对估算卧推和腿部伸展运动从重复到失败的最大重复次数的公式进行交叉验证。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Trevor D Roberts, Robert W Smith, Jocelyn E Arnett, Dolores G Ortega, Richard J Schmidt, Terry J Housh
{"title":"对估算卧推和腿部伸展运动从重复到失败的最大重复次数的公式进行交叉验证。","authors":"Trevor D Roberts, Robert W Smith, Jocelyn E Arnett, Dolores G Ortega, Richard J Schmidt, Terry J Housh","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Roberts, TD, Smith, RW, Arnett, JE, Ortega, DG, Schmidt, RJ, and Housh, TJ. Cross-validation of equations for estimating 1 repetition maximum from repetitions to failure for the bench press and leg extension. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Eighteen previously published equations (EQs) that estimate 1 repetition maximum (1RM) from repetitions to failure (RTF) were cross-validated for the bench press (BP) and leg extension (LE) movements. Forty-three recreationally active men (age: 20.58 ± 1.47 years; body mass [BM]: 81.66 ± 13.65 kg) completed a 1RM test and RTF at 80% of the 1RM test for the LE, and 39 of the 43 men (age: 20.61 ± 1.48 years; BM: 83.58 ± 12.73 kg) completed the same tests for the BP. The EQs were categorized as generic (the source did not indicate its applicability for a specific movement) or movement-specific (BP-specific and LE-specific EQs). The generic EQs were cross-validated for both movements, whereas the BP-specific and LE-specific EQs were cross-validated for their respective movements only. The cross-validation criteria included calculations of the constant error (CE) (mean differences between estimated and measured 1RM), Pearson Correlation Coefficient, standard error of the estimate, and total error. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. After the initial cross-validation analyses of the previously published EQs, the most accurate EQs were modified by subtracting their cross-validation CE from the original EQ to improve their accuracy for estimating BP and LE 1RM by eliminating systematic error. The modified EQs were then cross-validated using the same statistical procedures. Based on the cross-validation analyses, we recommend the following EQs: BP 1RM = (RTF0.1 × weight) + 1.49 and LE 1RM = (RTF0.1 × weight) + 1.06 using weights that result in 4-10 RTF.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Validation of Equations for Estimating 1 Repetition Maximum From Repetitions to Failure for the Bench Press and Leg Extension.\",\"authors\":\"Trevor D Roberts, Robert W Smith, Jocelyn E Arnett, Dolores G Ortega, Richard J Schmidt, Terry J Housh\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Roberts, TD, Smith, RW, Arnett, JE, Ortega, DG, Schmidt, RJ, and Housh, TJ. Cross-validation of equations for estimating 1 repetition maximum from repetitions to failure for the bench press and leg extension. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Eighteen previously published equations (EQs) that estimate 1 repetition maximum (1RM) from repetitions to failure (RTF) were cross-validated for the bench press (BP) and leg extension (LE) movements. Forty-three recreationally active men (age: 20.58 ± 1.47 years; body mass [BM]: 81.66 ± 13.65 kg) completed a 1RM test and RTF at 80% of the 1RM test for the LE, and 39 of the 43 men (age: 20.61 ± 1.48 years; BM: 83.58 ± 12.73 kg) completed the same tests for the BP. The EQs were categorized as generic (the source did not indicate its applicability for a specific movement) or movement-specific (BP-specific and LE-specific EQs). The generic EQs were cross-validated for both movements, whereas the BP-specific and LE-specific EQs were cross-validated for their respective movements only. The cross-validation criteria included calculations of the constant error (CE) (mean differences between estimated and measured 1RM), Pearson Correlation Coefficient, standard error of the estimate, and total error. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. After the initial cross-validation analyses of the previously published EQs, the most accurate EQs were modified by subtracting their cross-validation CE from the original EQ to improve their accuracy for estimating BP and LE 1RM by eliminating systematic error. The modified EQs were then cross-validated using the same statistical procedures. Based on the cross-validation analyses, we recommend the following EQs: BP 1RM = (RTF0.1 × weight) + 1.49 and LE 1RM = (RTF0.1 × weight) + 1.06 using weights that result in 4-10 RTF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004987\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004987","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要: Roberts、TD、Smith、RW、Arnett、JE、Ortega、DG、Schmidt、RJ 和 Housh、TJ。从卧推和伸腿的重复次数到失败次数中估算最大重复次数的交叉验证公式。J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024-针对卧推(BP)和腿部伸展(LE)动作,对之前发表的 18 个估算从重复到失败(RTF)的最大重复次数(1RM)的方程(EQs)进行了交叉验证。43名从事娱乐活动的男性(年龄:20.58 ± 1.47岁;体重[BM]:81.66 ± 13.65千克)完成了LE的1RM测试和80%的RTF测试,43名男性中的39名(年龄:20.61 ± 1.48岁;体重:83.58 ± 12.73千克)完成了BP的相同测试。EQs 被分为通用 EQs(来源未说明其对特定动作的适用性)和特定动作 EQs(BP 特定 EQs 和 LE 特定 EQs)。通用 EQ 针对两个动作进行交叉验证,而 BP 专项和 LE 专项 EQ 仅针对各自的动作进行交叉验证。交叉验证标准包括计算恒定误差 (CE)(估计值和测量值 1RM 之间的平均差)、皮尔逊相关系数、估计值标准误差和总误差。显著性水平设定为 p≤ 0.05。在对之前公布的 EQ 进行初步交叉验证分析后,通过从原始 EQ 中减去交叉验证 CE,对最准确的 EQ 进行修改,以消除系统误差,提高其估算血压和 LE 1RM 的准确性。然后使用相同的统计程序对修改后的 EQ 进行交叉验证。根据交叉验证分析,我们推荐使用以下 EQ:BP 1RM = (RTF0.1 × 重量) + 1.49,LE 1RM = (RTF0.1 × 重量) + 1.06,使用的权重为 4-10 RTF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Validation of Equations for Estimating 1 Repetition Maximum From Repetitions to Failure for the Bench Press and Leg Extension.

Abstract: Roberts, TD, Smith, RW, Arnett, JE, Ortega, DG, Schmidt, RJ, and Housh, TJ. Cross-validation of equations for estimating 1 repetition maximum from repetitions to failure for the bench press and leg extension. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Eighteen previously published equations (EQs) that estimate 1 repetition maximum (1RM) from repetitions to failure (RTF) were cross-validated for the bench press (BP) and leg extension (LE) movements. Forty-three recreationally active men (age: 20.58 ± 1.47 years; body mass [BM]: 81.66 ± 13.65 kg) completed a 1RM test and RTF at 80% of the 1RM test for the LE, and 39 of the 43 men (age: 20.61 ± 1.48 years; BM: 83.58 ± 12.73 kg) completed the same tests for the BP. The EQs were categorized as generic (the source did not indicate its applicability for a specific movement) or movement-specific (BP-specific and LE-specific EQs). The generic EQs were cross-validated for both movements, whereas the BP-specific and LE-specific EQs were cross-validated for their respective movements only. The cross-validation criteria included calculations of the constant error (CE) (mean differences between estimated and measured 1RM), Pearson Correlation Coefficient, standard error of the estimate, and total error. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. After the initial cross-validation analyses of the previously published EQs, the most accurate EQs were modified by subtracting their cross-validation CE from the original EQ to improve their accuracy for estimating BP and LE 1RM by eliminating systematic error. The modified EQs were then cross-validated using the same statistical procedures. Based on the cross-validation analyses, we recommend the following EQs: BP 1RM = (RTF0.1 × weight) + 1.49 and LE 1RM = (RTF0.1 × weight) + 1.06 using weights that result in 4-10 RTF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信