Samuel C. Watson , Alison C. Neujahr , Byron D. Chaves , Samodha C. Fernando , Gary A. Sullivan
{"title":"通过对内布拉斯加州即食肉类加工企业进行环境监测,分离出了李斯特菌和对季氨消毒剂高度耐药的假单胞菌。","authors":"Samuel C. Watson , Alison C. Neujahr , Byron D. Chaves , Samodha C. Fernando , Gary A. Sullivan","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Robust environmental monitoring for <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em> often may not be feasible for small and very small meat processors in the United States due to the limitations in finances, staffing, or expertise. Three small/very small processors in Nebraska were sampled using sponge applicators in nonfood contact surface areas to determine if biofilm and sanitizer resistance behaviors of <em>Pseudomonas</em> could relate to the prevalence of <em>L. monocytogenes</em> and <em>Listeria</em> spp. in ready-to-eat meat processing environments. Samples were 3.3% (3/90) positive for <em>L. monocytogenes,</em> and 12.2% (11/90) of samples were positive for <em>Listeria</em> spp. <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. were also isolated. When <em>Listeria</em> spp. and <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. were assayed for biofilm production and resistance to a quaternary ammonia sanitizer, multiple isolates belonging to both genera capable of forming biofilms were identified. Four <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. isolates resisted the 200 ppm manufacturer-recommended sanitizer concentration for food contact surface sanitation, and one <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. isolated from a drain sample that was also positive for <em>L. monocytogenes</em> demonstrated a sanitizer minimum bactericidal concentration of 1000 ppm. These findings further support the need for monitoring of small and very small meat processors for <em>L. monocytogenes</em> as well as highlight the need to identify other bacteria in these processing environments, like <em>Pseudomonas,</em> that are resistant to environmental stressors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"87 12","pages":"Article 100391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Monitoring of Nebraska Ready-to-eat Meat Processing Establishments Resulted in the Isolation of Listeria Alongside Pseudomonas Highly Resistant to Quaternary Ammonia Sanitizer\",\"authors\":\"Samuel C. Watson , Alison C. Neujahr , Byron D. Chaves , Samodha C. Fernando , Gary A. Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Robust environmental monitoring for <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em> often may not be feasible for small and very small meat processors in the United States due to the limitations in finances, staffing, or expertise. Three small/very small processors in Nebraska were sampled using sponge applicators in nonfood contact surface areas to determine if biofilm and sanitizer resistance behaviors of <em>Pseudomonas</em> could relate to the prevalence of <em>L. monocytogenes</em> and <em>Listeria</em> spp. in ready-to-eat meat processing environments. Samples were 3.3% (3/90) positive for <em>L. monocytogenes,</em> and 12.2% (11/90) of samples were positive for <em>Listeria</em> spp. <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. were also isolated. When <em>Listeria</em> spp. and <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. were assayed for biofilm production and resistance to a quaternary ammonia sanitizer, multiple isolates belonging to both genera capable of forming biofilms were identified. Four <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. isolates resisted the 200 ppm manufacturer-recommended sanitizer concentration for food contact surface sanitation, and one <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. isolated from a drain sample that was also positive for <em>L. monocytogenes</em> demonstrated a sanitizer minimum bactericidal concentration of 1000 ppm. These findings further support the need for monitoring of small and very small meat processors for <em>L. monocytogenes</em> as well as highlight the need to identify other bacteria in these processing environments, like <em>Pseudomonas,</em> that are resistant to environmental stressors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"87 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 100391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001753\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Environmental Monitoring of Nebraska Ready-to-eat Meat Processing Establishments Resulted in the Isolation of Listeria Alongside Pseudomonas Highly Resistant to Quaternary Ammonia Sanitizer
Robust environmental monitoring for Listeria monocytogenes often may not be feasible for small and very small meat processors in the United States due to the limitations in finances, staffing, or expertise. Three small/very small processors in Nebraska were sampled using sponge applicators in nonfood contact surface areas to determine if biofilm and sanitizer resistance behaviors of Pseudomonas could relate to the prevalence of L. monocytogenes and Listeria spp. in ready-to-eat meat processing environments. Samples were 3.3% (3/90) positive for L. monocytogenes, and 12.2% (11/90) of samples were positive for Listeria spp. Pseudomonas spp. were also isolated. When Listeria spp. and Pseudomonas spp. were assayed for biofilm production and resistance to a quaternary ammonia sanitizer, multiple isolates belonging to both genera capable of forming biofilms were identified. Four Pseudomonas spp. isolates resisted the 200 ppm manufacturer-recommended sanitizer concentration for food contact surface sanitation, and one Pseudomonas spp. isolated from a drain sample that was also positive for L. monocytogenes demonstrated a sanitizer minimum bactericidal concentration of 1000 ppm. These findings further support the need for monitoring of small and very small meat processors for L. monocytogenes as well as highlight the need to identify other bacteria in these processing environments, like Pseudomonas, that are resistant to environmental stressors.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.