Lee R. J. Hughes, Jacob G. Sorbello, Kurt Piron, Corey Allen, Timothy Piatkowski, Grant J. Devilly
{"title":"研究夜间娱乐区毒品筛查技术的使用情况","authors":"Lee R. J. Hughes, Jacob G. Sorbello, Kurt Piron, Corey Allen, Timothy Piatkowski, Grant J. Devilly","doi":"10.1007/s11292-024-09643-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>We sought to determine whether various ion scanner devices could provide a practical alternative in field-based research, where affordable and accessible drug screening is needed for comprehensive and ongoing investigation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In Study 1, off-site sample analysis proved inconclusive, rendering Protocols A and B impractical for ongoing drug screening. Conversely, Study 2’s on-site, real-time analysis (Protocol C) emerged as a more effective method. The Itemizer3, particularly in Protocol C, excelled in discerning drug users. Comparing admitted drug use rates in both studies, the mere presence of an objective measure, confirmational or not, likely facilitated more truthful participant responses, highlighting the efficacy of real-time, on-site drug screening using IMS/ITMS technologies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Findings</h3><p>All samples analyzed off-site in Study 1 were found to be inconclusive. As such, Protocols A and B were not feasible for on-going drug screening and monitoring. Conversely, the results of Study 2 Protocol C demonstrated that harvesting samples directly off participants on-site and analyzing these in-real time to be a more efficacious method. Our findings in Protocol C also show that the Itemizer3 was better at identifying those who did not use drugs from those who did. Looking at the incidence rates of admitted drug use in Studies 1 and 2, we find that simply having an objective measure present (irrespective of whether it is confirmational or not) likely resulted in us obtaining more truthful responses from participants about their use of drugs.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Our results underscore IMS/ITMS practicality for on-site NED drug screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":47684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the use of drug screening technologies in night-time entertainment districts\",\"authors\":\"Lee R. J. Hughes, Jacob G. Sorbello, Kurt Piron, Corey Allen, Timothy Piatkowski, Grant J. Devilly\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11292-024-09643-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>We sought to determine whether various ion scanner devices could provide a practical alternative in field-based research, where affordable and accessible drug screening is needed for comprehensive and ongoing investigation.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>In Study 1, off-site sample analysis proved inconclusive, rendering Protocols A and B impractical for ongoing drug screening. Conversely, Study 2’s on-site, real-time analysis (Protocol C) emerged as a more effective method. The Itemizer3, particularly in Protocol C, excelled in discerning drug users. Comparing admitted drug use rates in both studies, the mere presence of an objective measure, confirmational or not, likely facilitated more truthful participant responses, highlighting the efficacy of real-time, on-site drug screening using IMS/ITMS technologies.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Findings</h3><p>All samples analyzed off-site in Study 1 were found to be inconclusive. As such, Protocols A and B were not feasible for on-going drug screening and monitoring. Conversely, the results of Study 2 Protocol C demonstrated that harvesting samples directly off participants on-site and analyzing these in-real time to be a more efficacious method. Our findings in Protocol C also show that the Itemizer3 was better at identifying those who did not use drugs from those who did. Looking at the incidence rates of admitted drug use in Studies 1 and 2, we find that simply having an objective measure present (irrespective of whether it is confirmational or not) likely resulted in us obtaining more truthful responses from participants about their use of drugs.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Our results underscore IMS/ITMS practicality for on-site NED drug screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-024-09643-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-024-09643-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景我们试图确定各种离子扫描仪是否能为现场研究提供一种实用的替代方法,因为现场研究需要经济实惠、方便使用的药物筛查来进行全面和持续的调查。方法在研究 1 中,非现场样本分析被证明是不确定的,因此方案 A 和 B 对于持续的药物筛查是不切实际的。相反,研究 2 的现场实时分析(方案 C)则是一种更有效的方法。Itemizer3,尤其是在 C 方案中,在识别吸毒者方面表现出色。比较这两项研究中被承认的吸毒率,无论是否确证,只要有客观的测量方法,就有可能促进被试做出更真实的回答,这凸显了使用 IMS/ITMS 技术进行实时现场毒品筛查的功效。因此,方案 A 和 B 不适合用于持续的药物筛查和监测。相反,研究 2 方案 C 的结果表明,直接从参与者身上采集现场样本并进行实时分析是一种更有效的方法。我们在 C 方案中的研究结果还表明,Itemizer3 能更好地从吸毒者中识别出未吸毒者。从研究 1 和研究 2 中承认的吸毒发生率来看,我们发现,只要有一个客观的测量方法(无论其是否具有确认性),我们就能从参与者那里获得更真实的吸毒情况。
Examining the use of drug screening technologies in night-time entertainment districts
Background
We sought to determine whether various ion scanner devices could provide a practical alternative in field-based research, where affordable and accessible drug screening is needed for comprehensive and ongoing investigation.
Methods
In Study 1, off-site sample analysis proved inconclusive, rendering Protocols A and B impractical for ongoing drug screening. Conversely, Study 2’s on-site, real-time analysis (Protocol C) emerged as a more effective method. The Itemizer3, particularly in Protocol C, excelled in discerning drug users. Comparing admitted drug use rates in both studies, the mere presence of an objective measure, confirmational or not, likely facilitated more truthful participant responses, highlighting the efficacy of real-time, on-site drug screening using IMS/ITMS technologies.
Findings
All samples analyzed off-site in Study 1 were found to be inconclusive. As such, Protocols A and B were not feasible for on-going drug screening and monitoring. Conversely, the results of Study 2 Protocol C demonstrated that harvesting samples directly off participants on-site and analyzing these in-real time to be a more efficacious method. Our findings in Protocol C also show that the Itemizer3 was better at identifying those who did not use drugs from those who did. Looking at the incidence rates of admitted drug use in Studies 1 and 2, we find that simply having an objective measure present (irrespective of whether it is confirmational or not) likely resulted in us obtaining more truthful responses from participants about their use of drugs.
Conclusions
Our results underscore IMS/ITMS practicality for on-site NED drug screening.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Criminology focuses on high quality experimental and quasi-experimental research in the advancement of criminological theory and/or the development of evidence based crime and justice policy. The journal is also committed to the advancement of the science of systematic reviews and experimental methods in criminology and criminal justice. The journal seeks empirical papers on experimental and quasi-experimental studies, systematic reviews on substantive criminological and criminal justice issues, and methodological papers on experimentation and systematic review. The journal encourages submissions from scholars in the broad array of scientific disciplines that are concerned with criminology as well as crime and justice problems.