成骨细胞在 DNA 聚电解质多层涂层表面的抗表皮葡萄球菌竞赛中获胜,但在抗金黄色葡萄球菌竞赛中却没有获胜。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 BIOPHYSICS
Carmelo Covato, Alina Pilipenco, Andrea Scheberl, Erik Reimhult, Guruprakash Subbiahdoss
{"title":"成骨细胞在 DNA 聚电解质多层涂层表面的抗表皮葡萄球菌竞赛中获胜,但在抗金黄色葡萄球菌竞赛中却没有获胜。","authors":"Carmelo Covato, Alina Pilipenco, Andrea Scheberl, Erik Reimhult, Guruprakash Subbiahdoss","doi":"10.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.114336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biomaterial-associated infections pose severe challenges in modern medicine. Previously, we reported that polyanionic DNA surface coatings repel bacterial adhesion and support osteoblast-like cell attachment in monoculture experiments, candidate for orthopaedic implant coatings. However, monocultures lack the influence of bacteria or bacterial toxins on osteoblast-like cell adhesion to biomaterial surfaces. In this study, co-culture of staphylococcus (S. epidermidis and S. aureus) and SaOS-2 osteosarcoma cells was studied on chitosan-DNA polyelectrolyte multilayer coated glass based on the concept of `the race for the surface`. Staphylococcus was first deposited onto the surface in a microfluidic chamber to mimic peri-operative contamination, and subsequently, SaOS-2 cells were seeded. Both staphylococcus and SaOS-2 cells were cultured together on the surfaces for 24 h under flow. The presence of S. epidermidis decreased SaOS-2 cell number on all surfaces after 24 h. However, the cells that adhered spread equally well in the presence of low virulent S. epidermidis. However, highly virulent S. aureus induced cell death of all adherent SaOS-2 cells on chitosan-DNA multilayer coated glass, a worse outcome than on uncoated glass. The outcome of our co-culture study highlights the limitations of monoculture models. It demonstrates the need for in vitro co-culture assays to meaningfully bridge the gap in lab testing of biomaterials and their clinical evaluations where bacterial infection can occur. The relative failure of cell-adhesive and bacteria-repelling DNA coatings in co-cultures also suggests the need to incorporate bactericidal in addition to non-adhesive functions to protect competitive cell spreading over a long period.</p>","PeriodicalId":279,"journal":{"name":"Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces","volume":"245 ","pages":"114336"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteoblasts win the race for the surface on DNA polyelectrolyte multilayer coatings against S. epidermidis but not against S. aureus.\",\"authors\":\"Carmelo Covato, Alina Pilipenco, Andrea Scheberl, Erik Reimhult, Guruprakash Subbiahdoss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.114336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Biomaterial-associated infections pose severe challenges in modern medicine. Previously, we reported that polyanionic DNA surface coatings repel bacterial adhesion and support osteoblast-like cell attachment in monoculture experiments, candidate for orthopaedic implant coatings. However, monocultures lack the influence of bacteria or bacterial toxins on osteoblast-like cell adhesion to biomaterial surfaces. In this study, co-culture of staphylococcus (S. epidermidis and S. aureus) and SaOS-2 osteosarcoma cells was studied on chitosan-DNA polyelectrolyte multilayer coated glass based on the concept of `the race for the surface`. Staphylococcus was first deposited onto the surface in a microfluidic chamber to mimic peri-operative contamination, and subsequently, SaOS-2 cells were seeded. Both staphylococcus and SaOS-2 cells were cultured together on the surfaces for 24 h under flow. The presence of S. epidermidis decreased SaOS-2 cell number on all surfaces after 24 h. However, the cells that adhered spread equally well in the presence of low virulent S. epidermidis. However, highly virulent S. aureus induced cell death of all adherent SaOS-2 cells on chitosan-DNA multilayer coated glass, a worse outcome than on uncoated glass. The outcome of our co-culture study highlights the limitations of monoculture models. It demonstrates the need for in vitro co-culture assays to meaningfully bridge the gap in lab testing of biomaterials and their clinical evaluations where bacterial infection can occur. The relative failure of cell-adhesive and bacteria-repelling DNA coatings in co-cultures also suggests the need to incorporate bactericidal in addition to non-adhesive functions to protect competitive cell spreading over a long period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces\",\"volume\":\"245 \",\"pages\":\"114336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.114336\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.114336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物材料相关感染给现代医学带来了严峻挑战。此前,我们曾报道过,在单培养实验中,聚阴离子 DNA 表面涂层可驱除细菌粘附并支持成骨细胞样细胞附着,是骨科植入物涂层的候选材料。然而,单培养物缺乏细菌或细菌毒素对类成骨细胞粘附到生物材料表面的影响。本研究基于 "表面竞赛 "的概念,研究了葡萄球菌(表皮葡萄球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌)和 SaOS-2 骨肉瘤细胞在壳聚糖-DNA 聚电解质多层镀膜玻璃上的共培养。首先在微流体室中将葡萄球菌沉积到玻璃表面,以模拟围手术期污染,然后播种 SaOS-2 细胞。葡萄球菌和 SaOS-2 细胞一起在表面流动培养 24 小时。24 小时后,表皮葡萄球菌的存在减少了所有表面上的 SaOS-2 细胞数量。然而,在低毒性表皮葡萄球菌存在的情况下,粘附的细胞同样能很好地扩散。然而,高毒力金黄色葡萄球菌会导致壳聚糖-DNA 多层镀膜玻璃上所有附着的 SaOS-2 细胞死亡,比未镀膜玻璃上的结果更差。我们的共培养研究结果凸显了单培养模型的局限性。它表明需要进行体外共培养试验,以便在生物材料的实验室测试和临床评估之间架起一座桥梁,因为在临床评估中可能会发生细菌感染。共培养中细胞粘附和细菌排斥 DNA 涂层的相对失败也表明,除了非粘附功能外,还需要加入杀菌功能,以保护竞争性细胞长期扩散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Osteoblasts win the race for the surface on DNA polyelectrolyte multilayer coatings against S. epidermidis but not against S. aureus.

Biomaterial-associated infections pose severe challenges in modern medicine. Previously, we reported that polyanionic DNA surface coatings repel bacterial adhesion and support osteoblast-like cell attachment in monoculture experiments, candidate for orthopaedic implant coatings. However, monocultures lack the influence of bacteria or bacterial toxins on osteoblast-like cell adhesion to biomaterial surfaces. In this study, co-culture of staphylococcus (S. epidermidis and S. aureus) and SaOS-2 osteosarcoma cells was studied on chitosan-DNA polyelectrolyte multilayer coated glass based on the concept of `the race for the surface`. Staphylococcus was first deposited onto the surface in a microfluidic chamber to mimic peri-operative contamination, and subsequently, SaOS-2 cells were seeded. Both staphylococcus and SaOS-2 cells were cultured together on the surfaces for 24 h under flow. The presence of S. epidermidis decreased SaOS-2 cell number on all surfaces after 24 h. However, the cells that adhered spread equally well in the presence of low virulent S. epidermidis. However, highly virulent S. aureus induced cell death of all adherent SaOS-2 cells on chitosan-DNA multilayer coated glass, a worse outcome than on uncoated glass. The outcome of our co-culture study highlights the limitations of monoculture models. It demonstrates the need for in vitro co-culture assays to meaningfully bridge the gap in lab testing of biomaterials and their clinical evaluations where bacterial infection can occur. The relative failure of cell-adhesive and bacteria-repelling DNA coatings in co-cultures also suggests the need to incorporate bactericidal in addition to non-adhesive functions to protect competitive cell spreading over a long period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 生物-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research on colloid and interfacial phenomena in relation to systems of biological origin, having particular relevance to the medical, pharmaceutical, biotechnological, food and cosmetic fields. Submissions that: (1) deal solely with biological phenomena and do not describe the physico-chemical or colloid-chemical background and/or mechanism of the phenomena, and (2) deal solely with colloid/interfacial phenomena and do not have appropriate biological content or relevance, are outside the scope of the journal and will not be considered for publication. The journal publishes regular research papers, reviews, short communications and invited perspective articles, called BioInterface Perspectives. The BioInterface Perspective provide researchers the opportunity to review their own work, as well as provide insight into the work of others that inspired and influenced the author. Regular articles should have a maximum total length of 6,000 words. In addition, a (combined) maximum of 8 normal-sized figures and/or tables is allowed (so for instance 3 tables and 5 figures). For multiple-panel figures each set of two panels equates to one figure. Short communications should not exceed half of the above. It is required to give on the article cover page a short statistical summary of the article listing the total number of words and tables/figures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信