Johannes Zeilinger, Martin Kronschläger, Andreas Schlatter, Stefan Georgiev, Manuel Ruiss, Caroline Pilwachs, Oliver Findl
{"title":"使用迷你单焦法比较先进单焦与非衍射性延伸焦深眼内透镜：比较先进的微型单焦点眼内透镜。","authors":"Johannes Zeilinger, Martin Kronschläger, Andreas Schlatter, Stefan Georgiev, Manuel Ruiss, Caroline Pilwachs, Oliver Findl","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare interindividual differences in visual performance of an advanced monofocal with a nondiffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens (IOL) using a mini-monovision approach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, randomized, controlled, double-masked study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 48 patients (96 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract were enrolled. One group received an advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E (RayOne EMV; Rayner) and the other group a non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015 (Acrysof IQ Vivity; Alcon) in both eyes. Target refraction for both groups was mini-monovision. After 3 months, monocular and binocular distance corrected and uncorrected distance (CDVA/UDVA), intermediate (DCIVA/UIVA), and near visual acuity (DCNVA/UNVA); contrast sensitivity; binocular defocus curves; halometry; and Quality of Vision questionnaire scores were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Binocular mean CDVA, DCIVA at 66 cm, and DCNVA at 40 cm were -0.10±0.10, 0.15±0.11, and 0.32±0.16 logMAR for the RAO200E and -0.10±0.10, 0.12±0.10, and 0.27±0.16 logMAR for the DFT015, respectively, with no significant difference. A significant difference could be shown for the dominant eye in monocular DCIVA and DCNVA and for the dominant and nondominant eye in monocular UNVA, with 0.28±0.14, 0.48±0.22, 0.46±0.21, and 0.41±0.20 logMAR for the RAO200E and 0.14±0.10 (P = .023), 0.35±0.16 (P = .008), 0.30±0.14 (P = .001), and 0.21±0.10 (P = .003) logMAR for the DFT015, respectively. Significantly smaller halo size in the RAO200E group and significantly better distance-corrected defocus curve at -2.5 (P = .031), -2.0 (P = .03), and -1 diopters (P = .03) of defocus in the DFT015 group could be shown.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Distance corrected or uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far, intermediate, and near distance between the advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E and the non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015, when compared in a mini-monovision setting, showed no significant differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"86-95"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing an Advanced Monofocal With a Non-diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Using a Mini-Monovision Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Zeilinger, Martin Kronschläger, Andreas Schlatter, Stefan Georgiev, Manuel Ruiss, Caroline Pilwachs, Oliver Findl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajo.2024.10.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare interindividual differences in visual performance of an advanced monofocal with a nondiffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens (IOL) using a mini-monovision approach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, randomized, controlled, double-masked study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 48 patients (96 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract were enrolled. One group received an advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E (RayOne EMV; Rayner) and the other group a non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015 (Acrysof IQ Vivity; Alcon) in both eyes. Target refraction for both groups was mini-monovision. After 3 months, monocular and binocular distance corrected and uncorrected distance (CDVA/UDVA), intermediate (DCIVA/UIVA), and near visual acuity (DCNVA/UNVA); contrast sensitivity; binocular defocus curves; halometry; and Quality of Vision questionnaire scores were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Binocular mean CDVA, DCIVA at 66 cm, and DCNVA at 40 cm were -0.10±0.10, 0.15±0.11, and 0.32±0.16 logMAR for the RAO200E and -0.10±0.10, 0.12±0.10, and 0.27±0.16 logMAR for the DFT015, respectively, with no significant difference. A significant difference could be shown for the dominant eye in monocular DCIVA and DCNVA and for the dominant and nondominant eye in monocular UNVA, with 0.28±0.14, 0.48±0.22, 0.46±0.21, and 0.41±0.20 logMAR for the RAO200E and 0.14±0.10 (P = .023), 0.35±0.16 (P = .008), 0.30±0.14 (P = .001), and 0.21±0.10 (P = .003) logMAR for the DFT015, respectively. Significantly smaller halo size in the RAO200E group and significantly better distance-corrected defocus curve at -2.5 (P = .031), -2.0 (P = .03), and -1 diopters (P = .03) of defocus in the DFT015 group could be shown.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Distance corrected or uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far, intermediate, and near distance between the advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E and the non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015, when compared in a mini-monovision setting, showed no significant differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"86-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.10.014\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.10.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing an Advanced Monofocal With a Non-diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Using a Mini-Monovision Approach.
Purpose: To compare interindividual differences in visual performance of an advanced monofocal with a nondiffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens (IOL) using a mini-monovision approach.
Methods: In total, 48 patients (96 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract were enrolled. One group received an advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E (RayOne EMV; Rayner) and the other group a non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015 (Acrysof IQ Vivity; Alcon) in both eyes. Target refraction for both groups was mini-monovision. After 3 months, monocular and binocular distance corrected and uncorrected distance (CDVA/UDVA), intermediate (DCIVA/UIVA), and near visual acuity (DCNVA/UNVA); contrast sensitivity; binocular defocus curves; halometry; and Quality of Vision questionnaire scores were compared.
Results: Binocular mean CDVA, DCIVA at 66 cm, and DCNVA at 40 cm were -0.10±0.10, 0.15±0.11, and 0.32±0.16 logMAR for the RAO200E and -0.10±0.10, 0.12±0.10, and 0.27±0.16 logMAR for the DFT015, respectively, with no significant difference. A significant difference could be shown for the dominant eye in monocular DCIVA and DCNVA and for the dominant and nondominant eye in monocular UNVA, with 0.28±0.14, 0.48±0.22, 0.46±0.21, and 0.41±0.20 logMAR for the RAO200E and 0.14±0.10 (P = .023), 0.35±0.16 (P = .008), 0.30±0.14 (P = .001), and 0.21±0.10 (P = .003) logMAR for the DFT015, respectively. Significantly smaller halo size in the RAO200E group and significantly better distance-corrected defocus curve at -2.5 (P = .031), -2.0 (P = .03), and -1 diopters (P = .03) of defocus in the DFT015 group could be shown.
Conclusions: Distance corrected or uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far, intermediate, and near distance between the advanced monofocal IOL RAO200E and the non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL DFT015, when compared in a mini-monovision setting, showed no significant differences.
期刊介绍：
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
