不同电刺激模型的动作电位阈值变化及其对职业接触限值的潜在影响。

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Florian Soyka, Thomas Tarnaud, Carsten Alteköster, Ruben Schoeters, Tom Plovie, Wout Joseph, Emmeric Tanghe
{"title":"不同电刺激模型的动作电位阈值变化及其对职业接触限值的潜在影响。","authors":"Florian Soyka, Thomas Tarnaud, Carsten Alteköster, Ruben Schoeters, Tom Plovie, Wout Joseph, Emmeric Tanghe","doi":"10.1002/bem.22529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Occupational exposure limit values (ELVs) for body internal electric fields can be derived from thresholds for action potential generation. These thresholds can be calculated with electrostimulation models. The spatially extended nonlinear node model (SENN) is often used to determine such thresholds. Important parameters of these models are the membrane channel dynamics describing the ionic transmembrane currents as well as the temperature at which the models operate. This work compares action potential thresholds for five different membrane channel dynamics used with the SENN model. Furthermore, two more detailed double-cable models by Gaines et al. (MRG-Sensory and MRG-Motor) are also considered in this work. Thresholds calculated with the SENN model and the MRG models are compared for frequencies between 1 Hz and 100 kHz and temperatures at 22°C and 37°C. Results show that MRG thresholds are lower than SENN thresholds. Deriving alternative ELVs from these thresholds shows that the alternative ELVs can change significantly with different ion channel dynamics (up to a factor of 22). Using the double cable model could lead to approximately ten times lower alternative exposure limit values. On the contrary, using the SENN model with different membrane channel dynamics could also lead to higher alternative exposure limit values. Therefore, future exposure guidelines should take the influence of different electrostimulation models into account when deriving ELVs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8956,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectromagnetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Action potential threshold variability for different electrostimulation models and its potential impact on occupational exposure limit values.\",\"authors\":\"Florian Soyka, Thomas Tarnaud, Carsten Alteköster, Ruben Schoeters, Tom Plovie, Wout Joseph, Emmeric Tanghe\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bem.22529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Occupational exposure limit values (ELVs) for body internal electric fields can be derived from thresholds for action potential generation. These thresholds can be calculated with electrostimulation models. The spatially extended nonlinear node model (SENN) is often used to determine such thresholds. Important parameters of these models are the membrane channel dynamics describing the ionic transmembrane currents as well as the temperature at which the models operate. This work compares action potential thresholds for five different membrane channel dynamics used with the SENN model. Furthermore, two more detailed double-cable models by Gaines et al. (MRG-Sensory and MRG-Motor) are also considered in this work. Thresholds calculated with the SENN model and the MRG models are compared for frequencies between 1 Hz and 100 kHz and temperatures at 22°C and 37°C. Results show that MRG thresholds are lower than SENN thresholds. Deriving alternative ELVs from these thresholds shows that the alternative ELVs can change significantly with different ion channel dynamics (up to a factor of 22). Using the double cable model could lead to approximately ten times lower alternative exposure limit values. On the contrary, using the SENN model with different membrane channel dynamics could also lead to higher alternative exposure limit values. Therefore, future exposure guidelines should take the influence of different electrostimulation models into account when deriving ELVs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioelectromagnetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioelectromagnetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22529\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectromagnetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22529","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人体内部电场的职业接触限值(ELV)可从动作电位产生的阈值中得出。这些阈值可通过电刺激模型计算得出。空间扩展非线性节点模型(SENN)通常用于确定此类阈值。这些模型的重要参数是描述离子跨膜电流的膜通道动力学以及模型运行的温度。这项研究比较了与 SENN 模型一起使用的五种不同膜通道动力学的动作电位阈值。此外,本研究还考虑了盖恩斯等人的两个更详细的双电缆模型(MRG-感觉和 MRG-运动)。在频率为 1 Hz 和 100 kHz 以及温度为 22°C 和 37°C 时,比较了 SENN 模型和 MRG 模型计算出的阈值。结果表明,MRG 阈值低于 SENN 阈值。从这些阈值推导出的替代 ELV 表明,替代 ELV 会随着离子通道动力学的不同而发生显著变化(最多变化 22 倍)。使用双电缆模型可使替代暴露限值降低约 10 倍。相反,使用具有不同膜通道动力学的 SENN 模型也会导致较高的替代暴露限值。因此,未来的暴露指南在推导 ELV 值时,应考虑到不同电刺激模型的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Action potential threshold variability for different electrostimulation models and its potential impact on occupational exposure limit values.

Occupational exposure limit values (ELVs) for body internal electric fields can be derived from thresholds for action potential generation. These thresholds can be calculated with electrostimulation models. The spatially extended nonlinear node model (SENN) is often used to determine such thresholds. Important parameters of these models are the membrane channel dynamics describing the ionic transmembrane currents as well as the temperature at which the models operate. This work compares action potential thresholds for five different membrane channel dynamics used with the SENN model. Furthermore, two more detailed double-cable models by Gaines et al. (MRG-Sensory and MRG-Motor) are also considered in this work. Thresholds calculated with the SENN model and the MRG models are compared for frequencies between 1 Hz and 100 kHz and temperatures at 22°C and 37°C. Results show that MRG thresholds are lower than SENN thresholds. Deriving alternative ELVs from these thresholds shows that the alternative ELVs can change significantly with different ion channel dynamics (up to a factor of 22). Using the double cable model could lead to approximately ten times lower alternative exposure limit values. On the contrary, using the SENN model with different membrane channel dynamics could also lead to higher alternative exposure limit values. Therefore, future exposure guidelines should take the influence of different electrostimulation models into account when deriving ELVs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioelectromagnetics
Bioelectromagnetics 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bioelectromagnetics is published by Wiley-Liss, Inc., for the Bioelectromagnetics Society and is the official journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society and the European Bioelectromagnetics Association. It is a peer-reviewed, internationally circulated scientific journal that specializes in reporting original data on biological effects and applications of electromagnetic fields that range in frequency from zero hertz (static fields) to the terahertz undulations and visible light. Both experimental and clinical data are of interest to the journal''s readers as are theoretical papers or reviews that offer novel insights into or criticism of contemporary concepts and theories of field-body interactions. The Bioelectromagnetics Society, which sponsors the journal, also welcomes experimental or clinical papers on the domains of sonic and ultrasonic radiation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信