分析推人行为和单侧空间忽略的恢复过程和日常生活独立性。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Yuichi Kato, Yu Sato, Takumi Orimoto, Yuto Sudo, Masafumi Suzuki, Shigeyasu Ishida, Tokihide Jyashiki, Masanari Kikura, Yumi Ikeda, Kazu Amimoto
{"title":"分析推人行为和单侧空间忽略的恢复过程和日常生活独立性。","authors":"Yuichi Kato, Yu Sato, Takumi Orimoto, Yuto Sudo, Masafumi Suzuki, Shigeyasu Ishida, Tokihide Jyashiki, Masanari Kikura, Yumi Ikeda, Kazu Amimoto","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the recovery processes of pusher behavior (PB) and unilateral spatial neglect (USN) based on the severity of PB and USN, and to determine the relationship between activities of daily living (ADL) independence levels.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to examine the temporal changes and their association with ADL independence levels based on the severity of PB and USN.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Recovery ward of Moriyama Neurological Center Hospital between March 2017 and October 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We included all patients with cerebrovascular disease admitted to the recovery ward of Moriyama Neurological Center Hospital between March 2017 and October 2022. A total of 174 patients with PB and USN were classified into 4 groups as follows: severe PB and severe USN (Group A), severe PB and mild USN (Group B), mild PB and severe USN (Group C), and mild PB and mild USN (Group D).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine whether the time to recovery from PB or USN (SCP: ≤1.75 points; Catherine Bergego Scale: 0 points) differed between groups. In addition, group differences in functional independence measure (FIM) scores and efficiencies were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences among Groups A and B, and Groups A and C, as determined by the log-rank test (P<.05), and recovery was prolonged when both PB and USN were severely impaired. Similarly, FIM scores and efficiencies were lower in Group A (P<.05). When PB and USN were severely impaired, ADL was adversely affected, and the recovery process was prolonged. In addition, when 1 of the 2 symptoms was severe and the other was mild, each recovery course tended to show improvement, suggesting that they exerted a mutual influence on each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that severity classification may help to determine functional prognosis in patients with PB and USN.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Recovery Process and Activities of Daily Living Independence in Pusher Behavior and Unilateral Spatial Neglect.\",\"authors\":\"Yuichi Kato, Yu Sato, Takumi Orimoto, Yuto Sudo, Masafumi Suzuki, Shigeyasu Ishida, Tokihide Jyashiki, Masanari Kikura, Yumi Ikeda, Kazu Amimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the recovery processes of pusher behavior (PB) and unilateral spatial neglect (USN) based on the severity of PB and USN, and to determine the relationship between activities of daily living (ADL) independence levels.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to examine the temporal changes and their association with ADL independence levels based on the severity of PB and USN.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Recovery ward of Moriyama Neurological Center Hospital between March 2017 and October 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We included all patients with cerebrovascular disease admitted to the recovery ward of Moriyama Neurological Center Hospital between March 2017 and October 2022. A total of 174 patients with PB and USN were classified into 4 groups as follows: severe PB and severe USN (Group A), severe PB and mild USN (Group B), mild PB and severe USN (Group C), and mild PB and mild USN (Group D).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine whether the time to recovery from PB or USN (SCP: ≤1.75 points; Catherine Bergego Scale: 0 points) differed between groups. In addition, group differences in functional independence measure (FIM) scores and efficiencies were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences among Groups A and B, and Groups A and C, as determined by the log-rank test (P<.05), and recovery was prolonged when both PB and USN were severely impaired. Similarly, FIM scores and efficiencies were lower in Group A (P<.05). When PB and USN were severely impaired, ADL was adversely affected, and the recovery process was prolonged. In addition, when 1 of the 2 symptoms was severe and the other was mild, each recovery course tended to show improvement, suggesting that they exerted a mutual influence on each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that severity classification may help to determine functional prognosis in patients with PB and USN.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.09.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的根据推拿行为(PB)和单侧空间忽略(USN)的严重程度,研究推拿行为(PB)和单侧空间忽略(USN)的恢复过程,确定其与日常生活活动(ADL)独立性水平之间的关系:这项回顾性研究旨在根据PB和USN的严重程度,研究其时间变化及其与ADL独立性水平之间的关系:2017年3月至2022年10月期间的森山神经中心医院康复病房:我们纳入了2017年3月至2022年10月期间入住森山神经中心医院康复病房的所有脑血管疾病患者。共174名PB和USN患者被分为以下四组:重度PB和重度USN(A组)、重度PB和轻度USN(B组)、轻度PB和重度USN(C组)、轻度PB和轻度USN(D组):主要结果测量采用卡普兰-米尔生存分析法确定 PB 或 USN(SCP:≤1.75 分;CBS:0 分)恢复时间在组间是否存在差异。此外,还研究了功能独立性测量(FIM)得分和效率的组间差异:结果:根据对数秩检验(PConclusions),A 组和 B 组之间以及 A 组和 C 组之间存在明显差异:这些研究结果表明,严重程度分类可能有助于确定 PB 和 USN 患者的功能预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the Recovery Process and Activities of Daily Living Independence in Pusher Behavior and Unilateral Spatial Neglect.

Objective: To investigate the recovery processes of pusher behavior (PB) and unilateral spatial neglect (USN) based on the severity of PB and USN, and to determine the relationship between activities of daily living (ADL) independence levels.

Design: This retrospective study aimed to examine the temporal changes and their association with ADL independence levels based on the severity of PB and USN.

Setting: Recovery ward of Moriyama Neurological Center Hospital between March 2017 and October 2022.

Participants: We included all patients with cerebrovascular disease admitted to the recovery ward of Moriyama Neurological Center Hospital between March 2017 and October 2022. A total of 174 patients with PB and USN were classified into 4 groups as follows: severe PB and severe USN (Group A), severe PB and mild USN (Group B), mild PB and severe USN (Group C), and mild PB and mild USN (Group D).

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine whether the time to recovery from PB or USN (SCP: ≤1.75 points; Catherine Bergego Scale: 0 points) differed between groups. In addition, group differences in functional independence measure (FIM) scores and efficiencies were examined.

Results: There were significant differences among Groups A and B, and Groups A and C, as determined by the log-rank test (P<.05), and recovery was prolonged when both PB and USN were severely impaired. Similarly, FIM scores and efficiencies were lower in Group A (P<.05). When PB and USN were severely impaired, ADL was adversely affected, and the recovery process was prolonged. In addition, when 1 of the 2 symptoms was severe and the other was mild, each recovery course tended to show improvement, suggesting that they exerted a mutual influence on each other.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that severity classification may help to determine functional prognosis in patients with PB and USN.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信