服用地匹罗对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者术后镇痛和阿司匹林效果的影响:前瞻性随机 DipASA 研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Walter Petermichl, Peter-Paul Ellmauer, Anne Benning, Florian Zeman, Christof Schmid, Andrea Stadlbauer, Susanne Heimerl, Timo Seyfried, Sebastian Blecha
{"title":"服用地匹罗对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者术后镇痛和阿司匹林效果的影响:前瞻性随机 DipASA 研究。","authors":"Walter Petermichl, Peter-Paul Ellmauer, Anne Benning, Florian Zeman, Christof Schmid, Andrea Stadlbauer, Susanne Heimerl, Timo Seyfried, Sebastian Blecha","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of dipyrone administration on postoperative analgesia and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) effect in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective randomized study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-university hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Ninety-eight patients who underwent CABG between April 2022 and May 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The ASA effect was measured at 6 time points with impedance aggregometry (Multiplate) and thromboelastography (TEG6s Platelet Mapping). Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: intravenous ASA and dipyrone at the same time (group 1), intravenous ASA and dipyrone with a 2-hour delay (group 2), and intravenous ASA alone (group 3). Postoperative analgesic effects (numeric rating scale) and the prevalence of potential ASA non-response (defined as ASPI >40 U and TEG-ASA inhibition <50%) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Of 90 analyzed patients, 80 took ASA preoperatively. All patients received intravenous ASA 100 mg from postoperative day 1. The effect of ASA did not significantly differ between the study groups at any time for either platelet function test. NRS values did not differ between the study groups at any time (p = 0.469). Patients in group 3 received significantly more additional co-analgesics than patients who received dipyrone (p = 0.005). ASA non-response was detected in 38.9% and 67.8% on the seventh postoperative day, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dipyrone given after CABG seems safe and did not show any significant effect on platelet inhibition after ASA administration. Patients taking dipyrone postoperatively need significantly fewer additional coanalgesics. The ASA effect on platelet function should be checked at least once after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"121-130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Dipyrone Administration on Postoperative Analgesia and Aspirin Effect in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The Prospective Randomized DipASA Study.\",\"authors\":\"Walter Petermichl, Peter-Paul Ellmauer, Anne Benning, Florian Zeman, Christof Schmid, Andrea Stadlbauer, Susanne Heimerl, Timo Seyfried, Sebastian Blecha\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.10.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of dipyrone administration on postoperative analgesia and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) effect in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective randomized study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-university hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Ninety-eight patients who underwent CABG between April 2022 and May 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The ASA effect was measured at 6 time points with impedance aggregometry (Multiplate) and thromboelastography (TEG6s Platelet Mapping). Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: intravenous ASA and dipyrone at the same time (group 1), intravenous ASA and dipyrone with a 2-hour delay (group 2), and intravenous ASA alone (group 3). Postoperative analgesic effects (numeric rating scale) and the prevalence of potential ASA non-response (defined as ASPI >40 U and TEG-ASA inhibition <50%) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Of 90 analyzed patients, 80 took ASA preoperatively. All patients received intravenous ASA 100 mg from postoperative day 1. The effect of ASA did not significantly differ between the study groups at any time for either platelet function test. NRS values did not differ between the study groups at any time (p = 0.469). Patients in group 3 received significantly more additional co-analgesics than patients who received dipyrone (p = 0.005). ASA non-response was detected in 38.9% and 67.8% on the seventh postoperative day, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dipyrone given after CABG seems safe and did not show any significant effect on platelet inhibition after ASA administration. Patients taking dipyrone postoperatively need significantly fewer additional coanalgesics. The ASA effect on platelet function should be checked at least once after surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"121-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.10.009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.10.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的该研究旨在探讨服用二吡喃酮对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者术后镇痛和乙酰水杨酸(ASA)效果的影响:前瞻性随机研究:参与者:98 名接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者:干预措施:通过阻抗聚集仪(Multiplate)和血栓弹性成像(TEG6s Platelet Mapping)在6个时间点测量ASA效果。患者被随机分为 3 组中的 1 组:同时静脉注射 ASA 和地匹隆(第 1 组)、延迟 2 小时静脉注射 ASA 和地匹隆(第 2 组)以及单独静脉注射 ASA(第 3 组)。术后镇痛效果(数字评分表)和潜在的 ASA 无应答率(定义为 ASPI >40 U 和 TEG-ASA 抑制 测量和主要结果:在 90 名接受分析的患者中,80 人术前服用了 ASA。所有患者从术后第 1 天开始静脉注射 100 毫克 ASA。在血小板功能测试中,各研究组在任何时间服用 ASA 的效果均无明显差异。各研究组的 NRS 值在任何时间均无差异(p = 0.469)。第 3 组患者接受的额外辅助镇痛剂明显多于接受二吡喃酮的患者(p = 0.005)。在术后第七天,分别有 38.9% 和 67.8% 的患者检测到 ASA 无应答:结论:在 CABG 术后服用地匹隆似乎是安全的,而且对服用 ASA 后的血小板抑制作用没有明显影响。术后服用地匹隆的患者需要额外服用的镇痛药明显减少。术后至少应检查一次 ASA 对血小板功能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Dipyrone Administration on Postoperative Analgesia and Aspirin Effect in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The Prospective Randomized DipASA Study.

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of dipyrone administration on postoperative analgesia and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) effect in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Design: A prospective randomized study.

Setting: Single-university hospital setting.

Participants: Ninety-eight patients who underwent CABG between April 2022 and May 2023.

Interventions: The ASA effect was measured at 6 time points with impedance aggregometry (Multiplate) and thromboelastography (TEG6s Platelet Mapping). Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: intravenous ASA and dipyrone at the same time (group 1), intravenous ASA and dipyrone with a 2-hour delay (group 2), and intravenous ASA alone (group 3). Postoperative analgesic effects (numeric rating scale) and the prevalence of potential ASA non-response (defined as ASPI >40 U and TEG-ASA inhibition <50%) were recorded.

Measurements and main results: Of 90 analyzed patients, 80 took ASA preoperatively. All patients received intravenous ASA 100 mg from postoperative day 1. The effect of ASA did not significantly differ between the study groups at any time for either platelet function test. NRS values did not differ between the study groups at any time (p = 0.469). Patients in group 3 received significantly more additional co-analgesics than patients who received dipyrone (p = 0.005). ASA non-response was detected in 38.9% and 67.8% on the seventh postoperative day, respectively.

Conclusions: Dipyrone given after CABG seems safe and did not show any significant effect on platelet inhibition after ASA administration. Patients taking dipyrone postoperatively need significantly fewer additional coanalgesics. The ASA effect on platelet function should be checked at least once after surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信