Michael MacRaild, Ali Sarrami-Foroushani, Shuang Song, Qiongyao Liu, Christopher Kelly, Nishant Ravikumar, Tufail Patankar, Toni Lassila, Zeike A Taylor, Alejandro F Frangi
{"title":"对后交通动脉瘤进行标示外硅胶血流分流器性能评估。","authors":"Michael MacRaild, Ali Sarrami-Foroushani, Shuang Song, Qiongyao Liu, Christopher Kelly, Nishant Ravikumar, Tufail Patankar, Toni Lassila, Zeike A Taylor, Alejandro F Frangi","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The posterior communicating artery (PComA) is among the most common intracranial aneurysm locations, but flow diverter (FD) treatment with the widely used pipeline embolization device (PED) remains an off-label treatment that is not well understood. PComA aneurysm flow diversion is complicated by the presence of fetal posterior circulation (FPC), which has an estimated prevalence of 4-29% and is more common in people of black (11.5%) than white (4.9%) race. We present the FD-PComA in-silico trial (IST) into FD treatment performance in PComA aneurysms. ISTs use computational modeling and simulation in cohorts of virtual patients to evaluate medical device performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We modeled FD treatment in 118 virtual patients with 59 distinct PComA aneurysm anatomies, using computational fluid dynamics to assess post-treatment outcome. Boundary conditions were prescribed to model the effects of non-fetal and FPC, allowing for comparison between these subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FD-PComA predicted reduced treatment success in FPC patients, with an average aneurysm space and time-averaged velocity reduction of 67.8% for non-fetal patients and 46.5% for fetal patients (P<i><</i>0.001). Space and time-averaged wall shear stress on the device surface was 29.2 Pa averaged across fetal patients and 23.5 Pa across non-fetal (P<i><</i>0.05) patients, suggesting FD endothelialization may be hindered in FPC patients. Morphological variables, such as the size and shape of the aneurysm and PComA size, did not affect the treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FD-PComA had significantly lower treatment success rates in PComA aneurysm patients with FPC. We suggest that FPC patients should be treated with an alternative to single PED flow diversion.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Off-label in-silico flow diverter performance assessment in posterior communicating artery aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"Michael MacRaild, Ali Sarrami-Foroushani, Shuang Song, Qiongyao Liu, Christopher Kelly, Nishant Ravikumar, Tufail Patankar, Toni Lassila, Zeike A Taylor, Alejandro F Frangi\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2024-022000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The posterior communicating artery (PComA) is among the most common intracranial aneurysm locations, but flow diverter (FD) treatment with the widely used pipeline embolization device (PED) remains an off-label treatment that is not well understood. PComA aneurysm flow diversion is complicated by the presence of fetal posterior circulation (FPC), which has an estimated prevalence of 4-29% and is more common in people of black (11.5%) than white (4.9%) race. We present the FD-PComA in-silico trial (IST) into FD treatment performance in PComA aneurysms. ISTs use computational modeling and simulation in cohorts of virtual patients to evaluate medical device performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We modeled FD treatment in 118 virtual patients with 59 distinct PComA aneurysm anatomies, using computational fluid dynamics to assess post-treatment outcome. Boundary conditions were prescribed to model the effects of non-fetal and FPC, allowing for comparison between these subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FD-PComA predicted reduced treatment success in FPC patients, with an average aneurysm space and time-averaged velocity reduction of 67.8% for non-fetal patients and 46.5% for fetal patients (P<i><</i>0.001). Space and time-averaged wall shear stress on the device surface was 29.2 Pa averaged across fetal patients and 23.5 Pa across non-fetal (P<i><</i>0.05) patients, suggesting FD endothelialization may be hindered in FPC patients. Morphological variables, such as the size and shape of the aneurysm and PComA size, did not affect the treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FD-PComA had significantly lower treatment success rates in PComA aneurysm patients with FPC. We suggest that FPC patients should be treated with an alternative to single PED flow diversion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022000\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022000","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The posterior communicating artery (PComA) is among the most common intracranial aneurysm locations, but flow diverter (FD) treatment with the widely used pipeline embolization device (PED) remains an off-label treatment that is not well understood. PComA aneurysm flow diversion is complicated by the presence of fetal posterior circulation (FPC), which has an estimated prevalence of 4-29% and is more common in people of black (11.5%) than white (4.9%) race. We present the FD-PComA in-silico trial (IST) into FD treatment performance in PComA aneurysms. ISTs use computational modeling and simulation in cohorts of virtual patients to evaluate medical device performance.
Methods: We modeled FD treatment in 118 virtual patients with 59 distinct PComA aneurysm anatomies, using computational fluid dynamics to assess post-treatment outcome. Boundary conditions were prescribed to model the effects of non-fetal and FPC, allowing for comparison between these subgroups.
Results: FD-PComA predicted reduced treatment success in FPC patients, with an average aneurysm space and time-averaged velocity reduction of 67.8% for non-fetal patients and 46.5% for fetal patients (P<0.001). Space and time-averaged wall shear stress on the device surface was 29.2 Pa averaged across fetal patients and 23.5 Pa across non-fetal (P<0.05) patients, suggesting FD endothelialization may be hindered in FPC patients. Morphological variables, such as the size and shape of the aneurysm and PComA size, did not affect the treatment outcome.
Conclusions: FD-PComA had significantly lower treatment success rates in PComA aneurysm patients with FPC. We suggest that FPC patients should be treated with an alternative to single PED flow diversion.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.