小剂量四环素、阿莫西林四联疗法治疗幽门螺旋杆菌感染的有效性和安全性:一项回顾性单中心研究。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yi-Ru Zhao, Xin-Jie Wang, Meng-Jia Zhu, Ang-Li Chen, Dian Zhang, Qin Du, John J Kim, Wei-Ling Hu
{"title":"小剂量四环素、阿莫西林四联疗法治疗幽门螺旋杆菌感染的有效性和安全性:一项回顾性单中心研究。","authors":"Yi-Ru Zhao, Xin-Jie Wang, Meng-Jia Zhu, Ang-Li Chen, Dian Zhang, Qin Du, John J Kim, Wei-Ling Hu","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v30.i39.4295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) eradication rates have declined with the rise of antibiotic-resistant strains in recent years. Although highly effective with a low prevalence of resistance, standard dose tetracycline is associated with frequent adverse events. The efficacy and safety of low-dose tetracycline as part of tetracycline and amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy are not well described.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose compared to standard dose tetracycline with combined amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy in patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection receiving tetracycline, amoxicillin, proton pump inhibitor, and bismuth for 14 days at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (1/2022-6/2023) were evaluated. The low-dose tetracycline group received tetracycline 500 mg twice daily (bid) while the standard dose group received 750 mg bid or 500 mg three times daily (tid). Primary endpoints were <i>H. pylori</i> eradication rate and treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the 218 patients was 48.7 ± 14.0 years, 120 (55%) were male, and 118 (54.1%) received treatment as primary therapy. Furthermore, 73 (33%) patients received low-dose tetracycline (500 mg bid) and 145 (67%) received standard dose tetracycline including 500 mg tid in 74 (33%) and 750 mg bid in 71 (33%). On intention-to-treat analysis, <i>H. pylori</i> eradication rates were 89% [95% confidence interval (CI): 82%-96%] in the 500 mg bid group, 82% (95%CI: 74%-91%) in the 500 mg tid group, and 79% (95%CI: 69%-89%) in the 750 mg bid group without a statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.25). The incidence of adverse events was lower in the low-dose compared to the standard dose group (12.3% <i>vs</i> 31.1% or 23.9%; <i>P</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-dose tetracycline combined with amoxicillin quadruple therapy for 14 days achieved a high eradication rate and fewer adverse events compared to the standard dose tetracycline regimen in patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"30 39","pages":"4295-4304"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11525849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of low-dose tetracycline, amoxicillin quadruple therapy in <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection: A retrospective single center study.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Ru Zhao, Xin-Jie Wang, Meng-Jia Zhu, Ang-Li Chen, Dian Zhang, Qin Du, John J Kim, Wei-Ling Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.3748/wjg.v30.i39.4295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) eradication rates have declined with the rise of antibiotic-resistant strains in recent years. Although highly effective with a low prevalence of resistance, standard dose tetracycline is associated with frequent adverse events. The efficacy and safety of low-dose tetracycline as part of tetracycline and amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy are not well described.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose compared to standard dose tetracycline with combined amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy in patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection receiving tetracycline, amoxicillin, proton pump inhibitor, and bismuth for 14 days at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (1/2022-6/2023) were evaluated. The low-dose tetracycline group received tetracycline 500 mg twice daily (bid) while the standard dose group received 750 mg bid or 500 mg three times daily (tid). Primary endpoints were <i>H. pylori</i> eradication rate and treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the 218 patients was 48.7 ± 14.0 years, 120 (55%) were male, and 118 (54.1%) received treatment as primary therapy. Furthermore, 73 (33%) patients received low-dose tetracycline (500 mg bid) and 145 (67%) received standard dose tetracycline including 500 mg tid in 74 (33%) and 750 mg bid in 71 (33%). On intention-to-treat analysis, <i>H. pylori</i> eradication rates were 89% [95% confidence interval (CI): 82%-96%] in the 500 mg bid group, 82% (95%CI: 74%-91%) in the 500 mg tid group, and 79% (95%CI: 69%-89%) in the 750 mg bid group without a statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.25). The incidence of adverse events was lower in the low-dose compared to the standard dose group (12.3% <i>vs</i> 31.1% or 23.9%; <i>P</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-dose tetracycline combined with amoxicillin quadruple therapy for 14 days achieved a high eradication rate and fewer adverse events compared to the standard dose tetracycline regimen in patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"30 39\",\"pages\":\"4295-4304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11525849/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i39.4295\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i39.4295","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,随着抗生素耐药菌株的增多,幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)的根除率有所下降。标准剂量的四环素虽然疗效显著且耐药性较低,但却经常出现不良反应。低剂量四环素作为四环素和含阿莫西林铋剂四联疗法的一部分,其疗效和安全性尚未得到很好的描述。目的:比较低剂量四环素与标准剂量四环素和含阿莫西林铋剂四联疗法在幽门螺杆菌感染患者中的疗效和安全性:方法:对邵逸夫医院连续14天(1/2022-6/2023)接受四环素、阿莫西林、质子泵抑制剂和铋剂治疗的幽门螺杆菌感染患者进行评估。低剂量四环素组服用四环素 500 毫克,每天两次(bid);标准剂量组服用 750 毫克,每天两次(bid)或 500 毫克,每天三次(tid)。主要终点是幽门螺杆菌根除率和治疗相关不良事件:218名患者的平均年龄为(48.7 ± 14.0)岁,120人(55%)为男性,118人(54.1%)接受了主要治疗。此外,73 名患者(33%)接受低剂量四环素(500 毫克/次)治疗,145 名患者(67%)接受标准剂量四环素治疗,其中 74 名患者(33%)接受 500 毫克/次治疗,71 名患者(33%)接受 750 毫克/次治疗。根据意向治疗分析,500 毫克服用组的幽门螺杆菌根除率为 89% [95% 置信区间 (CI):82%-96%],500 毫克服用组为 82%(95%CI:74%-91%),750 毫克服用组为 79%(95%CI:69%-89%),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.25)。低剂量组的不良反应发生率低于标准剂量组(12.3% vs 31.1%或23.9%;P = 0.02):结论:与标准剂量四环素疗法相比,低剂量四环素联合阿莫西林四联疗法14天对幽门螺杆菌感染患者的根除率高,不良反应少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of low-dose tetracycline, amoxicillin quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori infection: A retrospective single center study.

Background: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rates have declined with the rise of antibiotic-resistant strains in recent years. Although highly effective with a low prevalence of resistance, standard dose tetracycline is associated with frequent adverse events. The efficacy and safety of low-dose tetracycline as part of tetracycline and amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy are not well described.

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose compared to standard dose tetracycline with combined amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy in patients with H. pylori infection.

Methods: Consecutive patients with H. pylori infection receiving tetracycline, amoxicillin, proton pump inhibitor, and bismuth for 14 days at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (1/2022-6/2023) were evaluated. The low-dose tetracycline group received tetracycline 500 mg twice daily (bid) while the standard dose group received 750 mg bid or 500 mg three times daily (tid). Primary endpoints were H. pylori eradication rate and treatment-related adverse events.

Results: The mean age of the 218 patients was 48.7 ± 14.0 years, 120 (55%) were male, and 118 (54.1%) received treatment as primary therapy. Furthermore, 73 (33%) patients received low-dose tetracycline (500 mg bid) and 145 (67%) received standard dose tetracycline including 500 mg tid in 74 (33%) and 750 mg bid in 71 (33%). On intention-to-treat analysis, H. pylori eradication rates were 89% [95% confidence interval (CI): 82%-96%] in the 500 mg bid group, 82% (95%CI: 74%-91%) in the 500 mg tid group, and 79% (95%CI: 69%-89%) in the 750 mg bid group without a statistically significant difference (P = 0.25). The incidence of adverse events was lower in the low-dose compared to the standard dose group (12.3% vs 31.1% or 23.9%; P = 0.02).

Conclusion: Low-dose tetracycline combined with amoxicillin quadruple therapy for 14 days achieved a high eradication rate and fewer adverse events compared to the standard dose tetracycline regimen in patients with H. pylori infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastroenterology
World Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
464
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信