{"title":"TAVI 与 SAVR 患者的术后谵妄--系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) have different levels of invasiveness which can result in different levels of functional status after the procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to detect studies showing direct comparison between TAVI and SAVR regarding postoperative functional status. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) after TAVI or SAVR, assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality, stroke, major bleeding, and hospital length of stay (LOS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 1,161 manuscripts, of which 10 studies (12,015 patients) were analyzed. TAVI patients had a significantly lower incidence of POD (OR: 0.35, 95 % CI, 0.26–0.48, p < 0.01) compared to SAVR patients. No significant differences were found in secondary outcomes between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>TAVI is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative delirium compared to SAVR without compromising length of stay or other major clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to understand the impact of postoperative delirium on short and long-term outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative delirium in patients undergoing TAVI versus SAVR – A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) have different levels of invasiveness which can result in different levels of functional status after the procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to detect studies showing direct comparison between TAVI and SAVR regarding postoperative functional status. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) after TAVI or SAVR, assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality, stroke, major bleeding, and hospital length of stay (LOS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 1,161 manuscripts, of which 10 studies (12,015 patients) were analyzed. TAVI patients had a significantly lower incidence of POD (OR: 0.35, 95 % CI, 0.26–0.48, p < 0.01) compared to SAVR patients. No significant differences were found in secondary outcomes between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>TAVI is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative delirium compared to SAVR without compromising length of stay or other major clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to understand the impact of postoperative delirium on short and long-term outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJC Heart and Vasculature\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJC Heart and Vasculature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724002100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906724002100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Postoperative delirium in patients undergoing TAVI versus SAVR – A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) have different levels of invasiveness which can result in different levels of functional status after the procedure.
Methods
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to detect studies showing direct comparison between TAVI and SAVR regarding postoperative functional status. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) after TAVI or SAVR, assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality, stroke, major bleeding, and hospital length of stay (LOS).
Results
We identified 1,161 manuscripts, of which 10 studies (12,015 patients) were analyzed. TAVI patients had a significantly lower incidence of POD (OR: 0.35, 95 % CI, 0.26–0.48, p < 0.01) compared to SAVR patients. No significant differences were found in secondary outcomes between the groups.
Conclusions
TAVI is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative delirium compared to SAVR without compromising length of stay or other major clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to understand the impact of postoperative delirium on short and long-term outcomes.
期刊介绍:
IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.