利用个性化结构协方差网络分析解决创伤后应激障碍的异质性问题

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Xueling Suo, Nanfang Pan, Li Chen, Lingjiang Li, Graham J. Kemp, Song Wang, Qiyong Gong
{"title":"利用个性化结构协方差网络分析解决创伤后应激障碍的异质性问题","authors":"Xueling Suo,&nbsp;Nanfang Pan,&nbsp;Li Chen,&nbsp;Lingjiang Li,&nbsp;Graham J. Kemp,&nbsp;Song Wang,&nbsp;Qiyong Gong","doi":"10.1155/2024/4399757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>The heterogeneity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an obstacle to both understanding and therapy, and this has prompted a search for internally homogeneous neuroradiological subgroups within the broad clinical diagnosis. We set out to do this using the individual differential structural covariance network (IDSCN). We constructed cortical thickness-based IDSCN using T1-weighted images of 89 individuals with PTSD (mean age 42.8 years, 60 female) and 89 demographically matched trauma-exposed non-PTSD (TENP) controls (mean age 43.1 years, 63 female). The IDSCN metric quantifies how the structural covariance edges in a patient differ from those in the controls. We examined the structural diversity of PTSD and variation among subtypes using a hierarchical clustering analysis. PTSD patients exhibited notable diversity in distinct structural covariance edges but mainly affecting three networks: default mode, ventral attention, and sensorimotor. These changes predicted individual PTSD symptom severity. We identified two neuroanatomical subtypes: the one with higher PTSD symptom severity showed lower structural covariance edges in the frontal cortex and between frontal, parietal, and occipital cortex—regions that are functionally implicated in selective attention, response selection, and learning tasks. Thus, deviations in structural covariance in large-scale networks are common in PTSD but fall into two subtypes. This work sheds light on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the clinical heterogeneity and may aid in personalized diagnosis and therapeutic interventions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4399757","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resolving Heterogeneity in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Using Individualized Structural Covariance Network Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xueling Suo,&nbsp;Nanfang Pan,&nbsp;Li Chen,&nbsp;Lingjiang Li,&nbsp;Graham J. Kemp,&nbsp;Song Wang,&nbsp;Qiyong Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/4399757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>The heterogeneity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an obstacle to both understanding and therapy, and this has prompted a search for internally homogeneous neuroradiological subgroups within the broad clinical diagnosis. We set out to do this using the individual differential structural covariance network (IDSCN). We constructed cortical thickness-based IDSCN using T1-weighted images of 89 individuals with PTSD (mean age 42.8 years, 60 female) and 89 demographically matched trauma-exposed non-PTSD (TENP) controls (mean age 43.1 years, 63 female). The IDSCN metric quantifies how the structural covariance edges in a patient differ from those in the controls. We examined the structural diversity of PTSD and variation among subtypes using a hierarchical clustering analysis. PTSD patients exhibited notable diversity in distinct structural covariance edges but mainly affecting three networks: default mode, ventral attention, and sensorimotor. These changes predicted individual PTSD symptom severity. We identified two neuroanatomical subtypes: the one with higher PTSD symptom severity showed lower structural covariance edges in the frontal cortex and between frontal, parietal, and occipital cortex—regions that are functionally implicated in selective attention, response selection, and learning tasks. Thus, deviations in structural covariance in large-scale networks are common in PTSD but fall into two subtypes. This work sheds light on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the clinical heterogeneity and may aid in personalized diagnosis and therapeutic interventions.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4399757\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4399757\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4399757","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的异质性是理解和治疗的障碍,这促使我们在广泛的临床诊断中寻找内部同质的神经放射学亚组。我们利用个体差异结构协方差网络(IDSCN)来实现这一目标。我们使用 89 名创伤后应激障碍患者(平均年龄 42.8 岁,女性 60 人)和 89 名人口统计学匹配的创伤暴露非创伤后应激障碍(TENP)对照组(平均年龄 43.1 岁,女性 63 人)的 T1 加权图像构建了基于皮层厚度的 IDSCN。IDSCN 指标量化了患者的结构协方差边与对照组的结构协方差边之间的差异。我们通过分层聚类分析研究了创伤后应激障碍的结构多样性和亚型之间的差异。创伤后应激障碍患者在不同的结构协方差边上表现出显著的多样性,但主要影响三个网络:默认模式、腹侧注意和感觉运动。这些变化预测了个人创伤后应激障碍症状的严重程度。我们发现了两种神经解剖亚型:创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度较高的患者在额叶皮层以及额叶、顶叶和枕叶皮层之间的结构协方差边缘较低,而这些区域在功能上与选择性注意、反应选择和学习任务有关。因此,大规模网络结构协方差的偏差在创伤后应激障碍中很常见,但可分为两种亚型。这项研究揭示了临床异质性的神经生物学机制,可能有助于个性化诊断和治疗干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Resolving Heterogeneity in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Using Individualized Structural Covariance Network Analysis

Resolving Heterogeneity in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Using Individualized Structural Covariance Network Analysis

The heterogeneity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an obstacle to both understanding and therapy, and this has prompted a search for internally homogeneous neuroradiological subgroups within the broad clinical diagnosis. We set out to do this using the individual differential structural covariance network (IDSCN). We constructed cortical thickness-based IDSCN using T1-weighted images of 89 individuals with PTSD (mean age 42.8 years, 60 female) and 89 demographically matched trauma-exposed non-PTSD (TENP) controls (mean age 43.1 years, 63 female). The IDSCN metric quantifies how the structural covariance edges in a patient differ from those in the controls. We examined the structural diversity of PTSD and variation among subtypes using a hierarchical clustering analysis. PTSD patients exhibited notable diversity in distinct structural covariance edges but mainly affecting three networks: default mode, ventral attention, and sensorimotor. These changes predicted individual PTSD symptom severity. We identified two neuroanatomical subtypes: the one with higher PTSD symptom severity showed lower structural covariance edges in the frontal cortex and between frontal, parietal, and occipital cortex—regions that are functionally implicated in selective attention, response selection, and learning tasks. Thus, deviations in structural covariance in large-scale networks are common in PTSD but fall into two subtypes. This work sheds light on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the clinical heterogeneity and may aid in personalized diagnosis and therapeutic interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信