{"title":"从总肺活量推算被动呼气量可估测婴儿的呼气功能:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Avigdor Hevroni, Yael Simpson Lavy, Laurice Boursheh, Ephraim Bar-Yishay","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluating expiratory airway function in infants is challenging because the criterion standard, the raised-volume rapid thoracoabdominal compression technique, is technically difficult and has a high failure rate.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Are measurements obtained during passive expiration from total lung capacity correlated with forced expiration measurements obtained by the raised-volume technique in infants?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This observational retrospective analysis included infants born ≥ 36 weeks' gestation who underwent pulmonary function testing using the raised-volume rapid thoracoabdominal compression technique at Hadassah Medical Centre between January 2011 and December 2019. Technically acceptable forced and passive flow-volume curve measurements were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 296 eligible infants, 276 (93%) had technically acceptable passive flow-volume curves, whereas 226 (76%) had acceptable forced curves (P < .001). The success rate of producing an acceptable curve was 70% for the passive curves and 39% for forced curves (P < .001). The Spearman correlation coefficients of vital capacity, expiratory volume at 0.5 seconds, maximal expiratory flow, and expiratory flow at 50%, 75%, and 85% of vital capacity were 0.92, 0.72, 0.83, 0.66, 0.67, and 0.68, respectively (n = 226; P < .001 for all). The correlation remained high regardless of the level of expiratory airway obstruction, sex, or age. The mean intermaneuver coefficients of variation were fairly low for both methods (5.2% vs 5.4%, P = not significant).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The passive flow-volume curve offers reliable and reproducible data with high correlation to the forced flow-volume curve. Therefore, the passive flow-volume curve can serve as an alternative tool in evaluating expiratory airway function in infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Passive Expiration From Total Lung Capacity Can Estimate Expiratory Function in Infants A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Avigdor Hevroni, Yael Simpson Lavy, Laurice Boursheh, Ephraim Bar-Yishay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluating expiratory airway function in infants is challenging because the criterion standard, the raised-volume rapid thoracoabdominal compression technique, is technically difficult and has a high failure rate.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Are measurements obtained during passive expiration from total lung capacity correlated with forced expiration measurements obtained by the raised-volume technique in infants?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This observational retrospective analysis included infants born ≥ 36 weeks' gestation who underwent pulmonary function testing using the raised-volume rapid thoracoabdominal compression technique at Hadassah Medical Centre between January 2011 and December 2019. Technically acceptable forced and passive flow-volume curve measurements were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 296 eligible infants, 276 (93%) had technically acceptable passive flow-volume curves, whereas 226 (76%) had acceptable forced curves (P < .001). The success rate of producing an acceptable curve was 70% for the passive curves and 39% for forced curves (P < .001). The Spearman correlation coefficients of vital capacity, expiratory volume at 0.5 seconds, maximal expiratory flow, and expiratory flow at 50%, 75%, and 85% of vital capacity were 0.92, 0.72, 0.83, 0.66, 0.67, and 0.68, respectively (n = 226; P < .001 for all). The correlation remained high regardless of the level of expiratory airway obstruction, sex, or age. The mean intermaneuver coefficients of variation were fairly low for both methods (5.2% vs 5.4%, P = not significant).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The passive flow-volume curve offers reliable and reproducible data with high correlation to the forced flow-volume curve. Therefore, the passive flow-volume curve can serve as an alternative tool in evaluating expiratory airway function in infants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.026\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Passive Expiration From Total Lung Capacity Can Estimate Expiratory Function in Infants A Retrospective Study.
Background: Evaluating expiratory airway function in infants is challenging because the criterion standard, the raised-volume rapid thoracoabdominal compression technique, is technically difficult and has a high failure rate.
Research question: Are measurements obtained during passive expiration from total lung capacity correlated with forced expiration measurements obtained by the raised-volume technique in infants?
Study design and methods: This observational retrospective analysis included infants born ≥ 36 weeks' gestation who underwent pulmonary function testing using the raised-volume rapid thoracoabdominal compression technique at Hadassah Medical Centre between January 2011 and December 2019. Technically acceptable forced and passive flow-volume curve measurements were included in the analysis.
Results: Out of 296 eligible infants, 276 (93%) had technically acceptable passive flow-volume curves, whereas 226 (76%) had acceptable forced curves (P < .001). The success rate of producing an acceptable curve was 70% for the passive curves and 39% for forced curves (P < .001). The Spearman correlation coefficients of vital capacity, expiratory volume at 0.5 seconds, maximal expiratory flow, and expiratory flow at 50%, 75%, and 85% of vital capacity were 0.92, 0.72, 0.83, 0.66, 0.67, and 0.68, respectively (n = 226; P < .001 for all). The correlation remained high regardless of the level of expiratory airway obstruction, sex, or age. The mean intermaneuver coefficients of variation were fairly low for both methods (5.2% vs 5.4%, P = not significant).
Interpretation: The passive flow-volume curve offers reliable and reproducible data with high correlation to the forced flow-volume curve. Therefore, the passive flow-volume curve can serve as an alternative tool in evaluating expiratory airway function in infants.
期刊介绍:
At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.