Paolo Nardi, Claudia Altieri, Calogera Pisano, Dario Buioni, Federico Agneni, Giorgia Grizzi, Martin Dakli, Alessandro Cristian Salvati, Mattia Scognamiglio, Carlo Bassano, Giovanni Ruvolo
{"title":"在主动脉瓣置换术中,Perceval 无缝合生物瓣膜与 Trifecta 有缝合生物瓣膜的对比:Perfecta 研究的即时结果。","authors":"Paolo Nardi, Claudia Altieri, Calogera Pisano, Dario Buioni, Federico Agneni, Giorgia Grizzi, Martin Dakli, Alessandro Cristian Salvati, Mattia Scognamiglio, Carlo Bassano, Giovanni Ruvolo","doi":"10.5114/kitp.2024.143499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Perceval sutureless biological prosthesis for aortic valve replacement has been introduced with the rationale for shortening surgical, extracorporeal circulation and aortic cross-clamping times, in order to reduce postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate early hemodynamic performance and immediate outcomes of implantation of the Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis in comparison with the St. Jude Trifecta sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (Perfecta study).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between December 2014 and June 2023, 281 patients underwent St. Jude Trifecta implantation (<i>n</i> = 220, mean age: 75.2 ±6.5 years) and Perceval implantation, when indicated (<i>n</i> = 61, mean age: 77.9 ±5.1 years). Concomitant CABG was performed in 73 (33%) and in 27 (44%) patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extracorporeal circulation and cross-clamp times were significantly shorter in Perceval patients in all aortic valve replacements (61 ±23 and 49 ±18 minutes vs. 96 ±36 and 67 ±21 minutes), and in isolated procedures (54 ±10 and 43 ±8 minutes vs. 84 ±28 and 66 ±21 minutes) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001, for all comparisons). Operative mortality was absent and 2.7%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.2). Postoperatively, low output cardiac syndrome (0% vs. 4.5%) and total rate of major cardiac and non-cardiac related complications (6.6% vs. 18.6%) were significantly lower in Perceval patients (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Echocardiography at discharge in comparison with preoperatively showed a relevant and similar decrease of mean and peak trans-aortic valve gradients for the Trifecta prosthesis (11.6 ±4.3 vs. 50 ±15.2 mm Hg; 21.6 ±7.3 vs. 78.8 ±24 mm Hg) and for the Perceval prosthesis (12.6 ±4.8 vs. 52 ±12.5 mm Hg; 22.6 ±7.9 vs. 77.8 ±16 mm Hg) (<i>p</i> < 0.00001, for all comparisons). Better global cardiac function was observed in Perceval patients. Concomitant multi-vessel and left main coronary artery disease (<i>p</i> = 0.046; HR = 4.6) and chronic pulmonary disease (<i>p</i> = 0.006; HR = 5.6) were detected as independent predictors of death and postoperative major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early hemodynamic performance appears to be satisfactory with the use of Trifecta sutured and Perceval sutureless bioprostheses. Perceval implantation allows reduction of surgical times, better preservation of myocardial contractile function and, consequently, reduction of the risk of postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49945,"journal":{"name":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","volume":"21 3","pages":"153-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Trifecta sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: immediate results of the <i>Perfecta</i> study.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Nardi, Claudia Altieri, Calogera Pisano, Dario Buioni, Federico Agneni, Giorgia Grizzi, Martin Dakli, Alessandro Cristian Salvati, Mattia Scognamiglio, Carlo Bassano, Giovanni Ruvolo\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/kitp.2024.143499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Perceval sutureless biological prosthesis for aortic valve replacement has been introduced with the rationale for shortening surgical, extracorporeal circulation and aortic cross-clamping times, in order to reduce postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate early hemodynamic performance and immediate outcomes of implantation of the Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis in comparison with the St. Jude Trifecta sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (Perfecta study).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between December 2014 and June 2023, 281 patients underwent St. Jude Trifecta implantation (<i>n</i> = 220, mean age: 75.2 ±6.5 years) and Perceval implantation, when indicated (<i>n</i> = 61, mean age: 77.9 ±5.1 years). Concomitant CABG was performed in 73 (33%) and in 27 (44%) patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extracorporeal circulation and cross-clamp times were significantly shorter in Perceval patients in all aortic valve replacements (61 ±23 and 49 ±18 minutes vs. 96 ±36 and 67 ±21 minutes), and in isolated procedures (54 ±10 and 43 ±8 minutes vs. 84 ±28 and 66 ±21 minutes) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001, for all comparisons). Operative mortality was absent and 2.7%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.2). Postoperatively, low output cardiac syndrome (0% vs. 4.5%) and total rate of major cardiac and non-cardiac related complications (6.6% vs. 18.6%) were significantly lower in Perceval patients (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Echocardiography at discharge in comparison with preoperatively showed a relevant and similar decrease of mean and peak trans-aortic valve gradients for the Trifecta prosthesis (11.6 ±4.3 vs. 50 ±15.2 mm Hg; 21.6 ±7.3 vs. 78.8 ±24 mm Hg) and for the Perceval prosthesis (12.6 ±4.8 vs. 52 ±12.5 mm Hg; 22.6 ±7.9 vs. 77.8 ±16 mm Hg) (<i>p</i> < 0.00001, for all comparisons). Better global cardiac function was observed in Perceval patients. Concomitant multi-vessel and left main coronary artery disease (<i>p</i> = 0.046; HR = 4.6) and chronic pulmonary disease (<i>p</i> = 0.006; HR = 5.6) were detected as independent predictors of death and postoperative major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early hemodynamic performance appears to be satisfactory with the use of Trifecta sutured and Perceval sutureless bioprostheses. Perceval implantation allows reduction of surgical times, better preservation of myocardial contractile function and, consequently, reduction of the risk of postoperative complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"153-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2024.143499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2024.143499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Trifecta sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: immediate results of the Perfecta study.
Introduction: The Perceval sutureless biological prosthesis for aortic valve replacement has been introduced with the rationale for shortening surgical, extracorporeal circulation and aortic cross-clamping times, in order to reduce postoperative complications.
Aim: To evaluate early hemodynamic performance and immediate outcomes of implantation of the Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis in comparison with the St. Jude Trifecta sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (Perfecta study).
Material and methods: Between December 2014 and June 2023, 281 patients underwent St. Jude Trifecta implantation (n = 220, mean age: 75.2 ±6.5 years) and Perceval implantation, when indicated (n = 61, mean age: 77.9 ±5.1 years). Concomitant CABG was performed in 73 (33%) and in 27 (44%) patients, respectively.
Results: Extracorporeal circulation and cross-clamp times were significantly shorter in Perceval patients in all aortic valve replacements (61 ±23 and 49 ±18 minutes vs. 96 ±36 and 67 ±21 minutes), and in isolated procedures (54 ±10 and 43 ±8 minutes vs. 84 ±28 and 66 ±21 minutes) (p < 0.0001, for all comparisons). Operative mortality was absent and 2.7%, respectively (p = 0.2). Postoperatively, low output cardiac syndrome (0% vs. 4.5%) and total rate of major cardiac and non-cardiac related complications (6.6% vs. 18.6%) were significantly lower in Perceval patients (p = 0.01). Echocardiography at discharge in comparison with preoperatively showed a relevant and similar decrease of mean and peak trans-aortic valve gradients for the Trifecta prosthesis (11.6 ±4.3 vs. 50 ±15.2 mm Hg; 21.6 ±7.3 vs. 78.8 ±24 mm Hg) and for the Perceval prosthesis (12.6 ±4.8 vs. 52 ±12.5 mm Hg; 22.6 ±7.9 vs. 77.8 ±16 mm Hg) (p < 0.00001, for all comparisons). Better global cardiac function was observed in Perceval patients. Concomitant multi-vessel and left main coronary artery disease (p = 0.046; HR = 4.6) and chronic pulmonary disease (p = 0.006; HR = 5.6) were detected as independent predictors of death and postoperative major complications.
Conclusions: Early hemodynamic performance appears to be satisfactory with the use of Trifecta sutured and Perceval sutureless bioprostheses. Perceval implantation allows reduction of surgical times, better preservation of myocardial contractile function and, consequently, reduction of the risk of postoperative complications.
期刊介绍:
Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is a quarterly aimed at cardiologists, cardiosurgeons and thoracic surgeons. Includes the original works (experimental, research and development), illustrative and casuistical works about cardiology and cardiosurgery.