漂白凝胶和发光二极管:牙齿颜色变化的比较。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Tina Shekari, Gina Agostini-Walesch, Alexandra Pierre-Bez, John C Mitchell
{"title":"漂白凝胶和发光二极管:牙齿颜色变化的比较。","authors":"Tina Shekari, Gina Agostini-Walesch, Alexandra Pierre-Bez, John C Mitchell","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure difference in tooth shade and color achieved via two different over-the-counter bleaching agents with and without their associated light-emitting diodes (LEDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 84 extracted human anterior teeth were randomly divided into seven groups. Gypsum models were made with 6 extracted teeth in an arch form (n = 12; 2 arches/group). Samples were kept hydrated throughout treatment (25°C). Bleaching treatment followed manufacturers' instructions with at least 1-h of rehydration between treatments. Control tooth arches were left untreated. L*a*b* values were measured with a Vita Easyshade (VITA North America, Yorba Linda, CA) three times per tooth using white and black backgrounds. ∆E (CIE 2000) was compared between and within treatment groups over time with ANOVA and post hoc Tukey (a = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subgroup testing confirmed the data were normally distributed. Two-way ANOVA showed significant interaction between product (Control, Crest, Snow) and treatment (light only, product only, light and product) on ∆E values for black (p-value < 0.001, F = 15.28) and white (p-value < 0.001, F = 13.62) backgrounds. Post hoc pairwise Tukey tests showed a significant effect of light-and-product treatments in contrast to light- or product-only treatments. Repeated measures ANOVA of between-treatment change (∆E) by product showed significant interaction between time and treatment for Snow products (p < 0.001, F = 10.9) and independent effects of time and treatment for Crest products (Time: p-value < 0.001, Treatment: p-value < 0.01, F = 7.21) on a black background. On white backgrounds, only a significant effect of treatment was reported for both Snow (p-value < 0.01, F = 5.427) and Crest (p-value < 0.001, F = 5.61).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, a combination of light and gel produces significantly higher tooth color and shade change over time, with the highest change seen for Snow products.</p><p><strong>Statement of significance: </strong>Many patients use over-the-counter tooth bleaching products because they are more cost effective and easier to access than in-office bleaching. However, these products may have adverse effects, such as increased sensitivity with repeated use, in addition to increased consumption of time and money. This project measured tooth shade between treatments which can help determine which product is most effective for at home use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bleaching Gels and Light-Emitting Diodes: Comparison of Tooth Color Change.\",\"authors\":\"Tina Shekari, Gina Agostini-Walesch, Alexandra Pierre-Bez, John C Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure difference in tooth shade and color achieved via two different over-the-counter bleaching agents with and without their associated light-emitting diodes (LEDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 84 extracted human anterior teeth were randomly divided into seven groups. Gypsum models were made with 6 extracted teeth in an arch form (n = 12; 2 arches/group). Samples were kept hydrated throughout treatment (25°C). Bleaching treatment followed manufacturers' instructions with at least 1-h of rehydration between treatments. Control tooth arches were left untreated. L*a*b* values were measured with a Vita Easyshade (VITA North America, Yorba Linda, CA) three times per tooth using white and black backgrounds. ∆E (CIE 2000) was compared between and within treatment groups over time with ANOVA and post hoc Tukey (a = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subgroup testing confirmed the data were normally distributed. Two-way ANOVA showed significant interaction between product (Control, Crest, Snow) and treatment (light only, product only, light and product) on ∆E values for black (p-value < 0.001, F = 15.28) and white (p-value < 0.001, F = 13.62) backgrounds. Post hoc pairwise Tukey tests showed a significant effect of light-and-product treatments in contrast to light- or product-only treatments. Repeated measures ANOVA of between-treatment change (∆E) by product showed significant interaction between time and treatment for Snow products (p < 0.001, F = 10.9) and independent effects of time and treatment for Crest products (Time: p-value < 0.001, Treatment: p-value < 0.01, F = 7.21) on a black background. On white backgrounds, only a significant effect of treatment was reported for both Snow (p-value < 0.01, F = 5.427) and Crest (p-value < 0.001, F = 5.61).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, a combination of light and gel produces significantly higher tooth color and shade change over time, with the highest change seen for Snow products.</p><p><strong>Statement of significance: </strong>Many patients use over-the-counter tooth bleaching products because they are more cost effective and easier to access than in-office bleaching. However, these products may have adverse effects, such as increased sensitivity with repeated use, in addition to increased consumption of time and money. This project measured tooth shade between treatments which can help determine which product is most effective for at home use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13359\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:测量两种不同的非处方漂白剂在使用和不使用相关发光二极管(LED)时所产生的牙色差异:测量两种不同的非处方漂白剂在使用和不使用相关发光二极管(LED)时所产生的牙齿色泽和颜色差异:总共 84 颗拔出的人类前牙被随机分为 7 组。将 6 颗拔出的牙齿制成石膏模型(n = 12;每组 2 颗)。样品在整个治疗过程中保持水合状态(25°C)。漂白处理按照制造商的说明进行,两次处理之间至少需要 1 小时的补水时间。对照组牙弓未经处理。使用 Vita Easyshade(VITA North America, Yorba Linda, CA)测量 L*a*b* 值,每颗牙齿使用白色和黑色背景各三次。∆通过方差分析和事后Tukey(a = 0.05)比较不同治疗组之间和治疗组内部随时间变化的ΔE(CIE 2000):分组测试证实数据呈正态分布。双向方差分析显示,产品(对照组、佳洁士组、雪花组)和处理(仅光照组、仅产品组、光照组和产品组)对黑色的 ∆E 值有显著的交互作用(p 值结论):总体而言,光和凝胶的组合随着时间的推移能产生明显更高的牙齿颜色和色泽变化,其中雪花产品的变化最大:许多患者使用非处方牙齿漂白产品,因为与诊室漂白相比,这些产品更经济、更容易获得。然而,这些产品可能会产生不良影响,如反复使用会增加敏感性,此外还会增加时间和金钱的消耗。本项目测量了两次治疗之间的牙齿色泽,这有助于确定哪种产品最适合在家中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bleaching Gels and Light-Emitting Diodes: Comparison of Tooth Color Change.

Objectives: To measure difference in tooth shade and color achieved via two different over-the-counter bleaching agents with and without their associated light-emitting diodes (LEDs).

Methods: A total of 84 extracted human anterior teeth were randomly divided into seven groups. Gypsum models were made with 6 extracted teeth in an arch form (n = 12; 2 arches/group). Samples were kept hydrated throughout treatment (25°C). Bleaching treatment followed manufacturers' instructions with at least 1-h of rehydration between treatments. Control tooth arches were left untreated. L*a*b* values were measured with a Vita Easyshade (VITA North America, Yorba Linda, CA) three times per tooth using white and black backgrounds. ∆E (CIE 2000) was compared between and within treatment groups over time with ANOVA and post hoc Tukey (a = 0.05).

Results: Subgroup testing confirmed the data were normally distributed. Two-way ANOVA showed significant interaction between product (Control, Crest, Snow) and treatment (light only, product only, light and product) on ∆E values for black (p-value < 0.001, F = 15.28) and white (p-value < 0.001, F = 13.62) backgrounds. Post hoc pairwise Tukey tests showed a significant effect of light-and-product treatments in contrast to light- or product-only treatments. Repeated measures ANOVA of between-treatment change (∆E) by product showed significant interaction between time and treatment for Snow products (p < 0.001, F = 10.9) and independent effects of time and treatment for Crest products (Time: p-value < 0.001, Treatment: p-value < 0.01, F = 7.21) on a black background. On white backgrounds, only a significant effect of treatment was reported for both Snow (p-value < 0.01, F = 5.427) and Crest (p-value < 0.001, F = 5.61).

Conclusions: Overall, a combination of light and gel produces significantly higher tooth color and shade change over time, with the highest change seen for Snow products.

Statement of significance: Many patients use over-the-counter tooth bleaching products because they are more cost effective and easier to access than in-office bleaching. However, these products may have adverse effects, such as increased sensitivity with repeated use, in addition to increased consumption of time and money. This project measured tooth shade between treatments which can help determine which product is most effective for at home use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信