Eike Wehling, Trine Schow, Karin Spangsberg Kristensen, Eirik Vikane, Helle K. Falkenberg
{"title":"后天性脑损伤后视力障碍的识别--当前实践、转诊和障碍","authors":"Eike Wehling, Trine Schow, Karin Spangsberg Kristensen, Eirik Vikane, Helle K. Falkenberg","doi":"10.1155/2024/4858210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Purpose:</b> Visual impairment (VI) is still underdiagnosed in patients with acquired brain injury despite the large impact on daily life activities and rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to explore the current practice of identification of VI, management plans, referrals, and experienced barriers in Norwegian hospital settings.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> An online survey was sent out to leaders (<i>n</i> = 62) in hospitals treating patients with acquired brain injury. Data from 22 items covering routines, interdisciplinary collaboration, assessment tools, protocols, barriers, referral practice, and background information were collected.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Respondents (<i>n</i> = 108) comprised various professions from mainly acute or subacute settings. Visual field deficits, oculomotor dysfunction, and neglect were most commonly but not routinely assessed (53%–57%). Besides medical examination, patient interviews, and observations rather than standardized tests or questionnaires (82% vs.25%) were used. Few workplaces seemed to have interdisciplinary vision teams (13%). Barriers were patient characteristics such as cognitive and language impairment and limited resources. Below half (45%) felt competent in assessing VI or had attended courses on the topic (44%).</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The study highlights the need to implement standardized assessment, improve interdisciplinary collaboration, and facilitate training courses to enable hospital staff to assess VI after brain injury. These steps could contribute to improved assessment and management of VI and contribute to overcome the indicated barriers leading to better patient care and outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4858210","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Visual Impairment After Acquired Brain Injury—Current Practice, Referrals, and Barriers\",\"authors\":\"Eike Wehling, Trine Schow, Karin Spangsberg Kristensen, Eirik Vikane, Helle K. Falkenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/4858210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Purpose:</b> Visual impairment (VI) is still underdiagnosed in patients with acquired brain injury despite the large impact on daily life activities and rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to explore the current practice of identification of VI, management plans, referrals, and experienced barriers in Norwegian hospital settings.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> An online survey was sent out to leaders (<i>n</i> = 62) in hospitals treating patients with acquired brain injury. Data from 22 items covering routines, interdisciplinary collaboration, assessment tools, protocols, barriers, referral practice, and background information were collected.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Respondents (<i>n</i> = 108) comprised various professions from mainly acute or subacute settings. Visual field deficits, oculomotor dysfunction, and neglect were most commonly but not routinely assessed (53%–57%). Besides medical examination, patient interviews, and observations rather than standardized tests or questionnaires (82% vs.25%) were used. Few workplaces seemed to have interdisciplinary vision teams (13%). Barriers were patient characteristics such as cognitive and language impairment and limited resources. Below half (45%) felt competent in assessing VI or had attended courses on the topic (44%).</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The study highlights the need to implement standardized assessment, improve interdisciplinary collaboration, and facilitate training courses to enable hospital staff to assess VI after brain injury. These steps could contribute to improved assessment and management of VI and contribute to overcome the indicated barriers leading to better patient care and outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4858210\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4858210\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4858210","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:尽管视觉障碍(VI)对日常生活活动和康复有很大影响,但后天性脑损伤患者的视觉障碍诊断率仍然很低。本研究旨在探讨挪威医院目前在识别视力障碍、管理计划、转诊和遇到的障碍等方面的做法:对治疗后天性脑损伤患者的医院领导(62人)进行了在线调查。调查收集了22个项目的数据,涉及常规、跨学科合作、评估工具、协议、障碍、转诊做法和背景信息:受访者(108 人)主要来自急诊或亚急性医院的不同专业。视野缺损、眼球运动功能障碍和忽视是最常见的评估项目,但并非常规评估项目(53%-57%)。除了医学检查外,还使用病人访谈和观察,而不是标准化测试或问卷(82% 对 25%)。似乎很少有工作场所设有跨学科视力小组(13%)。患者的认知和语言障碍以及有限的资源等特点是障碍。不到一半(45%)的人认为自己有能力评估视力障碍或参加过相关课程(44%):这项研究强调了实施标准化评估、改善跨学科合作和促进培训课程的必要性,以使医院员工能够评估脑损伤后的视力障碍。这些措施将有助于改善对 VI 的评估和管理,并有助于克服所指出的障碍,从而改善患者护理和治疗效果。
Identifying Visual Impairment After Acquired Brain Injury—Current Practice, Referrals, and Barriers
Purpose: Visual impairment (VI) is still underdiagnosed in patients with acquired brain injury despite the large impact on daily life activities and rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to explore the current practice of identification of VI, management plans, referrals, and experienced barriers in Norwegian hospital settings.
Materials and Methods: An online survey was sent out to leaders (n = 62) in hospitals treating patients with acquired brain injury. Data from 22 items covering routines, interdisciplinary collaboration, assessment tools, protocols, barriers, referral practice, and background information were collected.
Results: Respondents (n = 108) comprised various professions from mainly acute or subacute settings. Visual field deficits, oculomotor dysfunction, and neglect were most commonly but not routinely assessed (53%–57%). Besides medical examination, patient interviews, and observations rather than standardized tests or questionnaires (82% vs.25%) were used. Few workplaces seemed to have interdisciplinary vision teams (13%). Barriers were patient characteristics such as cognitive and language impairment and limited resources. Below half (45%) felt competent in assessing VI or had attended courses on the topic (44%).
Conclusions: The study highlights the need to implement standardized assessment, improve interdisciplinary collaboration, and facilitate training courses to enable hospital staff to assess VI after brain injury. These steps could contribute to improved assessment and management of VI and contribute to overcome the indicated barriers leading to better patient care and outcome.
期刊介绍:
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.