对该受试者的呼吸状况和生活质量产生了实质性的有益影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of withdrawal and re-application of spinal cord stimulation to restore cough.

Context: Paralysis of the expiratory muscles in cervical and high thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI) results in an impaired ability to clear airway secretions effectively and increases the risk of atelectasis and respiratory tract infections (RTI). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) applied via the Cough Stimulation System (CSS) has been shown to restore an effective cough mechanism in subjects with SCI. In this study, we evaluated the specific impact of use of the CSS by one study participant with SCI, subsequent discontinuation of usage, and then re-institution of this modality. Airway pressure generation (P) and peak expiratory airflow rate (F) achieved with CSS and clinical assessment questionnaires were assessed.

Findings: With the CSS, this subject was able to generate P and F rates of 103 cmH2O and 7.1 l/s, respectively, with associated significant clinical benefits, including, much greater ease in raising secretions and reduction in the incidence of RTIs. However, following a 2-year period of regular use, the CSS became non-functional and a 2-year period elapsed before it could be replaced. During this time, he again experienced great difficulty managing airway secretions and an increased frequency of RTIs. Re-institution of the CSS system resulted in the restoration of an effective cough mechanism and similar clinical benefits.

Conclusion/clinical relevance: This report demonstrates the very high degree of the clinical utility of the CSS as it had made a substantial beneficial impact on this participant's respiratory status and life quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信