松树下氮添加实验中,外生菌根疏水性和寄主关联对外生菌根 C 动态、N 动态和结实模式的影响

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Erik A. Hobbie, Georg Jocher, Matthias Peichl, Peng Zhao, Zaixing Zhou, Niles J. Hasselquist
{"title":"松树下氮添加实验中,外生菌根疏水性和寄主关联对外生菌根 C 动态、N 动态和结实模式的影响","authors":"Erik A. Hobbie, Georg Jocher, Matthias Peichl, Peng Zhao, Zaixing Zhou, Niles J. Hasselquist","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07022-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Fungal traits such as host specificity and hydrophobicity of ectomycorrhizae may correspond to functional attributes including enzymatic capabilities, carbon (C) demand from host plants, temporal patterns of fruiting, C sequestration, and nitrogen (N) sequestration. Here, we assessed how these traits influenced the timing of C dynamics and fungal processing of C and N, as integrated by patterns of δ<sup>13</sup>C, δ<sup>15</sup>N, %N, and timing of ectomycorrhizal sporocarp production.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We linked these sporocarp patterns to ectomycorrhizal hydrophobicity, host specificity, and daily gross primary production (GPP) across seven N fertilization treatments in two Swedish <i>Pinus sylvestris</i> forests.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>GPP of eight and 7–10 days prior to collection correlated positively with δ<sup>13</sup>C and negatively with %N, respectively, for ~ 80% of sporocarps, reflecting transit times of peak delivery of plant-derived carbohydrates to sporocarp formation. Hydrophobic taxa fruited 7–10 days later than hydrophilic taxa and conifer-specific sporocarps averaged four days later than generalists. Hydrophobic taxa and conifer-specific taxa were higher in δ<sup>15</sup>N than hydrophilic taxa and generalist-associated taxa.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Higher δ<sup>15</sup>N and later sporocarp collections suggested greater C demands for hydrophobic and conifer-specific taxa than for hydrophilic and generalist taxa. C accumulation times and high sequestration (hydrophobic taxa, host-specific taxa) versus low sequestration (hydrophilic taxa, generalist taxa) of <sup>15</sup>N-depleted chitin and <sup>13</sup>C-enriched carbohydrates in mycelia could account for late fruiting, <sup>15</sup>N enrichment, and <sup>13</sup>C depletion of hydrophobic taxa. We conclude that sporocarp production, hydrophobicity, and host specificity integrated functional information about belowground hyphal development and C accumulation times of C transfers from host <i>Pinus</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ectomycorrhizal hydrophobicity and host association influence ectomycorrhizal C dynamics, N dynamics, and fruiting patterns in N addition experiments under pine\",\"authors\":\"Erik A. Hobbie, Georg Jocher, Matthias Peichl, Peng Zhao, Zaixing Zhou, Niles J. Hasselquist\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-024-07022-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Fungal traits such as host specificity and hydrophobicity of ectomycorrhizae may correspond to functional attributes including enzymatic capabilities, carbon (C) demand from host plants, temporal patterns of fruiting, C sequestration, and nitrogen (N) sequestration. Here, we assessed how these traits influenced the timing of C dynamics and fungal processing of C and N, as integrated by patterns of δ<sup>13</sup>C, δ<sup>15</sup>N, %N, and timing of ectomycorrhizal sporocarp production.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We linked these sporocarp patterns to ectomycorrhizal hydrophobicity, host specificity, and daily gross primary production (GPP) across seven N fertilization treatments in two Swedish <i>Pinus sylvestris</i> forests.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>GPP of eight and 7–10 days prior to collection correlated positively with δ<sup>13</sup>C and negatively with %N, respectively, for ~ 80% of sporocarps, reflecting transit times of peak delivery of plant-derived carbohydrates to sporocarp formation. Hydrophobic taxa fruited 7–10 days later than hydrophilic taxa and conifer-specific sporocarps averaged four days later than generalists. Hydrophobic taxa and conifer-specific taxa were higher in δ<sup>15</sup>N than hydrophilic taxa and generalist-associated taxa.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Higher δ<sup>15</sup>N and later sporocarp collections suggested greater C demands for hydrophobic and conifer-specific taxa than for hydrophilic and generalist taxa. C accumulation times and high sequestration (hydrophobic taxa, host-specific taxa) versus low sequestration (hydrophilic taxa, generalist taxa) of <sup>15</sup>N-depleted chitin and <sup>13</sup>C-enriched carbohydrates in mycelia could account for late fruiting, <sup>15</sup>N enrichment, and <sup>13</sup>C depletion of hydrophobic taxa. We conclude that sporocarp production, hydrophobicity, and host specificity integrated functional information about belowground hyphal development and C accumulation times of C transfers from host <i>Pinus</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07022-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07022-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景外生菌根的真菌性状(如寄主特异性和疏水性)可能与功能属性相对应,包括酶能力、寄主植物对碳(C)的需求、结果的时间模式、碳螯合和氮(N)螯合。在这里,我们评估了这些特征如何影响碳动态和真菌处理碳与氮的时间,并通过δ13C、δ15N、%N和外生菌根孢子囊产生时间的模式进行了综合分析。方法我们将这些孢子囊模式与外生菌根疏水性、寄主特异性以及瑞典两片欧洲赤松林中七种氮肥处理的每日总初级生产力(GPP)联系起来。结果 对于约 80% 的孢子囊,采集前 8 天和 7-10 天的 GPP 分别与 δ13C 呈正相关,与 %N 呈负相关,这反映了植物源碳水化合物向孢子囊形成输送的高峰时间。疏水类群比亲水类群晚 7-10 天结果,针叶树特异性孢子囊平均比普通类群晚 4 天。疏水性类群和针叶树特异性类群的δ15N值高于亲水性类群和普通类群。C 积累时间以及菌丝体中 15N 贫化甲壳素和 13C 富集碳水化合物的高固着率(疏水性类群、寄主特异性类群)与低固着率(亲水性类群、通性类群)可能是疏水性类群后期结果、15N 富集和 13C 贫化的原因。我们的结论是,孢子囊的产生、疏水性和寄主特异性整合了地下菌丝发育的功能信息以及从寄主松柏转移 C 的 C 积累时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ectomycorrhizal hydrophobicity and host association influence ectomycorrhizal C dynamics, N dynamics, and fruiting patterns in N addition experiments under pine

Ectomycorrhizal hydrophobicity and host association influence ectomycorrhizal C dynamics, N dynamics, and fruiting patterns in N addition experiments under pine

Background

Fungal traits such as host specificity and hydrophobicity of ectomycorrhizae may correspond to functional attributes including enzymatic capabilities, carbon (C) demand from host plants, temporal patterns of fruiting, C sequestration, and nitrogen (N) sequestration. Here, we assessed how these traits influenced the timing of C dynamics and fungal processing of C and N, as integrated by patterns of δ13C, δ15N, %N, and timing of ectomycorrhizal sporocarp production.

Methods

We linked these sporocarp patterns to ectomycorrhizal hydrophobicity, host specificity, and daily gross primary production (GPP) across seven N fertilization treatments in two Swedish Pinus sylvestris forests.

Results

GPP of eight and 7–10 days prior to collection correlated positively with δ13C and negatively with %N, respectively, for ~ 80% of sporocarps, reflecting transit times of peak delivery of plant-derived carbohydrates to sporocarp formation. Hydrophobic taxa fruited 7–10 days later than hydrophilic taxa and conifer-specific sporocarps averaged four days later than generalists. Hydrophobic taxa and conifer-specific taxa were higher in δ15N than hydrophilic taxa and generalist-associated taxa.

Conclusions

Higher δ15N and later sporocarp collections suggested greater C demands for hydrophobic and conifer-specific taxa than for hydrophilic and generalist taxa. C accumulation times and high sequestration (hydrophobic taxa, host-specific taxa) versus low sequestration (hydrophilic taxa, generalist taxa) of 15N-depleted chitin and 13C-enriched carbohydrates in mycelia could account for late fruiting, 15N enrichment, and 13C depletion of hydrophobic taxa. We conclude that sporocarp production, hydrophobicity, and host specificity integrated functional information about belowground hyphal development and C accumulation times of C transfers from host Pinus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信