腔内附着金属支架治疗鲁氏-Y 胃旁路术患者晚期难治性胃空肠结构的安全性和有效性(附视频)。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Rohit Agrawal, Soban Maan, Alejandra Méndez, Mouaz Haffar, Ethan M Cohen, Ayowumi A Adekolu, Matthew Krafft, Shyam Thakkar, Shailendra Singh
{"title":"腔内附着金属支架治疗鲁氏-Y 胃旁路术患者晚期难治性胃空肠结构的安全性和有效性(附视频)。","authors":"Rohit Agrawal, Soban Maan, Alejandra Méndez, Mouaz Haffar, Ethan M Cohen, Ayowumi A Adekolu, Matthew Krafft, Shyam Thakkar, Shailendra Singh","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08707-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) related late gastro-jejunal (GJ) strictures are often resistant to endoscopic balloon dilations. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) have been used to treat benign strictures with favorable results. However, the data remains limited to justify LAMS use for management of post-RYGB late GJ strictures. We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LAMS placement for the management of late GJ strictures that are refractory to balloon dilations in post-RYGB patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single center retrospective study that included all post-RYGB patients who underwent LAMS placement for management of late GJ strictures that had previously failed balloon dilations. Primary outcomes were technical and clinical success, and secondary outcomes were LAMS-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 patients underwent LAMS placement for management of GJ strictures. Median age was 60.5 (IQR 50.5, 67.0) years and majority were females (27, 96.4%). Median interval between surgery and first diagnosis of GJ stricture was 13 years (IQR 7, 17.5). 20 × 10 mm LAMS was the most used stent (n = 24, 85.7%). The median procedure time was 23.5 (IQR 14.5, 32.0) minutes. Technical and short-term clinical success of LAMS placement was 100% (95% CI 87.9-100.0). Long-term success was achieved in 19 out of 25 patients (76.0%, 95% CI 56.6-88.5) that had over 3 months follow-up after LAMS removal. Stent migration was noted in 2 (7.1%) patients, and 1 (3.6%) patient each experienced pain and minor bleeding without the need for additional interventions. No patient in our cohort required surgical revision of GJ anastomosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Placement of LAMS is safe, technically feasible, and associated with a high clinical success rate in patients with late GJ strictures after RYGB who have failed prior balloon dilations. Placement of LAMS can be considered early in patients requiring multiple balloon dilations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents for Management of Late Refractory Gastro-jejunal Structures in Patients with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (with Video).\",\"authors\":\"Rohit Agrawal, Soban Maan, Alejandra Méndez, Mouaz Haffar, Ethan M Cohen, Ayowumi A Adekolu, Matthew Krafft, Shyam Thakkar, Shailendra Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-024-08707-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) related late gastro-jejunal (GJ) strictures are often resistant to endoscopic balloon dilations. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) have been used to treat benign strictures with favorable results. However, the data remains limited to justify LAMS use for management of post-RYGB late GJ strictures. We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LAMS placement for the management of late GJ strictures that are refractory to balloon dilations in post-RYGB patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single center retrospective study that included all post-RYGB patients who underwent LAMS placement for management of late GJ strictures that had previously failed balloon dilations. Primary outcomes were technical and clinical success, and secondary outcomes were LAMS-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 patients underwent LAMS placement for management of GJ strictures. Median age was 60.5 (IQR 50.5, 67.0) years and majority were females (27, 96.4%). Median interval between surgery and first diagnosis of GJ stricture was 13 years (IQR 7, 17.5). 20 × 10 mm LAMS was the most used stent (n = 24, 85.7%). The median procedure time was 23.5 (IQR 14.5, 32.0) minutes. Technical and short-term clinical success of LAMS placement was 100% (95% CI 87.9-100.0). Long-term success was achieved in 19 out of 25 patients (76.0%, 95% CI 56.6-88.5) that had over 3 months follow-up after LAMS removal. Stent migration was noted in 2 (7.1%) patients, and 1 (3.6%) patient each experienced pain and minor bleeding without the need for additional interventions. No patient in our cohort required surgical revision of GJ anastomosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Placement of LAMS is safe, technically feasible, and associated with a high clinical success rate in patients with late GJ strictures after RYGB who have failed prior balloon dilations. Placement of LAMS can be considered early in patients requiring multiple balloon dilations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08707-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08707-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)相关的晚期胃空肠(GJ)狭窄通常对内窥镜球囊扩张术有抵抗力。腔隙贴合金属支架(LAMS)已被用于治疗良性狭窄,并取得了良好的效果。然而,用于治疗 RYGB 术后晚期 GJ 狭窄的数据仍然有限。我们的目的是评估 LAMS 用于治疗 RYGB 术后患者球囊扩张难治性晚期 GJ 狭窄的安全性和有效性:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入了所有接受 LAMS 置入术治疗球囊扩张失败的晚期 GJ 狭窄的 RYGB 术后患者。主要结果为技术和临床成功率,次要结果为 LAMS 相关不良事件:共有 28 名患者接受了 LAMS 置入术治疗 GJ 狭窄。中位年龄为 60.5(IQR 50.5,67.0)岁,大多数为女性(27 例,96.4%)。手术与首次诊断 GJ 狭窄之间的中位间隔为 13 年(IQR 7,17.5)。20 × 10 毫米 LAMS 是使用最多的支架(n = 24,85.7%)。中位手术时间为 23.5 分钟(IQR 14.5 - 32.0)。LAMS 置入的技术和短期临床成功率为 100%(95% CI 87.9-100.0)。在移除 LAMS 后随访 3 个月以上的 25 位患者中,19 位(76.0%,95% CI 56.6-88.5)获得了长期成功。2例(7.1%)患者出现支架移位,1例(3.6%)患者出现疼痛和轻微出血,但无需额外干预。我们的队列中没有患者需要对 GJ 吻合口进行手术翻修:结论:对于 RYGB 术后 GJ 狭窄且球囊扩张失败的晚期患者,置入 LAMS 安全、技术上可行且临床成功率高。对于需要多次球囊扩张的患者,可以尽早考虑放置 LAMS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Efficacy of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents for Management of Late Refractory Gastro-jejunal Structures in Patients with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (with Video).

Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) related late gastro-jejunal (GJ) strictures are often resistant to endoscopic balloon dilations. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) have been used to treat benign strictures with favorable results. However, the data remains limited to justify LAMS use for management of post-RYGB late GJ strictures. We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LAMS placement for the management of late GJ strictures that are refractory to balloon dilations in post-RYGB patients.

Methods: This was a single center retrospective study that included all post-RYGB patients who underwent LAMS placement for management of late GJ strictures that had previously failed balloon dilations. Primary outcomes were technical and clinical success, and secondary outcomes were LAMS-related adverse events.

Results: A total of 28 patients underwent LAMS placement for management of GJ strictures. Median age was 60.5 (IQR 50.5, 67.0) years and majority were females (27, 96.4%). Median interval between surgery and first diagnosis of GJ stricture was 13 years (IQR 7, 17.5). 20 × 10 mm LAMS was the most used stent (n = 24, 85.7%). The median procedure time was 23.5 (IQR 14.5, 32.0) minutes. Technical and short-term clinical success of LAMS placement was 100% (95% CI 87.9-100.0). Long-term success was achieved in 19 out of 25 patients (76.0%, 95% CI 56.6-88.5) that had over 3 months follow-up after LAMS removal. Stent migration was noted in 2 (7.1%) patients, and 1 (3.6%) patient each experienced pain and minor bleeding without the need for additional interventions. No patient in our cohort required surgical revision of GJ anastomosis.

Conclusion: Placement of LAMS is safe, technically feasible, and associated with a high clinical success rate in patients with late GJ strictures after RYGB who have failed prior balloon dilations. Placement of LAMS can be considered early in patients requiring multiple balloon dilations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信