软件驱动的慢性病管理:社区血压控制试点中的算法设计与实施。

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121241284025
Rahul C Deo, Rebecca Smith, Calum A MacRae, Esha Price, Horace Sheffield, Rahul Patel
{"title":"软件驱动的慢性病管理:社区血压控制试点中的算法设计与实施。","authors":"Rahul C Deo, Rebecca Smith, Calum A MacRae, Esha Price, Horace Sheffield, Rahul Patel","doi":"10.1177/20503121241284025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy is rarely attained in practice, resulting in inadequate control of diseases such as hypertension, with poorer results in under-resourced communities. Technology, including artificial intelligence-driven decision support and software-driven workflow transformation, can potentially improve disease outcomes at a reduced cost, although it must be integrated with a holistic approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe the design of a software platform that enables rapid iterative remote management of >20 conditions across cardiac-kidney-metabolic disease. The platform distributes work across a care team of providers and care navigators, automates decision-making, ordering, and documentation, supports rapid incorporation of new evidence, and launches pragmatic trials. We describe software used in a 500-person community-based blood pressure control implemented as a single-arm quality improvement program. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients meeting the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set quality measure blood pressure goal (<140/90) at 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1609 patients were screened, 945 (59%) were found to have uncontrolled hypertension, and 512 patients consented to join the program. The average age was 61 ± 11 years; 59% were female, and 99% self-identified as Black. Blood pressure distribution was: 10% Stage 1 (SBP 130-139 mmHg or DBP 80-89 mmHg), 69% Stage 2 (SBP 140-179 mmHg or DBP 90-119 mmHg), and 21% Stage 3 (SBP >180 mmHg or DBP >120 mmHg). Two hundred four patients (39%) proceeded to a provider encounter, and 160 of these (78%) completed the program. The Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set blood pressure goal was achieved in <12 weeks of enrollment for 141 participants (69% of those enrolled, 88% of those who completed the program).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Software-driven remote blood pressure is feasible, although strategies to improve patient enrollment will be needed to achieve maximum impact. Future work will be required to compare outcomes to usual care and evaluate concurrent management of multiple cardiac-kidney-metabolic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"20503121241284025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software-driven chronic disease management: Algorithm design and implementation in a community-based blood pressure control pilot.\",\"authors\":\"Rahul C Deo, Rebecca Smith, Calum A MacRae, Esha Price, Horace Sheffield, Rahul Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20503121241284025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy is rarely attained in practice, resulting in inadequate control of diseases such as hypertension, with poorer results in under-resourced communities. Technology, including artificial intelligence-driven decision support and software-driven workflow transformation, can potentially improve disease outcomes at a reduced cost, although it must be integrated with a holistic approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe the design of a software platform that enables rapid iterative remote management of >20 conditions across cardiac-kidney-metabolic disease. The platform distributes work across a care team of providers and care navigators, automates decision-making, ordering, and documentation, supports rapid incorporation of new evidence, and launches pragmatic trials. We describe software used in a 500-person community-based blood pressure control implemented as a single-arm quality improvement program. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients meeting the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set quality measure blood pressure goal (<140/90) at 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1609 patients were screened, 945 (59%) were found to have uncontrolled hypertension, and 512 patients consented to join the program. The average age was 61 ± 11 years; 59% were female, and 99% self-identified as Black. Blood pressure distribution was: 10% Stage 1 (SBP 130-139 mmHg or DBP 80-89 mmHg), 69% Stage 2 (SBP 140-179 mmHg or DBP 90-119 mmHg), and 21% Stage 3 (SBP >180 mmHg or DBP >120 mmHg). Two hundred four patients (39%) proceeded to a provider encounter, and 160 of these (78%) completed the program. The Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set blood pressure goal was achieved in <12 weeks of enrollment for 141 participants (69% of those enrolled, 88% of those who completed the program).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Software-driven remote blood pressure is feasible, although strategies to improve patient enrollment will be needed to achieve maximum impact. Future work will be required to compare outcomes to usual care and evaluate concurrent management of multiple cardiac-kidney-metabolic conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAGE Open Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"20503121241284025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530998/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAGE Open Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121241284025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121241284025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在实践中很少能达到最佳的指导性医疗治疗,导致高血压等疾病控制不力,在资源不足的社区效果更差。技术,包括人工智能驱动的决策支持和软件驱动的工作流程转换,有可能以较低的成本改善疾病治疗效果,但必须与整体方法相结合:方法:我们介绍了一个软件平台的设计,该平台可快速迭代远程管理 20 多种疾病,涵盖心脏、肾脏和代谢性疾病。该平台将工作分配给由医疗服务提供者和护理导航员组成的护理团队,实现决策、订购和记录自动化,支持快速纳入新证据,并启动实用性试验。我们介绍了在一个 500 人的社区血压控制项目中使用的软件,该项目是一项单臂质量改进计划。主要终点是达到医疗保健有效性数据和信息集质量测量血压目标的患者比例(结果:共有 1609 名患者接受了筛查,其中 945 人(59%)被发现患有未控制的高血压,512 名患者同意加入该计划。平均年龄为 61 ± 11 岁;59% 为女性,99% 自认为是黑人。血压分布为:10%为第一阶段(SBP 130-139 mmHg 或 DBP 80-89 mmHg),69%为第二阶段(SBP 140-179 mmHg 或 DBP 90-119 mmHg),21%为第三阶段(SBP >180 mmHg 或 DBP >120 mmHg)。244 名患者(39%)接受了医疗服务,其中 160 人(78%)完成了项目。结论:软件驱动的远程血压测量是可行的:软件驱动的远程血压是可行的,但需要采取策略提高患者注册率,以达到最大效果。未来的工作需要将结果与常规护理进行比较,并对同时管理多种心脏-肾脏-代谢疾病进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Software-driven chronic disease management: Algorithm design and implementation in a community-based blood pressure control pilot.

Background: Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy is rarely attained in practice, resulting in inadequate control of diseases such as hypertension, with poorer results in under-resourced communities. Technology, including artificial intelligence-driven decision support and software-driven workflow transformation, can potentially improve disease outcomes at a reduced cost, although it must be integrated with a holistic approach.

Methods: We describe the design of a software platform that enables rapid iterative remote management of >20 conditions across cardiac-kidney-metabolic disease. The platform distributes work across a care team of providers and care navigators, automates decision-making, ordering, and documentation, supports rapid incorporation of new evidence, and launches pragmatic trials. We describe software used in a 500-person community-based blood pressure control implemented as a single-arm quality improvement program. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients meeting the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set quality measure blood pressure goal (<140/90) at 12 weeks.

Results: A total of 1609 patients were screened, 945 (59%) were found to have uncontrolled hypertension, and 512 patients consented to join the program. The average age was 61 ± 11 years; 59% were female, and 99% self-identified as Black. Blood pressure distribution was: 10% Stage 1 (SBP 130-139 mmHg or DBP 80-89 mmHg), 69% Stage 2 (SBP 140-179 mmHg or DBP 90-119 mmHg), and 21% Stage 3 (SBP >180 mmHg or DBP >120 mmHg). Two hundred four patients (39%) proceeded to a provider encounter, and 160 of these (78%) completed the program. The Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set blood pressure goal was achieved in <12 weeks of enrollment for 141 participants (69% of those enrolled, 88% of those who completed the program).

Conclusion: Software-driven remote blood pressure is feasible, although strategies to improve patient enrollment will be needed to achieve maximum impact. Future work will be required to compare outcomes to usual care and evaluate concurrent management of multiple cardiac-kidney-metabolic conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信