对抗磷脂抗体阳性的高流产风险患者使用静脉注射免疫球蛋白:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PeerJ Pub Date : 2024-10-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.18419
Xin Yuan, Wei Zhang, Tong Wang, Peng Jiang, Zong-Kui Wang, Chang-Qing Li
{"title":"对抗磷脂抗体阳性的高流产风险患者使用静脉注射免疫球蛋白:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xin Yuan, Wei Zhang, Tong Wang, Peng Jiang, Zong-Kui Wang, Chang-Qing Li","doi":"10.7717/peerj.18419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) increases live birth rates and improves neonatal results in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) at high-risk for miscarriage.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Positivity of aPL in pregnant women is a high-risk factor for miscarriage, and IVIG treatment has emerged as a potential intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was employed to search multiple electronic databases for articles published until August 20, 2023, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Medline. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies assessing the efficacy of IVIG in aPL-positive patients with a high risk of miscarriage. Relevant articles were assessed for the quality and data were extracted for analysis. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessments. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. All analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review included nine randomized controlled trials, with 366 aPL-positive women at high risk of miscarriage. These studies included in this review were randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome measures were successful pregnancy outcomes and live birth rates. The secondary outcomes included obstetric complications, and neonatal outcomes (such as birth weight and live-birth rate). The comparison between the intervention and control groups revealed no significant differences in terms of obstetric complications and neonatal outcomes. The group receiving IVIG treatment had a higher prevalence of preterm deliveries than controls (OR = 2.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 46%, 95% CI [0.58-5.24]), but also exhibited a partial improvement in live birth rates (OR = 2.86, I<sup>2</sup> = 52%, 95% CI [1.04-7.90]), because it reduced the number of miscarriages (OR = 0.35, I<sup>2</sup> = 52%, 95% CI [0.13-0.96]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the available evidence, IVIG intervention appears to be a potentially effective approach for managing of aPL-positive pregnant women with high risk of miscarriage. While IVIG shows significant potential in tripling the chances of having a live-born child, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are necessary, preferably comparing IVIG with hydroxychloroquine or lifestyle and dietary interventions, to refine treatment protocols and ensure the most effective application.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of intravenous immunoglobulin in antiphospholipid antibody positive patients with high risk of miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Yuan, Wei Zhang, Tong Wang, Peng Jiang, Zong-Kui Wang, Chang-Qing Li\",\"doi\":\"10.7717/peerj.18419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) increases live birth rates and improves neonatal results in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) at high-risk for miscarriage.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Positivity of aPL in pregnant women is a high-risk factor for miscarriage, and IVIG treatment has emerged as a potential intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was employed to search multiple electronic databases for articles published until August 20, 2023, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Medline. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies assessing the efficacy of IVIG in aPL-positive patients with a high risk of miscarriage. Relevant articles were assessed for the quality and data were extracted for analysis. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessments. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. All analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review included nine randomized controlled trials, with 366 aPL-positive women at high risk of miscarriage. These studies included in this review were randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome measures were successful pregnancy outcomes and live birth rates. The secondary outcomes included obstetric complications, and neonatal outcomes (such as birth weight and live-birth rate). The comparison between the intervention and control groups revealed no significant differences in terms of obstetric complications and neonatal outcomes. The group receiving IVIG treatment had a higher prevalence of preterm deliveries than controls (OR = 2.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 46%, 95% CI [0.58-5.24]), but also exhibited a partial improvement in live birth rates (OR = 2.86, I<sup>2</sup> = 52%, 95% CI [1.04-7.90]), because it reduced the number of miscarriages (OR = 0.35, I<sup>2</sup> = 52%, 95% CI [0.13-0.96]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the available evidence, IVIG intervention appears to be a potentially effective approach for managing of aPL-positive pregnant women with high risk of miscarriage. While IVIG shows significant potential in tripling the chances of having a live-born child, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are necessary, preferably comparing IVIG with hydroxychloroquine or lifestyle and dietary interventions, to refine treatment protocols and ensure the most effective application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PeerJ\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531756/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PeerJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18419\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)是否能提高抗磷脂抗体(aPL)高风险流产患者的活产率并改善新生儿结果:背景:孕妇抗磷脂抗体阳性是流产的高危因素,IVIG 治疗已成为一种潜在的干预措施:方法:采用系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)指南,检索多个电子数据库中截至 2023 年 8 月 20 日发表的文章,包括 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus 和 Medline。纳入标准包括评估 IVIG 对高流产风险 aPL 阳性患者疗效的研究。对相关文章进行了质量评估,并提取数据进行分析。两名独立审稿人负责研究筛选、数据提取和质量评估。偏倚风险根据 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行评估。所有分析均使用 Review Manager 5.3 进行:本系统综述包括 9 项随机对照试验,共涉及 366 名 aPL 阳性的高流产风险妇女。这些研究均为随机对照试验。主要结果指标为成功妊娠率和活产率。次要结果包括产科并发症和新生儿结果(如出生体重和活产率)。干预组和对照组的比较显示,在产科并发症和新生儿预后方面没有显著差异。接受IVIG治疗组的早产率高于对照组(OR = 2.05,I2 = 46%,95% CI [0.58-5.24]),但由于减少了流产次数(OR = 0.35,I2 = 52%,95% CI [0.13-0.96]),活产率也有部分改善(OR = 2.86,I2 = 52%,95% CI [1.04-7.90]):根据现有证据,IVIG 干预似乎是一种管理 aPL 阳性高流产风险孕妇的潜在有效方法。虽然 IVIG 在提高活产几率三倍方面显示出巨大潜力,但仍有必要进一步开展大规模随机对照试验,最好将 IVIG 与羟氯喹或生活方式和饮食干预进行比较,以完善治疗方案并确保最有效的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of intravenous immunoglobulin in antiphospholipid antibody positive patients with high risk of miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) increases live birth rates and improves neonatal results in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) at high-risk for miscarriage.

Background: Positivity of aPL in pregnant women is a high-risk factor for miscarriage, and IVIG treatment has emerged as a potential intervention.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was employed to search multiple electronic databases for articles published until August 20, 2023, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Medline. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies assessing the efficacy of IVIG in aPL-positive patients with a high risk of miscarriage. Relevant articles were assessed for the quality and data were extracted for analysis. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessments. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. All analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3.

Results: This systematic review included nine randomized controlled trials, with 366 aPL-positive women at high risk of miscarriage. These studies included in this review were randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome measures were successful pregnancy outcomes and live birth rates. The secondary outcomes included obstetric complications, and neonatal outcomes (such as birth weight and live-birth rate). The comparison between the intervention and control groups revealed no significant differences in terms of obstetric complications and neonatal outcomes. The group receiving IVIG treatment had a higher prevalence of preterm deliveries than controls (OR = 2.05, I2 = 46%, 95% CI [0.58-5.24]), but also exhibited a partial improvement in live birth rates (OR = 2.86, I2 = 52%, 95% CI [1.04-7.90]), because it reduced the number of miscarriages (OR = 0.35, I2 = 52%, 95% CI [0.13-0.96]).

Conclusion: Based on the available evidence, IVIG intervention appears to be a potentially effective approach for managing of aPL-positive pregnant women with high risk of miscarriage. While IVIG shows significant potential in tripling the chances of having a live-born child, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are necessary, preferably comparing IVIG with hydroxychloroquine or lifestyle and dietary interventions, to refine treatment protocols and ensure the most effective application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信