Rebecca E. Ranson , Peter Scarfe , Loes C.J. van Dam , Paul B. Hibbard
{"title":"深度恒定和绝对辐辏异常。","authors":"Rebecca E. Ranson , Peter Scarfe , Loes C.J. van Dam , Paul B. Hibbard","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Binocular disparity provides information about the depth structure of objects and surfaces in our environment. Since disparity depends on the distance to objects as well as the depth separation of points, information about distance is required to estimate depth from disparity. Our perception of size and shape is biased, such that far objects appear too small and flattened in depth, and near objects too big and stretched in depth. The current study assessed the extent to which the failure of depth constancy can be accounted for by the uncertainty of distance information provided by vergence. We measured individual differences in vergence noise using a nonius line task, and the degree of depth constancy using a task in which observers judged the magnitude of a depth interval relative to the vertical distance between two targets in the image plane. We found no correlation between the two measures, and show that depth constancy was much poorer than would be expected from vergence noise measured in this way. This limited ability to take account of vergence in the perception of depth is, however, consistent with our poor sensitivity to absolute disparity differences. This absolute disparity anomaly thus also applies to our poor ability to make use of vergence information for absolute distance judgements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 108501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depth constancy and the absolute vergence anomaly\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca E. Ranson , Peter Scarfe , Loes C.J. van Dam , Paul B. Hibbard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Binocular disparity provides information about the depth structure of objects and surfaces in our environment. Since disparity depends on the distance to objects as well as the depth separation of points, information about distance is required to estimate depth from disparity. Our perception of size and shape is biased, such that far objects appear too small and flattened in depth, and near objects too big and stretched in depth. The current study assessed the extent to which the failure of depth constancy can be accounted for by the uncertainty of distance information provided by vergence. We measured individual differences in vergence noise using a nonius line task, and the degree of depth constancy using a task in which observers judged the magnitude of a depth interval relative to the vertical distance between two targets in the image plane. We found no correlation between the two measures, and show that depth constancy was much poorer than would be expected from vergence noise measured in this way. This limited ability to take account of vergence in the perception of depth is, however, consistent with our poor sensitivity to absolute disparity differences. This absolute disparity anomaly thus also applies to our poor ability to make use of vergence information for absolute distance judgements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001457\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Binocular disparity provides information about the depth structure of objects and surfaces in our environment. Since disparity depends on the distance to objects as well as the depth separation of points, information about distance is required to estimate depth from disparity. Our perception of size and shape is biased, such that far objects appear too small and flattened in depth, and near objects too big and stretched in depth. The current study assessed the extent to which the failure of depth constancy can be accounted for by the uncertainty of distance information provided by vergence. We measured individual differences in vergence noise using a nonius line task, and the degree of depth constancy using a task in which observers judged the magnitude of a depth interval relative to the vertical distance between two targets in the image plane. We found no correlation between the two measures, and show that depth constancy was much poorer than would be expected from vergence noise measured in this way. This limited ability to take account of vergence in the perception of depth is, however, consistent with our poor sensitivity to absolute disparity differences. This absolute disparity anomaly thus also applies to our poor ability to make use of vergence information for absolute distance judgements.
期刊介绍:
Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.