先心病患者的严重脑外伤疗效。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Justin N. Passman , Nathaniel A. Cleri , Jermaine Robertson , Jordan R. Saadon , Claire Polizu , Xuwen Zheng , Vaibhav Vagal , Sima Mofakham , Charles B. Mikell
{"title":"先心病患者的严重脑外伤疗效。","authors":"Justin N. Passman ,&nbsp;Nathaniel A. Cleri ,&nbsp;Jermaine Robertson ,&nbsp;Jordan R. Saadon ,&nbsp;Claire Polizu ,&nbsp;Xuwen Zheng ,&nbsp;Vaibhav Vagal ,&nbsp;Sima Mofakham ,&nbsp;Charles B. Mikell","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Individuals with psychiatric illnesses (PIs) have increased rates of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Nonetheless, the influence of underlying PI on TBI outcomes is poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed the medical records of 633 adult-severe TBI patients admitted to our institution between 2010 and 2021. We identified patients with premorbid PI (Psych (+) group, n = 129) and a subset with only a substance use disorder (SUD (+) group, n = 60) and compared them to patients without PI (Psych (−) group, n = 480). Outcome measures included discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), length of stay, in-hospital survival, and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Psych (+) group had increased in-hospital survival (69.8% vs. 55.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.003) and fewer patients with severe (3–8) discharge-GCS (28.7% vs. 46.0%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The SUD (+) group had increased in-hospital survival (70.0% vs. 55.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.028) and fewer patients with severe discharge-GCS (28.3% vs. 46.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.009). However, the Psych (+) (21.0 vs. 10.0 days, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and SUD (+) (16.0 v. 10.0 days, <em>P</em> = 0.011) groups had longer length of stay. The Psych (+) group had a higher mean GOS-E at discharge (2.7 vs. 2.4, <em>P</em> = 0.004), 6-months (3.8 vs. 3.0, <em>P</em> = 0.006) and 1-year (3.4 vs. 2.3, <em>P</em> = 0.027). The SUD (+) group also had a higher mean GOS-E at discharge (2.8 vs. 2.4, <em>P</em> = 0.034), six months (3.8 vs. 3.0, <em>P</em> = 0.035), and one year (3.5 vs. 2.3, <em>P</em> = 0.008). Additionally, there were no significant differences in injury severity or computed tomography scan findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Individuals with PI and SUD appeared to have better outcomes but more complicated hospital stays following severe TBI. Future studies should investigate the mechanisms underlying these outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 123367"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Outcomes in Patients with Premorbid Psychiatric Illness\",\"authors\":\"Justin N. Passman ,&nbsp;Nathaniel A. Cleri ,&nbsp;Jermaine Robertson ,&nbsp;Jordan R. Saadon ,&nbsp;Claire Polizu ,&nbsp;Xuwen Zheng ,&nbsp;Vaibhav Vagal ,&nbsp;Sima Mofakham ,&nbsp;Charles B. Mikell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Individuals with psychiatric illnesses (PIs) have increased rates of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Nonetheless, the influence of underlying PI on TBI outcomes is poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed the medical records of 633 adult-severe TBI patients admitted to our institution between 2010 and 2021. We identified patients with premorbid PI (Psych (+) group, n = 129) and a subset with only a substance use disorder (SUD (+) group, n = 60) and compared them to patients without PI (Psych (−) group, n = 480). Outcome measures included discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), length of stay, in-hospital survival, and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Psych (+) group had increased in-hospital survival (69.8% vs. 55.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.003) and fewer patients with severe (3–8) discharge-GCS (28.7% vs. 46.0%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The SUD (+) group had increased in-hospital survival (70.0% vs. 55.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.028) and fewer patients with severe discharge-GCS (28.3% vs. 46.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.009). However, the Psych (+) (21.0 vs. 10.0 days, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and SUD (+) (16.0 v. 10.0 days, <em>P</em> = 0.011) groups had longer length of stay. The Psych (+) group had a higher mean GOS-E at discharge (2.7 vs. 2.4, <em>P</em> = 0.004), 6-months (3.8 vs. 3.0, <em>P</em> = 0.006) and 1-year (3.4 vs. 2.3, <em>P</em> = 0.027). The SUD (+) group also had a higher mean GOS-E at discharge (2.8 vs. 2.4, <em>P</em> = 0.034), six months (3.8 vs. 3.0, <em>P</em> = 0.035), and one year (3.5 vs. 2.3, <em>P</em> = 0.008). Additionally, there were no significant differences in injury severity or computed tomography scan findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Individuals with PI and SUD appeared to have better outcomes but more complicated hospital stays following severe TBI. Future studies should investigate the mechanisms underlying these outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187887502401800X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187887502401800X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:患有精神疾病(PI)的人发生创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的几率更高。然而,人们对潜在精神疾病对创伤性脑损伤结果的影响知之甚少:我们分析了本院在 2010-2021 年间收治的 633 名成年重度 TBI(sTBI)患者的病历。我们确定了有病前 PI 的患者(Psych(+)组,n=129)和仅有药物使用障碍的患者(SUD(+)组,n=60),并将他们与无 PI 的患者(Psych(-)组,n=480)进行了比较。结果测量包括出院时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、住院时间(LOS)、院内存活率和格拉斯哥结果量表扩展版(GOS-E):结果:Psych(+)组的院内存活率更高(69.8% 对 55.0%,P=0.003),出院 GCS 重度(3-8)患者更少(28.7% 对 46.0%,P=0.003):有 PI 和 SUD 的患者在 sTBI 后似乎有更好的预后,但住院时间更长。未来的研究应调查这些结果的内在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Outcomes in Patients with Premorbid Psychiatric Illness

Objective

Individuals with psychiatric illnesses (PIs) have increased rates of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Nonetheless, the influence of underlying PI on TBI outcomes is poorly understood.

Methods

We analyzed the medical records of 633 adult-severe TBI patients admitted to our institution between 2010 and 2021. We identified patients with premorbid PI (Psych (+) group, n = 129) and a subset with only a substance use disorder (SUD (+) group, n = 60) and compared them to patients without PI (Psych (−) group, n = 480). Outcome measures included discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), length of stay, in-hospital survival, and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E).

Results

The Psych (+) group had increased in-hospital survival (69.8% vs. 55.0%, P = 0.003) and fewer patients with severe (3–8) discharge-GCS (28.7% vs. 46.0%, P < 0.001). The SUD (+) group had increased in-hospital survival (70.0% vs. 55.0%, P = 0.028) and fewer patients with severe discharge-GCS (28.3% vs. 46.0%, P = 0.009). However, the Psych (+) (21.0 vs. 10.0 days, P < 0.001) and SUD (+) (16.0 v. 10.0 days, P = 0.011) groups had longer length of stay. The Psych (+) group had a higher mean GOS-E at discharge (2.7 vs. 2.4, P = 0.004), 6-months (3.8 vs. 3.0, P = 0.006) and 1-year (3.4 vs. 2.3, P = 0.027). The SUD (+) group also had a higher mean GOS-E at discharge (2.8 vs. 2.4, P = 0.034), six months (3.8 vs. 3.0, P = 0.035), and one year (3.5 vs. 2.3, P = 0.008). Additionally, there were no significant differences in injury severity or computed tomography scan findings.

Conclusions

Individuals with PI and SUD appeared to have better outcomes but more complicated hospital stays following severe TBI. Future studies should investigate the mechanisms underlying these outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信