针对有额外需求儿童的父母的心理健康和幸福的在线干预:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Monica Leo, Helen Bourke-Taylor, Sorcha Odgers, Loredana Tirlea
{"title":"针对有额外需求儿童的父母的心理健康和幸福的在线干预:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Monica Leo, Helen Bourke-Taylor, Sorcha Odgers, Loredana Tirlea","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.13004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Parents of children with additional needs experience compromised physical and mental health and higher stress, and their ability to engage in meaningful occupations is impacted by their additional caregiving tasks. Online interventions targeting mental health, stress, and well-being for parents of children with additional needs have potential to increase supports alongside occupational therapy direct services. The aims of this review are to systematically identify and synthesise evidence of effectiveness of online interventions aimed at improving mental health, stress, and well-being of parents of children with additional needs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eight databases were searched up to July 2024 to identify online interventions for parents of children with additional needs. Studies were appraised for methodological quality. Standardised effect sizes were calculated, and meta-analyses of randomised control trials (RCTs) were conducted on outcomes of mental health, well-being, and stress.</p><p><strong>Consumer and community involvement: </strong>There was no consumer or community involvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systematic screening identified 30 papers that met inclusion criteria. Most were RCTs or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) with 'moderate' quality ratings: Three were designed by occupational therapists. There was substantial variation in intervention types, methods of delivery, outcomes, and outcome measures used. The pooled standardised effect size estimates (ES) and the lower and upper confidence intervals (CI) of online interventions from RCTs post-interventions were significant for mental health ES = 0.47, 95% CI (0.18, 0.77), p = 0.002; stress ES = 1.27, 95% CI (0.56, 1.98), p = 0.000; and well-being ES = 0.65, 95% CI (1.2, 0.06), p = 0.03, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The online interventions that aimed to improve mental health, stress, and well-being included in this meta-analysis were effective. Occupational therapists supporting families play an important role in guiding parents of children with additional needs to evidence-based interventions to support them with addressing their own mental health and well-being needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online interventions for the mental health and well-being of parents of children with additional needs: Systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Monica Leo, Helen Bourke-Taylor, Sorcha Odgers, Loredana Tirlea\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1440-1630.13004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Parents of children with additional needs experience compromised physical and mental health and higher stress, and their ability to engage in meaningful occupations is impacted by their additional caregiving tasks. Online interventions targeting mental health, stress, and well-being for parents of children with additional needs have potential to increase supports alongside occupational therapy direct services. The aims of this review are to systematically identify and synthesise evidence of effectiveness of online interventions aimed at improving mental health, stress, and well-being of parents of children with additional needs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eight databases were searched up to July 2024 to identify online interventions for parents of children with additional needs. Studies were appraised for methodological quality. Standardised effect sizes were calculated, and meta-analyses of randomised control trials (RCTs) were conducted on outcomes of mental health, well-being, and stress.</p><p><strong>Consumer and community involvement: </strong>There was no consumer or community involvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systematic screening identified 30 papers that met inclusion criteria. Most were RCTs or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) with 'moderate' quality ratings: Three were designed by occupational therapists. There was substantial variation in intervention types, methods of delivery, outcomes, and outcome measures used. The pooled standardised effect size estimates (ES) and the lower and upper confidence intervals (CI) of online interventions from RCTs post-interventions were significant for mental health ES = 0.47, 95% CI (0.18, 0.77), p = 0.002; stress ES = 1.27, 95% CI (0.56, 1.98), p = 0.000; and well-being ES = 0.65, 95% CI (1.2, 0.06), p = 0.03, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The online interventions that aimed to improve mental health, stress, and well-being included in this meta-analysis were effective. Occupational therapists supporting families play an important role in guiding parents of children with additional needs to evidence-based interventions to support them with addressing their own mental health and well-being needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.13004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.13004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介有额外需求儿童的父母身心健康会受到损害,压力也更大,他们从事有意义职业的能力也会受到额外照顾任务的影响。针对有额外需求儿童家长的心理健康、压力和幸福感的在线干预措施有可能与职业治疗直接服务一起增加支持。本综述旨在系统地识别和综合旨在改善有额外需求儿童的父母的心理健康、压力和福祉的在线干预措施的有效性证据:方法:检索了截至 2024 年 7 月的八个数据库,以确定针对有额外需求儿童家长的在线干预措施。对研究进行了方法学质量评估。计算了标准化效应大小,并对随机对照试验(RCT)的心理健康、幸福感和压力结果进行了荟萃分析:没有消费者或社区参与:结果:系统筛选出 30 篇符合纳入标准的论文。其中大部分是质量评级为 "中等 "的 RCT 或对照临床试验 (CCT):其中三篇由职业治疗师设计。在干预类型、实施方法、结果和所使用的结果测量方法方面存在很大差异。干预后的RCT在线干预的集合标准化效应大小估计值(ES)和置信区间(CI)的下限和上限分别为:心理健康ES=0.47,95% CI(0.18,0.77),p=0.002;压力ES=1.27,95% CI(0.56,1.98),p=0.000;幸福感ES=0.65,95% CI(1.2,0.06),p=0.03:本荟萃分析所包含的旨在改善心理健康、压力和幸福感的在线干预措施是有效的。支持家庭的职业治疗师在指导有额外需求儿童的家长采取循证干预措施以支持他们解决自身心理健康和幸福需求方面发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online interventions for the mental health and well-being of parents of children with additional needs: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Parents of children with additional needs experience compromised physical and mental health and higher stress, and their ability to engage in meaningful occupations is impacted by their additional caregiving tasks. Online interventions targeting mental health, stress, and well-being for parents of children with additional needs have potential to increase supports alongside occupational therapy direct services. The aims of this review are to systematically identify and synthesise evidence of effectiveness of online interventions aimed at improving mental health, stress, and well-being of parents of children with additional needs.

Method: Eight databases were searched up to July 2024 to identify online interventions for parents of children with additional needs. Studies were appraised for methodological quality. Standardised effect sizes were calculated, and meta-analyses of randomised control trials (RCTs) were conducted on outcomes of mental health, well-being, and stress.

Consumer and community involvement: There was no consumer or community involvement.

Results: Systematic screening identified 30 papers that met inclusion criteria. Most were RCTs or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) with 'moderate' quality ratings: Three were designed by occupational therapists. There was substantial variation in intervention types, methods of delivery, outcomes, and outcome measures used. The pooled standardised effect size estimates (ES) and the lower and upper confidence intervals (CI) of online interventions from RCTs post-interventions were significant for mental health ES = 0.47, 95% CI (0.18, 0.77), p = 0.002; stress ES = 1.27, 95% CI (0.56, 1.98), p = 0.000; and well-being ES = 0.65, 95% CI (1.2, 0.06), p = 0.03, respectively.

Conclusion: The online interventions that aimed to improve mental health, stress, and well-being included in this meta-analysis were effective. Occupational therapists supporting families play an important role in guiding parents of children with additional needs to evidence-based interventions to support them with addressing their own mental health and well-being needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信