吸入式左旋多巴干粉制剂对帕金森病患者脱发的治疗效果。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864241289207
Lara de Jong, Marianne Luinstra, Angela Francesca Aalbers, Alide Johanna Wijma-Vos, Emile D'Angremont, Anne Aline Elisabeth van der Meulen, Antonie Wijnand Frederik Rutgers, Luc Steenhuis, Paul Hagedoorn, Teus van Laar, Hendrik Willem Frijlink
{"title":"吸入式左旋多巴干粉制剂对帕金森病患者脱发的治疗效果。","authors":"Lara de Jong, Marianne Luinstra, Angela Francesca Aalbers, Alide Johanna Wijma-Vos, Emile D'Angremont, Anne Aline Elisabeth van der Meulen, Antonie Wijnand Frederik Rutgers, Luc Steenhuis, Paul Hagedoorn, Teus van Laar, Hendrik Willem Frijlink","doi":"10.1177/17562864241289207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited treatment options with a rapid onset of action are available to treat off episodes in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Therefore, the development of rapid onset formulations, for instance with levodopa, is warranted, which was the reason to investigate an inhalable formulation of levodopa.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to determine the duration until maximum effect is reached of inhaled levodopa on the improvement of motor function of PD patients. The secondary objective was to compare the time until maximal effect and the maximal effect of inhaled levodopa versus oral levodopa.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Open-label randomized two-way one-period crossover trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine PD patients in the 'off state' received one dose of inhaled levodopa (90 mg) from Cyclops® and one dose of levodopa orodispersible tablet (100 mg) on two consecutive days in a randomized order. A timed tapping test, Timed Up and Go test (TUG test) and Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) III score were performed pre-dose and on set time points up to 90 min post-dose as measure for motor function. In addition, blood samples were taken for a pharmacokinetic evaluation (<i>T</i> <sub>max</sub>, <i>C</i> <sub>max</sub> and area under the concentration time curve (AUC) 0-3 h).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximal effect of inhaled levodopa was reached at 30 min (tapping test), at 75 min (TUG test) and at 60 min (UPDRS III). The positive effect on the UPDRS was statistically significant within 20 min after inhalation. After oral administration, <i>C</i> <sub>max</sub> and AUC 0-3 h were found to be significant higher (<i>p</i> = 0.028 and <i>p</i> = 0.028, respectively) than after pulmonary administration. <i>T</i> <sub>max</sub> was achieved significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.028) faster after inhalation. The motor function examinations showed a similar maximum clinical improvement after pulmonary and oral administration and although not significant, inhaled levodopa results in a shorter median duration to maximum clinical effect for the TUG and timed finger-tapping test compared with oral administration (TUG: inhalation 55.0 and oral 67.5 min, timed finger-tapping test: inhalation 35.0 and oral 57.5 min). After the levodopa inhalation, there were no adverse events observed and no significant differences found in long-function parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inhaled levodopa from Cyclops<sup>®</sup> shows promising data as a rescue therapy for PD patients with off episodes, not responsive to the current oral therapies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was approved by the local ethics board 'Regionale toetsingscommissie patiëntgebonden onderzoek' (RTPO) in Leeuwarden, The Netherlands (approval number RTPO1019). The study was registered in in the Dutch trial register (LTR) with identification number NL6876. From 5 March 2024 on, the research data on onderzoekmetmensen.nl are known as 'Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands' (OMON). This means the use of the name LTR has thus been dropped. Now, it is registered in the OMON with the same identification number (NL6876, Effectiveness of inhaled levodopa in PD | Research with human participants (onderzoekmetmensen.nl)). All patients provided written informed consent.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562864241289207"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic effect of an inhaled levodopa dry powder formulation on off episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Lara de Jong, Marianne Luinstra, Angela Francesca Aalbers, Alide Johanna Wijma-Vos, Emile D'Angremont, Anne Aline Elisabeth van der Meulen, Antonie Wijnand Frederik Rutgers, Luc Steenhuis, Paul Hagedoorn, Teus van Laar, Hendrik Willem Frijlink\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562864241289207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited treatment options with a rapid onset of action are available to treat off episodes in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Therefore, the development of rapid onset formulations, for instance with levodopa, is warranted, which was the reason to investigate an inhalable formulation of levodopa.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to determine the duration until maximum effect is reached of inhaled levodopa on the improvement of motor function of PD patients. The secondary objective was to compare the time until maximal effect and the maximal effect of inhaled levodopa versus oral levodopa.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Open-label randomized two-way one-period crossover trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine PD patients in the 'off state' received one dose of inhaled levodopa (90 mg) from Cyclops® and one dose of levodopa orodispersible tablet (100 mg) on two consecutive days in a randomized order. A timed tapping test, Timed Up and Go test (TUG test) and Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) III score were performed pre-dose and on set time points up to 90 min post-dose as measure for motor function. In addition, blood samples were taken for a pharmacokinetic evaluation (<i>T</i> <sub>max</sub>, <i>C</i> <sub>max</sub> and area under the concentration time curve (AUC) 0-3 h).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximal effect of inhaled levodopa was reached at 30 min (tapping test), at 75 min (TUG test) and at 60 min (UPDRS III). The positive effect on the UPDRS was statistically significant within 20 min after inhalation. After oral administration, <i>C</i> <sub>max</sub> and AUC 0-3 h were found to be significant higher (<i>p</i> = 0.028 and <i>p</i> = 0.028, respectively) than after pulmonary administration. <i>T</i> <sub>max</sub> was achieved significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.028) faster after inhalation. The motor function examinations showed a similar maximum clinical improvement after pulmonary and oral administration and although not significant, inhaled levodopa results in a shorter median duration to maximum clinical effect for the TUG and timed finger-tapping test compared with oral administration (TUG: inhalation 55.0 and oral 67.5 min, timed finger-tapping test: inhalation 35.0 and oral 57.5 min). After the levodopa inhalation, there were no adverse events observed and no significant differences found in long-function parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inhaled levodopa from Cyclops<sup>®</sup> shows promising data as a rescue therapy for PD patients with off episodes, not responsive to the current oral therapies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was approved by the local ethics board 'Regionale toetsingscommissie patiëntgebonden onderzoek' (RTPO) in Leeuwarden, The Netherlands (approval number RTPO1019). The study was registered in in the Dutch trial register (LTR) with identification number NL6876. From 5 March 2024 on, the research data on onderzoekmetmensen.nl are known as 'Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands' (OMON). This means the use of the name LTR has thus been dropped. Now, it is registered in the OMON with the same identification number (NL6876, Effectiveness of inhaled levodopa in PD | Research with human participants (onderzoekmetmensen.nl)). All patients provided written informed consent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"17562864241289207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526263/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241289207\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241289207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前治疗帕金森病(PD)患者发作的起效迅速的治疗方案有限。因此,有必要开发起效迅速的制剂,例如左旋多巴,这也是研究左旋多巴吸入制剂的原因:首要目标是确定吸入左旋多巴对改善帕金森病患者运动功能达到最大效果的持续时间。次要目标是比较吸入左旋多巴与口服左旋多巴达到最大疗效的时间和最大疗效:开放标签随机双向单期交叉试验:9名处于 "关闭状态 "的帕金森病患者在连续两天内随机接受一剂Cyclops®吸入左旋多巴(90毫克)和一剂左旋多巴口服分散片(100毫克)。在用药前和用药后 90 分钟内的设定时间点进行定时拍打测试、定时起立行走测试(TUG 测试)和运动障碍协会统一帕金森病评分量表(MDS-UPDRS)III 评分,以衡量患者的运动功能。此外,还抽取了血液样本进行药代动力学评估(T max、C max和浓度时间曲线下面积(AUC)0-3 h):结果:吸入左旋多巴在30分钟(敲击测试)、75分钟(TUG测试)和60分钟(UPDRS III)时达到最大效果。吸入后20分钟内,对UPDRS的积极影响具有统计学意义。口服给药后,C max 和 AUC 0-3 h 显著高于肺部给药后(分别为 p = 0.028 和 p = 0.028)。吸入后达到 T max 的速度明显更快(p = 0.028)。运动功能检查显示,肺部给药和口服给药后的最大临床改善程度相似,尽管不显著,但与口服给药相比,吸入左旋多巴可使TUG和定时敲击手指测试达到最大临床效果的中位持续时间更短(TUG:吸入55.0分钟,口服67.5分钟;定时敲击手指测试:吸入35.0分钟,口服57.5分钟)。吸入左旋多巴后,未发现不良反应,长期功能参数也无显著差异:结论:Cyclops®左旋多巴吸入剂作为对目前口服疗法无反应的帕金森病脱失发作患者的抢救疗法,显示出良好的前景:研究方案获得了荷兰吕伐登当地伦理委员会 "Regionale toetsingscommissie patiëntgebonden onderzoek"(RTPO)的批准(批准号为 RTPO1019)。该研究已在荷兰试验登记处(LTR)登记,标识号为 NL6876。从 2024 年 3 月 5 日起,onderzoekmetmensen.nl 上的研究数据将被称为 "荷兰医学研究概述"(OMON)。这意味着 LTR 这一名称已不再使用。现在,该研究以相同的识别号(NL6876,吸入式左旋多巴对帕金森病的疗效|有人类参与者的研究(onderzoekmetmensen.nl))在OMON中注册。所有患者均提供了书面知情同意书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapeutic effect of an inhaled levodopa dry powder formulation on off episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Background: Limited treatment options with a rapid onset of action are available to treat off episodes in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Therefore, the development of rapid onset formulations, for instance with levodopa, is warranted, which was the reason to investigate an inhalable formulation of levodopa.

Objectives: The primary objective was to determine the duration until maximum effect is reached of inhaled levodopa on the improvement of motor function of PD patients. The secondary objective was to compare the time until maximal effect and the maximal effect of inhaled levodopa versus oral levodopa.

Design: Open-label randomized two-way one-period crossover trial.

Methods: Nine PD patients in the 'off state' received one dose of inhaled levodopa (90 mg) from Cyclops® and one dose of levodopa orodispersible tablet (100 mg) on two consecutive days in a randomized order. A timed tapping test, Timed Up and Go test (TUG test) and Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) III score were performed pre-dose and on set time points up to 90 min post-dose as measure for motor function. In addition, blood samples were taken for a pharmacokinetic evaluation (T max, C max and area under the concentration time curve (AUC) 0-3 h).

Results: The maximal effect of inhaled levodopa was reached at 30 min (tapping test), at 75 min (TUG test) and at 60 min (UPDRS III). The positive effect on the UPDRS was statistically significant within 20 min after inhalation. After oral administration, C max and AUC 0-3 h were found to be significant higher (p = 0.028 and p = 0.028, respectively) than after pulmonary administration. T max was achieved significantly (p = 0.028) faster after inhalation. The motor function examinations showed a similar maximum clinical improvement after pulmonary and oral administration and although not significant, inhaled levodopa results in a shorter median duration to maximum clinical effect for the TUG and timed finger-tapping test compared with oral administration (TUG: inhalation 55.0 and oral 67.5 min, timed finger-tapping test: inhalation 35.0 and oral 57.5 min). After the levodopa inhalation, there were no adverse events observed and no significant differences found in long-function parameters.

Conclusion: Inhaled levodopa from Cyclops® shows promising data as a rescue therapy for PD patients with off episodes, not responsive to the current oral therapies.

Trial registration: The study protocol was approved by the local ethics board 'Regionale toetsingscommissie patiëntgebonden onderzoek' (RTPO) in Leeuwarden, The Netherlands (approval number RTPO1019). The study was registered in in the Dutch trial register (LTR) with identification number NL6876. From 5 March 2024 on, the research data on onderzoekmetmensen.nl are known as 'Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands' (OMON). This means the use of the name LTR has thus been dropped. Now, it is registered in the OMON with the same identification number (NL6876, Effectiveness of inhaled levodopa in PD | Research with human participants (onderzoekmetmensen.nl)). All patients provided written informed consent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信