纤维蛋白溶解剂在治疗小儿肺水肿中的现代应用。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Maria Grazia Sacco Casamassima, Janelle R Noel-MacDonnell, Tolulope A Oyetunji, Shawn D St Peter
{"title":"纤维蛋白溶解剂在治疗小儿肺水肿中的现代应用。","authors":"Maria Grazia Sacco Casamassima, Janelle R Noel-MacDonnell, Tolulope A Oyetunji, Shawn D St Peter","doi":"10.1007/s00383-024-05868-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study seeks to investigate the contemporary use and effectiveness of fibrinolysis as a first-line option in pediatric empyema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) was queried to identify patients with empyema without fistula (2018-2023). First-line treatments were chest drainage (CD), chest drainage with fibrinolysis (CDF), and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery/open decortication (VATS/OD). Outcomes between groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-Square tests. Multivariate generalized linear model was used to account for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>581 individuals/cases met inclusion criteria. CD accounted for 11.9% of cases, CDF for 67.6%, and VATS/OD for 20.7%. After adjusting for covariates differences in LOS were not significant (p = 0.393). Subsequent VATS/ODs were required in 6.9% of CDF cases, 8.9% of CD, and 3.3% of primary VATS/OD. Additionally, 32.5% of primary VATS/OD received adjuvant fibrinolysis. Complications were more often observed in the VATS/OD group compared to CD and CDF (11.7% vs 5.8% and 4.1% respectively; p = .008). There were no differences in 30-day readmission rate (VATS/OD:1.2%, CTD:1.5%, and CTDF:1%; p = 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fibrinolysis is now utilized as first-line treatment for most patients and as adjunct in other approaches. The findings justify further implementation as it is the less invasive first-line primary therapy in patients with empyema.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"40 1","pages":"289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary use of fibrinolytics in the management of pediatric empyema.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Grazia Sacco Casamassima, Janelle R Noel-MacDonnell, Tolulope A Oyetunji, Shawn D St Peter\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00383-024-05868-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study seeks to investigate the contemporary use and effectiveness of fibrinolysis as a first-line option in pediatric empyema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) was queried to identify patients with empyema without fistula (2018-2023). First-line treatments were chest drainage (CD), chest drainage with fibrinolysis (CDF), and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery/open decortication (VATS/OD). Outcomes between groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-Square tests. Multivariate generalized linear model was used to account for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>581 individuals/cases met inclusion criteria. CD accounted for 11.9% of cases, CDF for 67.6%, and VATS/OD for 20.7%. After adjusting for covariates differences in LOS were not significant (p = 0.393). Subsequent VATS/ODs were required in 6.9% of CDF cases, 8.9% of CD, and 3.3% of primary VATS/OD. Additionally, 32.5% of primary VATS/OD received adjuvant fibrinolysis. Complications were more often observed in the VATS/OD group compared to CD and CDF (11.7% vs 5.8% and 4.1% respectively; p = .008). There were no differences in 30-day readmission rate (VATS/OD:1.2%, CTD:1.5%, and CTDF:1%; p = 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fibrinolysis is now utilized as first-line treatment for most patients and as adjunct in other approaches. The findings justify further implementation as it is the less invasive first-line primary therapy in patients with empyema.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Surgery International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05868-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05868-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在调查纤维蛋白溶解术作为小儿肺水肿一线治疗方案的当代应用和有效性:本研究旨在调查纤维蛋白溶解术作为小儿肺水肿一线治疗方案的当代使用情况和有效性:通过查询儿科健康信息系统(PHIS),确定无瘘管的肺水肿患者(2018-2023年)。一线治疗方法为胸腔引流术(CD)、胸腔引流加纤维蛋白溶解术(CDF)和视频辅助胸腔镜手术/开胸去瘘术(VATS/OD)。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Chi-Square 检验比较各组间的结果。使用多变量广义线性模型来考虑协变量:581人/病例符合纳入标准。CD占11.9%,CDF占67.6%,VATS/OD占20.7%。调整协变量后,LOS差异不显著(P = 0.393)。6.9% 的 CDF 病例、8.9% 的 CD 病例和 3.3% 的初诊 VATS/OD 病例需要进行后续 VATS/OD。此外,32.5%的原发性VATS/OD接受了辅助纤维蛋白溶解术。与 CD 和 CDF 相比,VATS/OD 组的并发症发生率更高(分别为 11.7% vs 5.8% 和 4.1%;P = .008)。30天再入院率没有差异(VATS/OD:1.2%,CTD:1.5%,CTDF:1%;P = 0.83):结论:纤维蛋白溶解术是目前大多数患者的一线治疗方法,也是其他方法的辅助手段。结论:纤维蛋白溶解术是目前大多数患者的一线治疗方法,也是其他治疗方法的辅助手段。这些研究结果证明,纤维蛋白溶解术是治疗肺水肿患者创伤较小的一线主要疗法,因此有理由进一步推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contemporary use of fibrinolytics in the management of pediatric empyema.

Background: This study seeks to investigate the contemporary use and effectiveness of fibrinolysis as a first-line option in pediatric empyema.

Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) was queried to identify patients with empyema without fistula (2018-2023). First-line treatments were chest drainage (CD), chest drainage with fibrinolysis (CDF), and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery/open decortication (VATS/OD). Outcomes between groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-Square tests. Multivariate generalized linear model was used to account for covariates.

Results: 581 individuals/cases met inclusion criteria. CD accounted for 11.9% of cases, CDF for 67.6%, and VATS/OD for 20.7%. After adjusting for covariates differences in LOS were not significant (p = 0.393). Subsequent VATS/ODs were required in 6.9% of CDF cases, 8.9% of CD, and 3.3% of primary VATS/OD. Additionally, 32.5% of primary VATS/OD received adjuvant fibrinolysis. Complications were more often observed in the VATS/OD group compared to CD and CDF (11.7% vs 5.8% and 4.1% respectively; p = .008). There were no differences in 30-day readmission rate (VATS/OD:1.2%, CTD:1.5%, and CTDF:1%; p = 0.83).

Conclusion: Fibrinolysis is now utilized as first-line treatment for most patients and as adjunct in other approaches. The findings justify further implementation as it is the less invasive first-line primary therapy in patients with empyema.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信