Lin Wang, Jonathan Weber, Jason Craft, Michael Passick, Omar K Khalique, Ziad A Ali, Jae K Oh, J Jane Cao
{"title":"将左心房应变纳入算法,改进左心室舒张功能障碍的评估:LA 应变和左心室舒张功能障碍评估。","authors":"Lin Wang, Jonathan Weber, Jason Craft, Michael Passick, Omar K Khalique, Ziad A Ali, Jae K Oh, J Jane Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The latest guidelines on echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) leave a significant proportion of patients with LVDD status undetermined. We aimed to examine the implication of an alternative algorithm incorporating left atrial (LA) strain as a tiebreaker on the indeterminate LVDD category.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We included 823 patients who underwent echocardiography and cardiac MRI within 7 days. LVDD was assessed by echocardiography following contemporary guidelines and an alternative algorithm including LA reservoir strain as a tie-breaker. LVDD was examined for its association with LV myocardial scar burden by cardiac MRI, and a composite outcome. 275 (33%) patients had LVDD, of whom 119 had advanced grades of LVDD (grade II-III), and 117 (14%) had indeterminate LVDD grade. When LA strain was applied at cut points of 18%, 24% and 35%, subjects were reclassified as normal or LVDD dependent accordingly. Reclassification allowed a similar outcome risk-stratification as the current guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LA reservoir strain improved LVDD assessment by eliminating indeterminate status/grade while maintaining the same effective outcome stratification as current guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction by including left atrial strain in the algorithm: LA Strain and LV diastolic dysfunction assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Lin Wang, Jonathan Weber, Jason Craft, Michael Passick, Omar K Khalique, Ziad A Ali, Jae K Oh, J Jane Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The latest guidelines on echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) leave a significant proportion of patients with LVDD status undetermined. We aimed to examine the implication of an alternative algorithm incorporating left atrial (LA) strain as a tiebreaker on the indeterminate LVDD category.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We included 823 patients who underwent echocardiography and cardiac MRI within 7 days. LVDD was assessed by echocardiography following contemporary guidelines and an alternative algorithm including LA reservoir strain as a tie-breaker. LVDD was examined for its association with LV myocardial scar burden by cardiac MRI, and a composite outcome. 275 (33%) patients had LVDD, of whom 119 had advanced grades of LVDD (grade II-III), and 117 (14%) had indeterminate LVDD grade. When LA strain was applied at cut points of 18%, 24% and 35%, subjects were reclassified as normal or LVDD dependent accordingly. Reclassification allowed a similar outcome risk-stratification as the current guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LA reservoir strain improved LVDD assessment by eliminating indeterminate status/grade while maintaining the same effective outcome stratification as current guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.064\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving the assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction by including left atrial strain in the algorithm: LA Strain and LV diastolic dysfunction assessment.
Background: The latest guidelines on echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) leave a significant proportion of patients with LVDD status undetermined. We aimed to examine the implication of an alternative algorithm incorporating left atrial (LA) strain as a tiebreaker on the indeterminate LVDD category.
Methods and results: We included 823 patients who underwent echocardiography and cardiac MRI within 7 days. LVDD was assessed by echocardiography following contemporary guidelines and an alternative algorithm including LA reservoir strain as a tie-breaker. LVDD was examined for its association with LV myocardial scar burden by cardiac MRI, and a composite outcome. 275 (33%) patients had LVDD, of whom 119 had advanced grades of LVDD (grade II-III), and 117 (14%) had indeterminate LVDD grade. When LA strain was applied at cut points of 18%, 24% and 35%, subjects were reclassified as normal or LVDD dependent accordingly. Reclassification allowed a similar outcome risk-stratification as the current guidelines.
Conclusions: LA reservoir strain improved LVDD assessment by eliminating indeterminate status/grade while maintaining the same effective outcome stratification as current guidelines.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.