低度退行性脊柱滑脱症和脊柱狭窄症患者的减压而非融合术:患者报告的长期疗效。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Judith M P van Grafhorst, Wilco C Peul, Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
{"title":"低度退行性脊柱滑脱症和脊柱狭窄症患者的减压而非融合术:患者报告的长期疗效。","authors":"Judith M P van Grafhorst, Wilco C Peul, Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One-third of patients suffering from neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis have low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. Decompression in these patients is considered a risk factor for instability, and it remains unclear whether instrumented fusion should be added. This study aims to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of decompressive surgery without instrumented fusion in symptomatic spinal stenosis patients regardless of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, lumbar spinal stenosis patients with or without spondylolisthesis undergoing decompressive surgery were studied, 9 years postoperatively. Pain, functionality, and satisfaction questionnaires were sent to 250 spondylolisthesis and 200 randomly selected stenosis patients. Demographic characteristics, surgical technique, reoperation indication and incidence, and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At long-term follow-up, the mean Oswestry Disability Index was 23.6 ±20.15 in the spondylolisthesis group and 23.4 ±20.9 (p=0.957) in the stenosis group. The EuroQol-5D was 0.74±0.28 and 0.75 ±0.24 (p=0.793) respectively. The Zurich Claudication Questionnaire score was 48.2% ±18.8 and 49.6% ±18.5 (p=0.646) respectively. After nine years of follow-up, comparable satisfaction rates are reported (69% of spondylolisthesis patients and 68% of stenosis patients (p=0.855). Reoperation rates were comparable in the spondylolisthesis and stenosis group (7 versus 6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This cohort study demonstrated comparable satisfaction and clinical outcomes after decompressive surgery for symptomatic spinal stenosis in patients with and without grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis. Decompressive surgery can, therefore, be considered an effective treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis, even if it is accompanied by degenerative spondylolisthesis. Therefore, routinely adding instrumented spondylodesis is not deemed necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decompression without fusion in low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis patients: long-term patient-reported outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Judith M P van Grafhorst, Wilco C Peul, Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One-third of patients suffering from neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis have low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. Decompression in these patients is considered a risk factor for instability, and it remains unclear whether instrumented fusion should be added. This study aims to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of decompressive surgery without instrumented fusion in symptomatic spinal stenosis patients regardless of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, lumbar spinal stenosis patients with or without spondylolisthesis undergoing decompressive surgery were studied, 9 years postoperatively. Pain, functionality, and satisfaction questionnaires were sent to 250 spondylolisthesis and 200 randomly selected stenosis patients. Demographic characteristics, surgical technique, reoperation indication and incidence, and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At long-term follow-up, the mean Oswestry Disability Index was 23.6 ±20.15 in the spondylolisthesis group and 23.4 ±20.9 (p=0.957) in the stenosis group. The EuroQol-5D was 0.74±0.28 and 0.75 ±0.24 (p=0.793) respectively. The Zurich Claudication Questionnaire score was 48.2% ±18.8 and 49.6% ±18.5 (p=0.646) respectively. After nine years of follow-up, comparable satisfaction rates are reported (69% of spondylolisthesis patients and 68% of stenosis patients (p=0.855). Reoperation rates were comparable in the spondylolisthesis and stenosis group (7 versus 6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This cohort study demonstrated comparable satisfaction and clinical outcomes after decompressive surgery for symptomatic spinal stenosis in patients with and without grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis. Decompressive surgery can, therefore, be considered an effective treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis, even if it is accompanied by degenerative spondylolisthesis. Therefore, routinely adding instrumented spondylodesis is not deemed necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.123\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:三分之一因腰椎管狭窄而出现神经源性跛行的患者患有低度退行性脊椎滑脱症。对这些患者进行减压手术被认为是导致不稳定的危险因素,目前仍不清楚是否应增加器械融合术。本研究旨在评估无症状椎管狭窄症患者(无论是否存在低度退行性椎体滑脱)在不进行器械融合的情况下进行减压手术的长期临床疗效:在这项回顾性队列研究中,研究对象是接受减压手术的腰椎管狭窄症患者,无论是否患有脊柱滑脱症。对 250 名椎体滑脱症患者和随机抽取的 200 名椎管狭窄症患者进行了疼痛、功能和满意度问卷调查。对人口统计学特征、手术技术、再手术指征和发生率以及患者报告的结果进行了评估:在长期随访中,椎体滑脱症组的平均 Oswestry 失能指数为 23.6 ± 20.15,椎管狭窄组为 23.4 ± 20.9(P=0.957)。EuroQol-5D分别为0.74±0.28和0.75±0.24(P=0.793)。苏黎世跛行问卷得分分别为(48.2%±18.8)和(49.6%±18.5)(P=0.646)。经过九年的随访,满意率相当(69%的脊柱滑脱症患者和68%的狭窄症患者(P=0.855)。椎体滑脱症组和椎管狭窄症组的再手术率相当(7% 对 6%):这项队列研究表明,对患有和未患有1级退行性脊椎滑脱症的症状性椎管狭窄患者进行减压手术后,其满意度和临床疗效相当。因此,即使伴有退行性椎体骨质疏松,减压手术也可被视为治疗症状性腰椎管狭窄症的有效方法。因此,常规添加器械性脊椎矫正术被认为是不必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decompression without fusion in low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis patients: long-term patient-reported outcome.

Background: One-third of patients suffering from neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis have low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. Decompression in these patients is considered a risk factor for instability, and it remains unclear whether instrumented fusion should be added. This study aims to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of decompressive surgery without instrumented fusion in symptomatic spinal stenosis patients regardless of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, lumbar spinal stenosis patients with or without spondylolisthesis undergoing decompressive surgery were studied, 9 years postoperatively. Pain, functionality, and satisfaction questionnaires were sent to 250 spondylolisthesis and 200 randomly selected stenosis patients. Demographic characteristics, surgical technique, reoperation indication and incidence, and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed.

Results: At long-term follow-up, the mean Oswestry Disability Index was 23.6 ±20.15 in the spondylolisthesis group and 23.4 ±20.9 (p=0.957) in the stenosis group. The EuroQol-5D was 0.74±0.28 and 0.75 ±0.24 (p=0.793) respectively. The Zurich Claudication Questionnaire score was 48.2% ±18.8 and 49.6% ±18.5 (p=0.646) respectively. After nine years of follow-up, comparable satisfaction rates are reported (69% of spondylolisthesis patients and 68% of stenosis patients (p=0.855). Reoperation rates were comparable in the spondylolisthesis and stenosis group (7 versus 6%).

Conclusion: This cohort study demonstrated comparable satisfaction and clinical outcomes after decompressive surgery for symptomatic spinal stenosis in patients with and without grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis. Decompressive surgery can, therefore, be considered an effective treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis, even if it is accompanied by degenerative spondylolisthesis. Therefore, routinely adding instrumented spondylodesis is not deemed necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信