Fatemeh Naghiloo, Wendy Shields, Shannon Frattaroli, Max Rasbold-Gabbard, Rebekah Thomas, Sadiqa Kendi
{"title":"马萨诸塞州儿科伤害公平审查(MassPIER):解决伤害不公平问题的程序。","authors":"Fatemeh Naghiloo, Wendy Shields, Shannon Frattaroli, Max Rasbold-Gabbard, Rebekah Thomas, Sadiqa Kendi","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-067043D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Significant inequities in pediatric injury outcomes exist. We aim to develop a process to assist child death review (CDR) teams in identifying upstream factors that lead to inequitable outcomes in pediatric injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We spent 6 months (November 2021-April 2022) working with 3 CDR teams in Massachusetts to understand their tools and processes for CDR. During that time, we began to iteratively develop a pediatric injury equity review process and tools. Between May and October 2022, acceptability and adaptability of the resulting Massachusetts Pediatric Injury Equity Review (MassPIER) process and tools were evaluated through focus groups and a Research Electronic Data Capture survey of participants. We compared the prevention recommendations of the CDR teams before the implementation of MassPIER with those generated using MassPIER. A χ2 and Fisher's exact test assessed whether the 2 sets of recommendations differed with regard to equity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 7-step process was developed, along with 2 tools for use during the MassPIER process. From an acceptability and adaptability standpoint, 100% of participants strongly agreed or agreed that the MassPIER process was simple to follow and adaptable to any type of injury. Ninety-five percent of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the approach could be replicated by other teams. Furthermore, the MassPIER process increased the likelihood of generating equity-focused recommendations in general (P < .05), and particularly recommendations focusing on economic inequities (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MassPIER is effective in facilitating equity-focused discussion and recommendation development. It is acceptable to team members, and adaptable to other types of injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"154 Suppl 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Massachusetts Pediatric Injury Equity Review (MassPIER): A Process to Address Injury Inequities.\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Naghiloo, Wendy Shields, Shannon Frattaroli, Max Rasbold-Gabbard, Rebekah Thomas, Sadiqa Kendi\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/peds.2024-067043D\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Significant inequities in pediatric injury outcomes exist. We aim to develop a process to assist child death review (CDR) teams in identifying upstream factors that lead to inequitable outcomes in pediatric injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We spent 6 months (November 2021-April 2022) working with 3 CDR teams in Massachusetts to understand their tools and processes for CDR. During that time, we began to iteratively develop a pediatric injury equity review process and tools. Between May and October 2022, acceptability and adaptability of the resulting Massachusetts Pediatric Injury Equity Review (MassPIER) process and tools were evaluated through focus groups and a Research Electronic Data Capture survey of participants. We compared the prevention recommendations of the CDR teams before the implementation of MassPIER with those generated using MassPIER. A χ2 and Fisher's exact test assessed whether the 2 sets of recommendations differed with regard to equity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 7-step process was developed, along with 2 tools for use during the MassPIER process. From an acceptability and adaptability standpoint, 100% of participants strongly agreed or agreed that the MassPIER process was simple to follow and adaptable to any type of injury. Ninety-five percent of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the approach could be replicated by other teams. Furthermore, the MassPIER process increased the likelihood of generating equity-focused recommendations in general (P < .05), and particularly recommendations focusing on economic inequities (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MassPIER is effective in facilitating equity-focused discussion and recommendation development. It is acceptable to team members, and adaptable to other types of injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"154 Suppl 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-067043D\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-067043D","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Massachusetts Pediatric Injury Equity Review (MassPIER): A Process to Address Injury Inequities.
Objectives: Significant inequities in pediatric injury outcomes exist. We aim to develop a process to assist child death review (CDR) teams in identifying upstream factors that lead to inequitable outcomes in pediatric injuries.
Methods: We spent 6 months (November 2021-April 2022) working with 3 CDR teams in Massachusetts to understand their tools and processes for CDR. During that time, we began to iteratively develop a pediatric injury equity review process and tools. Between May and October 2022, acceptability and adaptability of the resulting Massachusetts Pediatric Injury Equity Review (MassPIER) process and tools were evaluated through focus groups and a Research Electronic Data Capture survey of participants. We compared the prevention recommendations of the CDR teams before the implementation of MassPIER with those generated using MassPIER. A χ2 and Fisher's exact test assessed whether the 2 sets of recommendations differed with regard to equity.
Results: A 7-step process was developed, along with 2 tools for use during the MassPIER process. From an acceptability and adaptability standpoint, 100% of participants strongly agreed or agreed that the MassPIER process was simple to follow and adaptable to any type of injury. Ninety-five percent of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the approach could be replicated by other teams. Furthermore, the MassPIER process increased the likelihood of generating equity-focused recommendations in general (P < .05), and particularly recommendations focusing on economic inequities (P < .05).
Conclusions: MassPIER is effective in facilitating equity-focused discussion and recommendation development. It is acceptable to team members, and adaptable to other types of injury.
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.