Liliane Cristina Nogueira Marinho, Guilherme Carlos Beiruth Freire, Davi Neto de Araújo Silva, Kenio Costa de Lima, Éricka Janine Dantas da Silveira, Gleidston Silva Potter, Rodolfo Daniel de Almeida Soares, Ana Rafaela Luz de Aquino Martins
{"title":"预防和治疗造血干细胞移植患者口腔黏膜炎的光生物调节疗法:健康质量评估。","authors":"Liliane Cristina Nogueira Marinho, Guilherme Carlos Beiruth Freire, Davi Neto de Araújo Silva, Kenio Costa de Lima, Éricka Janine Dantas da Silveira, Gleidston Silva Potter, Rodolfo Daniel de Almeida Soares, Ana Rafaela Luz de Aquino Martins","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08952-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the quality of oral health care through indicators in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the management of oral mucositis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five patients were evaluated. Photobiomodulation was performed during the conditioning regimen, 1 day, 5 days, and 10 days after transplantation. Four process indicators and 13 outcome indicators were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention, according to SQUIRE 2.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All process indicators demonstrated a compliance rate of 100% to the desired standard. Outcome indicators revealed that 66.6% of patients experienced mucositis during at least one follow-up period. A statistically significant increase was observed between periods of 1 and 5 days post-transplant, as well as between 1 and 10 days post-transplant (p < 0.05), with a predominance of grade I mucositis (p = 0.014). Four patients (16.7%) reported feeling pain, occurring between 5 and 10 days after transplantation, with moderate pain being the most prevalent. Oral mucositis did not show a statistically significant association with pain, associated treatments, leukopenia, comorbidities, or type of transplant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The indicators demonstrated their suitability for evaluating oral health in both the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in these patients. Furthermore, the effectiveness of photobiomodulation in improving the quality of oral health in the patients studied was confirmed.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photobiomodulation for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in patients submitted to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: health quality evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Liliane Cristina Nogueira Marinho, Guilherme Carlos Beiruth Freire, Davi Neto de Araújo Silva, Kenio Costa de Lima, Éricka Janine Dantas da Silveira, Gleidston Silva Potter, Rodolfo Daniel de Almeida Soares, Ana Rafaela Luz de Aquino Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-024-08952-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the quality of oral health care through indicators in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the management of oral mucositis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five patients were evaluated. Photobiomodulation was performed during the conditioning regimen, 1 day, 5 days, and 10 days after transplantation. Four process indicators and 13 outcome indicators were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention, according to SQUIRE 2.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All process indicators demonstrated a compliance rate of 100% to the desired standard. Outcome indicators revealed that 66.6% of patients experienced mucositis during at least one follow-up period. A statistically significant increase was observed between periods of 1 and 5 days post-transplant, as well as between 1 and 10 days post-transplant (p < 0.05), with a predominance of grade I mucositis (p = 0.014). Four patients (16.7%) reported feeling pain, occurring between 5 and 10 days after transplantation, with moderate pain being the most prevalent. Oral mucositis did not show a statistically significant association with pain, associated treatments, leukopenia, comorbidities, or type of transplant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The indicators demonstrated their suitability for evaluating oral health in both the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in these patients. Furthermore, the effectiveness of photobiomodulation in improving the quality of oral health in the patients studied was confirmed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08952-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08952-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Photobiomodulation for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in patients submitted to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: health quality evaluation.
Objective: To evaluate the quality of oral health care through indicators in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the management of oral mucositis.
Methods: Thirty-five patients were evaluated. Photobiomodulation was performed during the conditioning regimen, 1 day, 5 days, and 10 days after transplantation. Four process indicators and 13 outcome indicators were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention, according to SQUIRE 2.0.
Results: All process indicators demonstrated a compliance rate of 100% to the desired standard. Outcome indicators revealed that 66.6% of patients experienced mucositis during at least one follow-up period. A statistically significant increase was observed between periods of 1 and 5 days post-transplant, as well as between 1 and 10 days post-transplant (p < 0.05), with a predominance of grade I mucositis (p = 0.014). Four patients (16.7%) reported feeling pain, occurring between 5 and 10 days after transplantation, with moderate pain being the most prevalent. Oral mucositis did not show a statistically significant association with pain, associated treatments, leukopenia, comorbidities, or type of transplant.
Conclusions: The indicators demonstrated their suitability for evaluating oral health in both the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in these patients. Furthermore, the effectiveness of photobiomodulation in improving the quality of oral health in the patients studied was confirmed.
期刊介绍:
Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease.
Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.