Julie A Theurer, Rosemary Martino, Nedeljko Jovanovic, John R de Almeida, David P Goldstein, Kevin Fung, John Yoo, S Danielle MacNeil, Eric Winquist, J Alex Hammond, Varagur Venkatesan, Nancy Read, Sarah Kuruvilla, Andrew Warner, Philip C Doyle, Ian Ross, Colleen Dreyer, Sarah Hawkins, Kendra Thouless, Courtney McCallum, David A Palma, Anthony C Nichols
{"title":"经口机器人手术与放射治疗对口咽癌患者吞咽功能的影响：一项随机试验的子研究。","authors":"Julie A Theurer, Rosemary Martino, Nedeljko Jovanovic, John R de Almeida, David P Goldstein, Kevin Fung, John Yoo, S Danielle MacNeil, Eric Winquist, J Alex Hammond, Varagur Venkatesan, Nancy Read, Sarah Kuruvilla, Andrew Warner, Philip C Doyle, Ian Ross, Colleen Dreyer, Sarah Hawkins, Kendra Thouless, Courtney McCallum, David A Palma, Anthony C Nichols","doi":"10.1002/hed.27986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This ORATOR sub-study evaluated swallowing physiology in patients treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) versus radiotherapy (RT) for early-stage oropharynx cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Swallowing physiology was evaluated using videofluoroscopy and outcomes were compared across treatment arms and correlated with MDADI scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 68 patients in the ORATOR trial, 21 participated in this sub-study (30.8%), including 15 RT Arm and six TORS Arm patients. Swallowing profiles were not significantly different between the arms. MBSImP pharyngeal scores for RT Arm versus TORS Arm patients were 4.8 (±2.1) versus 4.3 (±1.5) at baseline, 6.2 (±1.2) versus 9.6 (±4.8) at 6 months and 5.9 (±1.8) versus 8.0 (±4.7) at 12 months. MBSImP pharyngeal scores demonstrated weak associations with several MDADI subscales and PAS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To best describe swallowing outcomes in studies of RT and/or surgery, instrumental swallowing assessments should be strongly considered in addition to quality of life measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Transoral Robotic Surgery Versus Radiation on Swallowing Function in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients: A Sub-Study From a Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Julie A Theurer, Rosemary Martino, Nedeljko Jovanovic, John R de Almeida, David P Goldstein, Kevin Fung, John Yoo, S Danielle MacNeil, Eric Winquist, J Alex Hammond, Varagur Venkatesan, Nancy Read, Sarah Kuruvilla, Andrew Warner, Philip C Doyle, Ian Ross, Colleen Dreyer, Sarah Hawkins, Kendra Thouless, Courtney McCallum, David A Palma, Anthony C Nichols\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hed.27986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This ORATOR sub-study evaluated swallowing physiology in patients treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) versus radiotherapy (RT) for early-stage oropharynx cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Swallowing physiology was evaluated using videofluoroscopy and outcomes were compared across treatment arms and correlated with MDADI scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 68 patients in the ORATOR trial, 21 participated in this sub-study (30.8%), including 15 RT Arm and six TORS Arm patients. Swallowing profiles were not significantly different between the arms. MBSImP pharyngeal scores for RT Arm versus TORS Arm patients were 4.8 (±2.1) versus 4.3 (±1.5) at baseline, 6.2 (±1.2) versus 9.6 (±4.8) at 6 months and 5.9 (±1.8) versus 8.0 (±4.7) at 12 months. MBSImP pharyngeal scores demonstrated weak associations with several MDADI subscales and PAS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To best describe swallowing outcomes in studies of RT and/or surgery, instrumental swallowing assessments should be strongly considered in addition to quality of life measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27986\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Transoral Robotic Surgery Versus Radiation on Swallowing Function in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients: A Sub-Study From a Randomized Trial.
Background: This ORATOR sub-study evaluated swallowing physiology in patients treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) versus radiotherapy (RT) for early-stage oropharynx cancer.
Methods: Swallowing physiology was evaluated using videofluoroscopy and outcomes were compared across treatment arms and correlated with MDADI scores.
Results: Of the 68 patients in the ORATOR trial, 21 participated in this sub-study (30.8%), including 15 RT Arm and six TORS Arm patients. Swallowing profiles were not significantly different between the arms. MBSImP pharyngeal scores for RT Arm versus TORS Arm patients were 4.8 (±2.1) versus 4.3 (±1.5) at baseline, 6.2 (±1.2) versus 9.6 (±4.8) at 6 months and 5.9 (±1.8) versus 8.0 (±4.7) at 12 months. MBSImP pharyngeal scores demonstrated weak associations with several MDADI subscales and PAS scores.
Conclusions: To best describe swallowing outcomes in studies of RT and/or surgery, instrumental swallowing assessments should be strongly considered in addition to quality of life measures.
期刊介绍：
Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
