揭示供应链距离对可持续发展采纳的影响:来自多方利益相关者伙伴关系的经验证据

Ana P. Ferreira Alves, Minelle E. Silva, Philipp C. Sauer
{"title":"揭示供应链距离对可持续发展采纳的影响:来自多方利益相关者伙伴关系的经验证据","authors":"Ana P. Ferreira Alves, Minelle E. Silva, Philipp C. Sauer","doi":"10.1108/scm-12-2023-0637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>To investigate the effects of supply chain (SC) distance on sustainability adoption, this study aims to advance the way prior studies on SC sustainability presume that SC structures are well-developed and stable. Since SC members face structural voids in different regions, we recognize that the information flow is impacted as SC partners often have limited knowledge of their direct partners. Thus, by studying a multi-stakeholder partnership, this article sheds light on the institutional foundation of sustainability adoption issues largely neglected to date.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A qualitative case study was used with members of an MSP (i.e. a roundtable), to understand the beef SC located in Brazil. Overall, 18 h of interview recordings and notes from 18 h of meeting observations were gathered, equaling 36 h of primary data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Four dimensions of SC distance (physical, organizational, cultural and institutional) were identified, generating three driving effects on symbolic sustainability adoption and, consequently, a degree of invisibility for beef SC members. The results explain the process of sustainability adoption and highlight that smaller and more upstream suppliers show lower degrees of substantive adoption of SC sustainability practices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study investigates how SC distance affects the alignment of SC members in terms of sustainability adoption. By providing reflections on how institutional distance can hinder suppliers from adopting sustainability requirements they received from the SC, this research contributes to shifting from sustainability discourse to real practice and proactive partner engagement.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":30468,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Management Journal","volume":"132 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering effects of supply chain distance on sustainability adoption: empirical evidence from a multi-stakeholder partnership\",\"authors\":\"Ana P. Ferreira Alves, Minelle E. Silva, Philipp C. Sauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/scm-12-2023-0637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>To investigate the effects of supply chain (SC) distance on sustainability adoption, this study aims to advance the way prior studies on SC sustainability presume that SC structures are well-developed and stable. Since SC members face structural voids in different regions, we recognize that the information flow is impacted as SC partners often have limited knowledge of their direct partners. Thus, by studying a multi-stakeholder partnership, this article sheds light on the institutional foundation of sustainability adoption issues largely neglected to date.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>A qualitative case study was used with members of an MSP (i.e. a roundtable), to understand the beef SC located in Brazil. Overall, 18 h of interview recordings and notes from 18 h of meeting observations were gathered, equaling 36 h of primary data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Four dimensions of SC distance (physical, organizational, cultural and institutional) were identified, generating three driving effects on symbolic sustainability adoption and, consequently, a degree of invisibility for beef SC members. The results explain the process of sustainability adoption and highlight that smaller and more upstream suppliers show lower degrees of substantive adoption of SC sustainability practices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study investigates how SC distance affects the alignment of SC members in terms of sustainability adoption. By providing reflections on how institutional distance can hinder suppliers from adopting sustainability requirements they received from the SC, this research contributes to shifting from sustainability discourse to real practice and proactive partner engagement.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":30468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supply Chain Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"132 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supply Chain Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-12-2023-0637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-12-2023-0637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的为了研究供应链(SC)距离对可持续发展采纳的影响,本研究旨在改进以往有关供应链可持续发展的研究中假设供应链结构完善且稳定的方式。由于供应链成员在不同地区面临结构性空白,我们认识到,供应链合作伙伴对其直接合作伙伴的了解往往有限,从而影响了信息流。因此,本文通过研究一个多利益相关者伙伴关系,揭示了迄今为止在很大程度上被忽视的可持续发展采纳问题的制度基础。设计/方法/途径对一个多利益相关者伙伴关系(即圆桌会议)的成员进行了定性案例研究,以了解巴西的牛肉可持续发展委员会。总体而言,收集了 18 个小时的访谈记录和 18 个小时的会议观察记录,相当于 36 个小时的原始数据。研究结果确定了可持续发展委员会距离的四个维度(物理、组织、文化和制度),对象征性的可持续发展采纳产生了三种驱动效应,因此,牛肉可持续发展委员会成员在一定程度上被忽视。研究结果解释了可持续性采纳的过程,并强调较小和较上游的供应商对供应链可持续性实践的实质性采纳程度较低。 原创性/价值 本研究调查了供应链距离如何影响供应链成员在可持续性采纳方面的一致性。通过反思制度距离如何阻碍供应商采纳他们从 SC 收到的可持续发展要求,本研究有助于从可持续发展论述转向真正的实践和积极的合作伙伴参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uncovering effects of supply chain distance on sustainability adoption: empirical evidence from a multi-stakeholder partnership

Purpose

To investigate the effects of supply chain (SC) distance on sustainability adoption, this study aims to advance the way prior studies on SC sustainability presume that SC structures are well-developed and stable. Since SC members face structural voids in different regions, we recognize that the information flow is impacted as SC partners often have limited knowledge of their direct partners. Thus, by studying a multi-stakeholder partnership, this article sheds light on the institutional foundation of sustainability adoption issues largely neglected to date.

Design/methodology/approach

A qualitative case study was used with members of an MSP (i.e. a roundtable), to understand the beef SC located in Brazil. Overall, 18 h of interview recordings and notes from 18 h of meeting observations were gathered, equaling 36 h of primary data.

Findings

Four dimensions of SC distance (physical, organizational, cultural and institutional) were identified, generating three driving effects on symbolic sustainability adoption and, consequently, a degree of invisibility for beef SC members. The results explain the process of sustainability adoption and highlight that smaller and more upstream suppliers show lower degrees of substantive adoption of SC sustainability practices.

Originality/value

This study investigates how SC distance affects the alignment of SC members in terms of sustainability adoption. By providing reflections on how institutional distance can hinder suppliers from adopting sustainability requirements they received from the SC, this research contributes to shifting from sustainability discourse to real practice and proactive partner engagement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信