独活寄生汤治疗退化性膝骨关节炎的疗效、安全性和经济可行性:多中心、随机、评估者盲法对照试验方案。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S487089
Wonnam Kim, Yeon-Cheol Park, Bonhyuk Goo, Jung-Hyun Kim, Dongwoo Nam, Eunseok Kim, Hyun-Jong Lee, Dong-Hyun Pyun, Hae Sun Suh, Yoonsung Lee, Man S Kim, Byung-Kwan Seo, Yong-Hyeon Baek
{"title":"独活寄生汤治疗退化性膝骨关节炎的疗效、安全性和经济可行性:多中心、随机、评估者盲法对照试验方案。","authors":"Wonnam Kim, Yeon-Cheol Park, Bonhyuk Goo, Jung-Hyun Kim, Dongwoo Nam, Eunseok Kim, Hyun-Jong Lee, Dong-Hyun Pyun, Hae Sun Suh, Yoonsung Lee, Man S Kim, Byung-Kwan Seo, Yong-Hyeon Baek","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S487089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most prevalent degenerative joint diseases worldwide. The herbal decoction, Dokhwalgisaeng-tang (DHGST), has been commonly used in East Asia to treat osteoarthritis. However, there is insufficient evidence to draw clear conclusions concerning its effectiveness and safety for patients with KOA. We aim to determine the efficacy, safety, and economic feasibility of DHGST compared with Celecoxib, an oral COX-2 inhibitor, for patients with degenerative KOA.</p><p><strong>Trial design and methods: </strong>This multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, involving 160 participants who will be randomized using block randomization with 1:1 allocation, will compare DHGST and Celecoxib. The total trial period is 24 weeks after random allocation, comprising 12 weeks of treatment and 12 weeks of follow-up. Participants with KOA will be administered 200 mg of DHGST (treatment group) or Celecoxib capsules (control group) for 12 weeks. Efficacy and safety evaluations will be conducted at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12, and 24. The primary outcome measurement is the Korean Western Ontario McMaster score at week 12. Changes in pain intensity using a 100 mm visual analog scale, changes in quality of life using a EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level self-report survey, and patient satisfaction will also be measured to evaluate effectiveness between the two groups. A trial-based economic feasibility evaluation will be conducted to analyze treatment cost-effectiveness from societal and healthcare system perspectives. Drug safety will be assessed through adverse reactions and laboratory test findings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This trial protocol has the following limitations. Applying a double-dummy design is not possible, as the tablet and granule forms can easily be distinguished visually, and achieving participant blinding is challenging. The trial findings are intended to inform participants, physicians, and other stakeholders in determining whether DHGST could be used as an alternative therapeutic option for KOA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>KCT0008424 (Clinical Research Information Service of the Republic of Korea), registered on 12 May 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"3501-3510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy, Safety, and Economic Feasibility of Dokhwalgisaeng-Tang for Degenerative Knee Osteoarthritis: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Assessor Blinded, Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Wonnam Kim, Yeon-Cheol Park, Bonhyuk Goo, Jung-Hyun Kim, Dongwoo Nam, Eunseok Kim, Hyun-Jong Lee, Dong-Hyun Pyun, Hae Sun Suh, Yoonsung Lee, Man S Kim, Byung-Kwan Seo, Yong-Hyeon Baek\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S487089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most prevalent degenerative joint diseases worldwide. The herbal decoction, Dokhwalgisaeng-tang (DHGST), has been commonly used in East Asia to treat osteoarthritis. However, there is insufficient evidence to draw clear conclusions concerning its effectiveness and safety for patients with KOA. We aim to determine the efficacy, safety, and economic feasibility of DHGST compared with Celecoxib, an oral COX-2 inhibitor, for patients with degenerative KOA.</p><p><strong>Trial design and methods: </strong>This multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, involving 160 participants who will be randomized using block randomization with 1:1 allocation, will compare DHGST and Celecoxib. The total trial period is 24 weeks after random allocation, comprising 12 weeks of treatment and 12 weeks of follow-up. Participants with KOA will be administered 200 mg of DHGST (treatment group) or Celecoxib capsules (control group) for 12 weeks. Efficacy and safety evaluations will be conducted at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12, and 24. The primary outcome measurement is the Korean Western Ontario McMaster score at week 12. Changes in pain intensity using a 100 mm visual analog scale, changes in quality of life using a EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level self-report survey, and patient satisfaction will also be measured to evaluate effectiveness between the two groups. A trial-based economic feasibility evaluation will be conducted to analyze treatment cost-effectiveness from societal and healthcare system perspectives. Drug safety will be assessed through adverse reactions and laboratory test findings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This trial protocol has the following limitations. Applying a double-dummy design is not possible, as the tablet and granule forms can easily be distinguished visually, and achieving participant blinding is challenging. The trial findings are intended to inform participants, physicians, and other stakeholders in determining whether DHGST could be used as an alternative therapeutic option for KOA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>KCT0008424 (Clinical Research Information Service of the Republic of Korea), registered on 12 May 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"3501-3510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529369/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S487089\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S487089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)是全球最常见的退行性关节疾病之一。东亚地区常用草药煎剂独活寄生汤(DHGST)治疗骨关节炎。然而,目前还没有足够的证据就其对 KOA 患者的有效性和安全性得出明确的结论。我们旨在确定 DHGST 与口服 COX-2 抑制剂塞来昔布相比,对退行性 KOA 患者的疗效、安全性和经济可行性:这项多中心、随机、非劣效性试验将对 DHGST 和塞来昔布进行比较,160 名参与者将采用 1:1 分配的分块随机法进行随机分组。随机分配后的总试验期为 24 周,包括 12 周的治疗和 12 周的随访。KOA患者将在12周内服用200毫克DHGST(治疗组)或塞来昔布胶囊(对照组)。疗效和安全性评估将在第 0、4、8、12 和 24 周进行。主要结果测量是第 12 周时的韩国西安大略麦克马斯特评分。此外,还将使用 100 毫米视觉模拟量表测量疼痛强度的变化、使用 EuroQol 5 维 5 级自我报告调查测量生活质量的变化以及患者满意度,以评估两组患者的疗效。还将进行一项基于试验的经济可行性评估,从社会和医疗保健系统的角度分析治疗的成本效益。药物安全性将通过不良反应和实验室检测结果进行评估:本试验方案存在以下局限性。由于片剂和颗粒剂在视觉上很容易区分,因此不可能采用双假体设计,而且对参与者进行盲法也具有挑战性。试验结果旨在为参与者、医生和其他利益相关者提供信息,以确定 DHGST 是否可用作 KOA 的替代疗法:试验注册号:KCT0008424(大韩民国临床研究信息服务部),注册日期:2023年5月12日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy, Safety, and Economic Feasibility of Dokhwalgisaeng-Tang for Degenerative Knee Osteoarthritis: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Assessor Blinded, Controlled Trial.

Purpose: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most prevalent degenerative joint diseases worldwide. The herbal decoction, Dokhwalgisaeng-tang (DHGST), has been commonly used in East Asia to treat osteoarthritis. However, there is insufficient evidence to draw clear conclusions concerning its effectiveness and safety for patients with KOA. We aim to determine the efficacy, safety, and economic feasibility of DHGST compared with Celecoxib, an oral COX-2 inhibitor, for patients with degenerative KOA.

Trial design and methods: This multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, involving 160 participants who will be randomized using block randomization with 1:1 allocation, will compare DHGST and Celecoxib. The total trial period is 24 weeks after random allocation, comprising 12 weeks of treatment and 12 weeks of follow-up. Participants with KOA will be administered 200 mg of DHGST (treatment group) or Celecoxib capsules (control group) for 12 weeks. Efficacy and safety evaluations will be conducted at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12, and 24. The primary outcome measurement is the Korean Western Ontario McMaster score at week 12. Changes in pain intensity using a 100 mm visual analog scale, changes in quality of life using a EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level self-report survey, and patient satisfaction will also be measured to evaluate effectiveness between the two groups. A trial-based economic feasibility evaluation will be conducted to analyze treatment cost-effectiveness from societal and healthcare system perspectives. Drug safety will be assessed through adverse reactions and laboratory test findings.

Discussion: This trial protocol has the following limitations. Applying a double-dummy design is not possible, as the tablet and granule forms can easily be distinguished visually, and achieving participant blinding is challenging. The trial findings are intended to inform participants, physicians, and other stakeholders in determining whether DHGST could be used as an alternative therapeutic option for KOA.

Trial registration number: KCT0008424 (Clinical Research Information Service of the Republic of Korea), registered on 12 May 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信