晚期急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死老年患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的最佳时机。

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.5114/kitp.2024.143685
Haiyan Jia, Weifeng Zhang, Shengqi Jia, Jun Zhang, Zhanwen Xu, Yaqin Li
{"title":"晚期急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死老年患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的最佳时机。","authors":"Haiyan Jia, Weifeng Zhang, Shengqi Jia, Jun Zhang, Zhanwen Xu, Yaqin Li","doi":"10.5114/kitp.2024.143685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is an effective method for the clinical treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). For patients who miss the optimal time window, optimal management of these patients remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the effects of different timing of percutaneous coronary intervention on the long-term prognosis of elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with time from symptom onset > 12 hours.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Elderly acute STEMI patients with time from symptom onset > 12 hours in the period from July 2021 to July 2022 in the Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, were randomly divided into four groups: group 1 (immediate invasive strategy, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) < 24 hours after symptoms onset, <i>n</i> = 80), group 2 (early invasive strategy, 24-< 72 hours after symptoms onset, <i>n</i> = 80), group 3 (delayed invasive strategy after symptoms onset, 72-< 168 hours after symptoms onset, <i>n</i> = 80), and group 4 (late PCI group after symptoms onset, ≥ 168 hours after symptoms onset, <i>n</i> = 80). Primary study end points were 12-month cardiac mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), target-vessel revascularization, and heart failure-related rehospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between groups in cardiac mortality, nonfatal MI and target-vessel revascularization. During follow-up, heart failure-related rehospitalization was higher in group 1 than in the other groups (18.8% vs. 5.1% vs. 7.4% vs. 6.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.010). Compared with group 1, group 2, group 3 and group 4 had lower heart failure-related rehospitalization (HR = 0.250, 95% CI: 0.083-0.753, <i>p</i> = 0.014) (HR = 0.377, 95% CI: 0.146-0.971, <i>p</i> = 0.043) (HR = 0.320, 95% CI: 0.116-0.879, <i>p</i> = 0.027).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For acute STEMI patients who missed the optimal time of PCI, immediate PCI did not reduce adverse clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49945,"journal":{"name":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","volume":"21 3","pages":"143-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting late.\",\"authors\":\"Haiyan Jia, Weifeng Zhang, Shengqi Jia, Jun Zhang, Zhanwen Xu, Yaqin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/kitp.2024.143685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is an effective method for the clinical treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). For patients who miss the optimal time window, optimal management of these patients remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the effects of different timing of percutaneous coronary intervention on the long-term prognosis of elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with time from symptom onset > 12 hours.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Elderly acute STEMI patients with time from symptom onset > 12 hours in the period from July 2021 to July 2022 in the Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, were randomly divided into four groups: group 1 (immediate invasive strategy, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) < 24 hours after symptoms onset, <i>n</i> = 80), group 2 (early invasive strategy, 24-< 72 hours after symptoms onset, <i>n</i> = 80), group 3 (delayed invasive strategy after symptoms onset, 72-< 168 hours after symptoms onset, <i>n</i> = 80), and group 4 (late PCI group after symptoms onset, ≥ 168 hours after symptoms onset, <i>n</i> = 80). Primary study end points were 12-month cardiac mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), target-vessel revascularization, and heart failure-related rehospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between groups in cardiac mortality, nonfatal MI and target-vessel revascularization. During follow-up, heart failure-related rehospitalization was higher in group 1 than in the other groups (18.8% vs. 5.1% vs. 7.4% vs. 6.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.010). Compared with group 1, group 2, group 3 and group 4 had lower heart failure-related rehospitalization (HR = 0.250, 95% CI: 0.083-0.753, <i>p</i> = 0.014) (HR = 0.377, 95% CI: 0.146-0.971, <i>p</i> = 0.043) (HR = 0.320, 95% CI: 0.116-0.879, <i>p</i> = 0.027).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For acute STEMI patients who missed the optimal time of PCI, immediate PCI did not reduce adverse clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"143-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523474/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2024.143685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2024.143685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)是临床治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的有效方法。目的:比较不同经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时机对急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)老年患者(症状出现时间大于 12 小时)长期预后的影响:将2021年7月至2022年7月期间在河北大学附属医院心内科就诊的发病时间大于12小时的老年急性STEMI患者随机分为四组:第1组(即刻有创策略,症状发生后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)< 24小时,n = 80),第2组(早期有创策略,症状发生后24-< 72小时,n = 80),第3组(症状发生后延迟有创策略,症状发生后72-< 168小时,n = 80),第4组(症状发生后晚期PCI组,症状发生后≥ 168小时,n = 80)。主要研究终点为12个月的心脏死亡率、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)、靶血管血运重建和心衰相关再住院:各组在心脏死亡率、非致命性心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建方面无明显差异。随访期间,第一组心衰相关再住院率高于其他组(18.8% vs. 5.1% vs. 7.4% vs. 6.3%,P = 0.010)。与第一组相比,第二组、第三组和第四组的心衰相关再住院率较低(HR = 0.250,95% CI:0.083-0.753,p = 0.014)(HR = 0.377,95% CI:0.146-0.971,p = 0.043)(HR = 0.320,95% CI:0.116-0.879,p = 0.027):对于错过最佳PCI时间的急性STEMI患者,立即PCI并不能减少不良临床结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting late.

Introduction: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is an effective method for the clinical treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). For patients who miss the optimal time window, optimal management of these patients remains controversial.

Aim: To compare the effects of different timing of percutaneous coronary intervention on the long-term prognosis of elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with time from symptom onset > 12 hours.

Material and methods: Elderly acute STEMI patients with time from symptom onset > 12 hours in the period from July 2021 to July 2022 in the Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, were randomly divided into four groups: group 1 (immediate invasive strategy, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) < 24 hours after symptoms onset, n = 80), group 2 (early invasive strategy, 24-< 72 hours after symptoms onset, n = 80), group 3 (delayed invasive strategy after symptoms onset, 72-< 168 hours after symptoms onset, n = 80), and group 4 (late PCI group after symptoms onset, ≥ 168 hours after symptoms onset, n = 80). Primary study end points were 12-month cardiac mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), target-vessel revascularization, and heart failure-related rehospitalization.

Results: There were no significant differences between groups in cardiac mortality, nonfatal MI and target-vessel revascularization. During follow-up, heart failure-related rehospitalization was higher in group 1 than in the other groups (18.8% vs. 5.1% vs. 7.4% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.010). Compared with group 1, group 2, group 3 and group 4 had lower heart failure-related rehospitalization (HR = 0.250, 95% CI: 0.083-0.753, p = 0.014) (HR = 0.377, 95% CI: 0.146-0.971, p = 0.043) (HR = 0.320, 95% CI: 0.116-0.879, p = 0.027).

Conclusions: For acute STEMI patients who missed the optimal time of PCI, immediate PCI did not reduce adverse clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is a quarterly aimed at cardiologists, cardiosurgeons and thoracic surgeons. Includes the original works (experimental, research and development), illustrative and casuistical works about cardiology and cardiosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信