Chase Nelson, Gerald Anderson, Allison Larimore, Kirsten Dansey, Benjamin W Starnes, Sara L Zettervall
{"title":"主动脉血栓对使用医师改良内移植物修复并肾动脉瘤后疗效的影响","authors":"Chase Nelson, Gerald Anderson, Allison Larimore, Kirsten Dansey, Benjamin W Starnes, Sara L Zettervall","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.10.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Studies have suggested that aortic thrombus may be associated with adverse outcomes following endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms, while other reports have suggested higher rates of sac regression and reduced risk of endoleak. However, the effect of thrombus burden on outcomes following physician modified endografts (PMEGs) remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the volume and morphology of thrombus burden and the effect on outcomes following PMEG for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent PMEG from 2009 to 2021 in a single centre, investigational device exemption trial. Thrombus burden was measured as a percentage of luminal volume using pre-operative computed tomography scans from the lowest renal artery to the level of the aortic bifurcation using centreline reconstructive software. Morphology was documented by the presence of finger like projections. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the impact on peri-operative and long term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Volumetrical and morphological measures of thrombus burden were assessed in 142 patients; 40.1% of the cohort were classified as having a high thrombus burden (≥ 50% luminal volume) on volumetrical assessment and 22.5% had finger like projections on morphological assessment. Type II endoleak was more frequently observed in those with low thrombus burden (60.0% vs. 33.3%; p = .008) and persisted after multivariate analysis (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 - 5.8), but there were no other significant differences in peri-operative adverse events or late outcomes-including sac behaviour, freedom from re-intervention, and overall survival-when stratifying thrombus burden by quantitative or qualitative measures. There were no observed differences in operative characteristics or anatomical characteristics, including landing zone characteristics and rates of inferior mesenteric artery patency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While thrombus burden and morphology were not associated with adverse peri-operative events or survival, low thrombus burden was associated with an increase in type II endoleak. These findings suggest that thrombus burden should not deter treatment for patients requiring PMEG.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Aortic Thrombus on Outcomes Following Repair of Juxtarenal Aneurysm Using Physician Modified Endografts.\",\"authors\":\"Chase Nelson, Gerald Anderson, Allison Larimore, Kirsten Dansey, Benjamin W Starnes, Sara L Zettervall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.10.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Studies have suggested that aortic thrombus may be associated with adverse outcomes following endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms, while other reports have suggested higher rates of sac regression and reduced risk of endoleak. However, the effect of thrombus burden on outcomes following physician modified endografts (PMEGs) remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the volume and morphology of thrombus burden and the effect on outcomes following PMEG for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent PMEG from 2009 to 2021 in a single centre, investigational device exemption trial. Thrombus burden was measured as a percentage of luminal volume using pre-operative computed tomography scans from the lowest renal artery to the level of the aortic bifurcation using centreline reconstructive software. Morphology was documented by the presence of finger like projections. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the impact on peri-operative and long term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Volumetrical and morphological measures of thrombus burden were assessed in 142 patients; 40.1% of the cohort were classified as having a high thrombus burden (≥ 50% luminal volume) on volumetrical assessment and 22.5% had finger like projections on morphological assessment. Type II endoleak was more frequently observed in those with low thrombus burden (60.0% vs. 33.3%; p = .008) and persisted after multivariate analysis (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 - 5.8), but there were no other significant differences in peri-operative adverse events or late outcomes-including sac behaviour, freedom from re-intervention, and overall survival-when stratifying thrombus burden by quantitative or qualitative measures. There were no observed differences in operative characteristics or anatomical characteristics, including landing zone characteristics and rates of inferior mesenteric artery patency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While thrombus burden and morphology were not associated with adverse peri-operative events or survival, low thrombus burden was associated with an increase in type II endoleak. These findings suggest that thrombus burden should not deter treatment for patients requiring PMEG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.10.035\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.10.035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究表明,主动脉血栓可能与主动脉瘤血管内修复术后的不良预后有关,而其他报告则表明,血栓囊消退率较高,内漏风险较低。然而,血栓负担对医生改良内支架(PMEGs)术后效果的影响仍然未知。本研究旨在评估血栓负荷的体积和形态,以及对并arenal腹主动脉瘤PMEG术后疗效的影响:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2009年至2021年在单中心研究设备豁免试验中接受PMEG治疗的患者。使用中心线重建软件,通过术前计算机断层扫描从最低肾动脉到主动脉分叉水平测量血栓负担占管腔容积的百分比。形态学通过指状突起的存在进行记录。单变量和多变量分析评估了对围术期和长期疗效的影响:对142名患者的血栓负担进行了体积和形态学评估;40.1%的患者在体积评估中被归类为高血栓负担(管腔体积≥50%),22.5%的患者在形态学评估中出现手指样突起。低血栓负荷者更常观察到 II 型内漏(60.0% 对 33.3%;P = .008),多变量分析后仍存在 II 型内漏(几率比 2.5,95% 置信区间 1.1 - 5.8),但通过定量或定性指标对血栓负荷进行分层后,围手术期不良事件或后期结果(包括囊行为、不再再次介入治疗的自由度和总生存率)没有其他显著差异。在手术特征或解剖特征(包括着床区特征和肠系膜下动脉通畅率)方面没有观察到差异:结论:虽然血栓负荷和形态与围手术期不良事件或存活率无关,但低血栓负荷与II型内漏的增加有关。这些研究结果表明,血栓负荷不应阻碍对需要进行 PMEG 患者的治疗。
Effect of Aortic Thrombus on Outcomes Following Repair of Juxtarenal Aneurysm Using Physician Modified Endografts.
Objective: Studies have suggested that aortic thrombus may be associated with adverse outcomes following endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms, while other reports have suggested higher rates of sac regression and reduced risk of endoleak. However, the effect of thrombus burden on outcomes following physician modified endografts (PMEGs) remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the volume and morphology of thrombus burden and the effect on outcomes following PMEG for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent PMEG from 2009 to 2021 in a single centre, investigational device exemption trial. Thrombus burden was measured as a percentage of luminal volume using pre-operative computed tomography scans from the lowest renal artery to the level of the aortic bifurcation using centreline reconstructive software. Morphology was documented by the presence of finger like projections. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the impact on peri-operative and long term outcomes.
Results: Volumetrical and morphological measures of thrombus burden were assessed in 142 patients; 40.1% of the cohort were classified as having a high thrombus burden (≥ 50% luminal volume) on volumetrical assessment and 22.5% had finger like projections on morphological assessment. Type II endoleak was more frequently observed in those with low thrombus burden (60.0% vs. 33.3%; p = .008) and persisted after multivariate analysis (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 - 5.8), but there were no other significant differences in peri-operative adverse events or late outcomes-including sac behaviour, freedom from re-intervention, and overall survival-when stratifying thrombus burden by quantitative or qualitative measures. There were no observed differences in operative characteristics or anatomical characteristics, including landing zone characteristics and rates of inferior mesenteric artery patency.
Conclusion: While thrombus burden and morphology were not associated with adverse peri-operative events or survival, low thrombus burden was associated with an increase in type II endoleak. These findings suggest that thrombus burden should not deter treatment for patients requiring PMEG.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles.
Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.